Voltage across Capacitor equation derivation. Pls help, much appreciated
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
0
reply
Report
#2
You will get the exact same formula even if you do not multiply by -1. I think it might be because it makes the LHS integral a tiny bit nicer (though it really makes no difference in my opinion):




Now is probably the time where a physicist comes in an tells me it is not as simple as the maths suggests haha.




Now is probably the time where a physicist comes in an tells me it is not as simple as the maths suggests haha.
0
reply
Report
#3
(Original post by 16Characters....)
You will get the exact same formula even if you do not multiply by -1. I think it might be because it makes the LHS integral a tiny bit nicer (though it really makes no difference in my opinion):




Now is probably the time where a physicist comes in an tells me it is not as simple as the maths suggests haha.
You will get the exact same formula even if you do not multiply by -1. I think it might be because it makes the LHS integral a tiny bit nicer (though it really makes no difference in my opinion):




Now is probably the time where a physicist comes in an tells me it is not as simple as the maths suggests haha.
The equation tells us the charge stored in an initially isolated capacitor (Vc = Vo) will exponentially decay at a rate governed by the product between the capacitance and current path resistance.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top