Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# A Tip for easily factorizing quadratics with complex roots but real coefficients watch

1. I thought that many people who are good at factorizing and don't like to use the quadratic formula would probably find this useful. This method is really easy, and once you grasp it you'll find those quadratics much easier to factorize than the ones with real roots but where the coefficient is not equal to 1. I'll put it in a step by step form, kind of, because that numbering thing isn't working for some reason.
Make sure the coefficient of is positive!
Also I will expect the trinomial to be put in the form , where , and I will be referring to the coefficients by their corresponding letters.

Recognize the quadratic:
By this I mean make sure the quadratic does have complex roots. An easy way to see that it does NOT is when is negative. Also when is positive and large compared to it probably has complex roots.

When :
This is when it's really easy to do, and this is where you'll save the most time compared to using the quadratic formula or completing the square. Start by halving , and voilà, you already have the real part of your complex roots (well, MINUS the real part)! Now subtract its square from and square root the number you get, and that will be your imaginary part!

Example:
Let's do together. We can easily see the real part is , and squaring that and taking it away from 13, . So our imaginary part is , therefore our roots are .

When :
There are a few ways to do this without the quadratic formula, but unless is a perfect square and is divisible by AND , and that is a lot to ask, then these methods aren't worth it. So in the end I recommend using the quadratic formula. OF COURSE, here I'm assuming that have no factor in common.

Try it!:

Solutions:
Spoiler:
Show

2. (Original post by gagafacea1)
Example:
Let's do together. We can easily see the real part is , and squaring that and taking it away from 13, . So our imaginary part is , therefore our roots are .
When the person suggesting the method gets the wrong result, it's not a good sign.
3. (Original post by gagafacea1)
x
I don't really understand this post, you start off by saying that this method is helpful for people who aren't comfortable with the quadratic formula to factorise quadratic, then give a method that applies to a special case before ending with "use the quadratic formula".

In any case, .

I concur with ghostwalker on this one.
4. (Original post by ghostwalker)
When the person suggesting the method gets the wrong result, it's not a good sign.
Oh shoot, I'm so sorry. I knew this was gonna happen. Thanks for pointing it out anyways.
(Original post by Zacken)
I don't really understand this post, you start off by saying that this method is helpful for people who aren't comfortable with the quadratic formula to factorise quadratic, then give a method that applies to a special case before ending with "use the quadratic formula".

In any case, .
Tbh I was going to write down the method I use, but it might be a bit too much. Plus I wouldn't call a=1 a very special case. And really if you can't use the quadratic formula maybe you shouldn't be doing complex numbers just yet. What I meant was "didn't like the quadratic formula", so sorry about that.
5. Sorry OP but this is useless. I think vote downs should still be here for posts like this.
6. (Original post by zetamcfc)
Sorry OP but this is useless. I think vote downs should still be here for posts like this.
A bit too harsh to call this one of reasons for having vote downs. Many more actually useless posts out there.
7. To be honest I don't think this is a helpful post. There's only really one useful idea, (the a = 1 case), and this is really just a restatement of the quadratic formula taking advantage of the simplification that a = 1.

But I would rather explicitly point out that the roots of x^2+2bx+c are which holds for both real and complex roots.

Situations where this applies are common enough that it's probably worth knowing about. (But it's obviously not essential, it just saves a small amount of calculation).
8. (Original post by DFranklin)
To be honest I don't think this is a helpful post. There's only really one useful idea, (the a = 1 case), and this is really just a restatement of the quadratic formula taking advantage of the simplification that a = 1.

But I would rather explicitly point out that the roots of x^2+2bx+c are which holds for both real and complex roots.

Situations where this applies are common enough that it's probably worth knowing about. (But it's obviously not essential, it just saves a small amount of calculation).
I guess you're right, do you think I should delete the post? I only made it because a few people were surprised when I told them about it.
9. (Original post by gagafacea1)
I guess you're right, do you think I should delete the post? I only made it because a few people were surprised when I told them about it.
I don't think it's a big deal.

I think it's fair to say that if you make a post giving tips / advice, then you are implicitly stating you're an authority, and those posts are going to get a lot more critical scrutiny, because we want to make sure you're not giving people bad advice (that they are likely to take as gospel).

Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: November 1, 2015
Today on TSR

### Are these types of degrees the future?

What are your thoughts?

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.