(Original post by vienna95)
can be true or can never be true? either way, is irrelevant to my point.
an article whos claims are substantiated.
fake pictures, by their definition, would not display acts that would have occured.
i) a personal assesment without substance
ii) totally inaccurate
iii) you accuse me of being a racist with the evidence suggesting the contrary.
another lie. no such assertion was ever made.
again, you make a claim that brings nothing to the debate.
entirely irrelevant material that may be discarded for the purposes of this discussion.
personal remark #742942
another clear fabrication that has been refuted and demonstrated, yet you persist without any evidence.
more irrelevant material.
I really could not say if you are a racist, unless you think you hate a race or think its less superior than others. I don't see the relevance of your complex of being a racist to Abu ghraib.
However, I do find that you just have all these rosy opinions of the US admin and the israeli admin (how ironic) and that you refuse to even view or let alone allowe yourself to think that they might be doing wrong too.
What you call irrelvant is just history and I guess if you find that tough to deal with seein as you must resort to evading the questions and the facts then you will find proof even harder to tackle.
Are you saying ALL pictures from Abu ghraib are fake? As or israeli well I have not seen them yet. Have you? No then I don't think you call them fake. You accuse me of lies when in fact all I am doing is stating what you said yourself. In case you forget I refer you to your own comment. You can cover them up anyway you like but that does not disguise the fact that your outlook on rape and sex crimes in war is void of all humanity. You seem to think everybody just makes it up because they are on drugs and unstable characters. Maybe the truth is too bitter?
Afterall why admit the heros you are actually rooting for are terrorist themselves. Because you call something by a different name does not make it any different. If it walks like duck, talks like a duck and acts like a duck then it is a duck. Abu Ghraib is a living prrof of military taking their lead from israeli prisons and not least the US admin. Israeli prisons won't let anybody inside. After Jenin it has become difficult for actual peace loving groups to account for what is actually going on.
And you probably think that in light of the suicide bombings in iraq and the attacks on american and allied troups are a sign of iraqis still wanting the US there? Hardly. That is what I said in a different topic. US presence is unwanted. They removed saddam and they raped the public and stipped them of all dignity and morality. GO HOME instead of persisting to stay.
As long as they stay no amount of terrorism (read: wars on terror) will remove the terrorism. Terrorism is a conswquence of US foreign policy. Not the other way around.