Go to first unread
Back
to top
The MAT vs STEP?
Watch
Announcements
I was talking to a friend about the admission test Oxford uses for their mathematical degrees.
I wanted to know how hard the MAT is in comparison to the STEP exam? Also what is the highest marks that have been achieved on either paper. Is full marks a realistic outcome?
Thanks!
I wanted to know how hard the MAT is in comparison to the STEP exam? Also what is the highest marks that have been achieved on either paper. Is full marks a realistic outcome?
Thanks!
0
reply
Report
#2
MAT is easy peasy (in comparison to STEP)! You can probably prepare well for MAT in a few days of hard work. STEP requires months. You can see how many people get each mark on the MAT here. Some people do get above 90%, but not many. Full marks are certainly not required to get an offer. Unlike AS/A2 maths papers, you probably shouldn't be aiming for full marks. Why not try a paper and find out how hard it is?
1
reply
Report
#3
(Original post by High Stakes)
I was talking to a friend about the admission test Oxford uses for their mathematical degrees.
I wanted to know how hard the MAT is in comparison to the STEP exam? Also what is the highest marks that have been achieved on either paper. Is full marks a realistic outcome?
Thanks!
I was talking to a friend about the admission test Oxford uses for their mathematical degrees.
I wanted to know how hard the MAT is in comparison to the STEP exam? Also what is the highest marks that have been achieved on either paper. Is full marks a realistic outcome?
Thanks!
http://www.admissionstestingservice....g-and-results/
e.g. 2015
http://www.admissionstestingservice....of-results.pdf
It looks like nobody got full marks (120) in any STEP paper this year.
BTW STEP consists of 3 papers, usually STEP II & III are required for Maths applicants.
0
reply
(Original post by jneill)
You can see detailed distribution charts of marks for STEP here:
http://www.admissionstestingservice....g-and-results/
e.g. 2015
http://www.admissionstestingservice....of-results.pdf
It looks like nobody got full marks (120) in any STEP paper this year.
BTW STEP consists of 3 papers, usually STEP II & III are required for Maths applicants.
You can see detailed distribution charts of marks for STEP here:
http://www.admissionstestingservice....g-and-results/
e.g. 2015
http://www.admissionstestingservice....of-results.pdf
It looks like nobody got full marks (120) in any STEP paper this year.
BTW STEP consists of 3 papers, usually STEP II & III are required for Maths applicants.
Thanks for the links btw. Quite interesting.
0
reply
Report
#5
Personally I'm not a fan of the MAT; I just think it's too simplistic 
STEP is way more interesting and enjoyable!
It's also harder.
STEP is way more interesting and enjoyable!
It's also harder.
1
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by High Stakes)
Do you happen to know how Cambridge looks at STEP results? For example, with A levels I know Cambridge look at your UMS in particular because they see it as a strong indicator of performance. Does Cambridge only look at the grades achieved for STEP? (S,1,2, etc.) or do they also look at the individual score?
Thanks for the links btw. Quite interesting.
Do you happen to know how Cambridge looks at STEP results? For example, with A levels I know Cambridge look at your UMS in particular because they see it as a strong indicator of performance. Does Cambridge only look at the grades achieved for STEP? (S,1,2, etc.) or do they also look at the individual score?
Thanks for the links btw. Quite interesting.
But if you only achieve, say, 1,2 instead of 1,1 then they will look at your marks to see how close you were to the boundary. They *might* decide to relax the offer if you are a near miss.
Also they might use your STEP score to help pair up supervision partners etc when you start at Cambridge.
1
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by High Stakes)
Do you happen to know how Cambridge looks at STEP results? For example, with A levels I know Cambridge look at your UMS in particular because they see it as a strong indicator of performance. Does Cambridge only look at the grades achieved for STEP? (S,1,2, etc.) or do they also look at the individual score?
Thanks for the links btw. Quite interesting.
Do you happen to know how Cambridge looks at STEP results? For example, with A levels I know Cambridge look at your UMS in particular because they see it as a strong indicator of performance. Does Cambridge only look at the grades achieved for STEP? (S,1,2, etc.) or do they also look at the individual score?
Thanks for the links btw. Quite interesting.
0
reply
Report
#8
MAT is based on C1 and C2 only
I do not like MAT.
STEP is comprehensive and has stood the test of time.
AEA is better than MAT in my opinion, and the only reason MAT exists is University politics
I do not like MAT.
STEP is comprehensive and has stood the test of time.
AEA is better than MAT in my opinion, and the only reason MAT exists is University politics
0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by Muttley79)
Quite a few Maths offers aren't achieved because of STEP requirements not being met.
Quite a few Maths offers aren't achieved because of STEP requirements not being met.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by sweeneyrod)
In fact, most maths offers are technically failed, because of STEP. IIRC, Cambridge makes 450 offers, for 250 places. Only 150 people actually achieve the required STEP grades, so they also let in the next best 100 people (who probably only narrowly missed the required grades).
In fact, most maths offers are technically failed, because of STEP. IIRC, Cambridge makes 450 offers, for 250 places. Only 150 people actually achieve the required STEP grades, so they also let in the next best 100 people (who probably only narrowly missed the required grades).
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by TeeEm)
MAT is based on C1 and C2 only
I do not like MAT.
STEP is comprehensive and has stood the test of time.
AEA is better than MAT in my opinion, and the only reason MAT exists is University politics
MAT is based on C1 and C2 only
I do not like MAT.
STEP is comprehensive and has stood the test of time.
AEA is better than MAT in my opinion, and the only reason MAT exists is University politics
0
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by RichE)
If you mean by the bold that Oxford should be using STEP as well, then one reason they don't is because its timing means it could not be used to shortlist the field of applicants. If you didn't mean that, could you elaborate?
If you mean by the bold that Oxford should be using STEP as well, then one reason they don't is because its timing means it could not be used to shortlist the field of applicants. If you didn't mean that, could you elaborate?
(to an extend this is a valid reason but the Cambridge selection procedure is better for Maths true worth)
All the best
3
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by TeeEm)
The main reason why MAT exists is purely so Oxford does not "humiliate" themselves in using a test administered by Cambridge. In order to disguise this fact the claim is that MAT is not competing with STEP as it is a test before an interview rather than a test after an interview and an offer.
(to an extend this is a valid reason but the Cambridge selection procedure is better for Maths true worth)
The main reason why MAT exists is purely so Oxford does not "humiliate" themselves in using a test administered by Cambridge. In order to disguise this fact the claim is that MAT is not competing with STEP as it is a test before an interview rather than a test after an interview and an offer.
(to an extend this is a valid reason but the Cambridge selection procedure is better for Maths true worth)
4
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by RichE)
You're of course welcome to opinions on the relative merits of the MAT and the STEP for selecting candidates, but most of the above comment is uninformed prejudice. The Oxford admissions process works around shortlisting down to 3 applicants per place prior to interview, something Oxford couldn't ever use STEP for. It is also the case that the MAT is "administered" by Cambridge Assessment and some of the Oxford tests (ELAT) are actually set by Cambridge, so I don't think the use of any of the tests boil down to matters of university pride.
You're of course welcome to opinions on the relative merits of the MAT and the STEP for selecting candidates, but most of the above comment is uninformed prejudice. The Oxford admissions process works around shortlisting down to 3 applicants per place prior to interview, something Oxford couldn't ever use STEP for. It is also the case that the MAT is "administered" by Cambridge Assessment and some of the Oxford tests (ELAT) are actually set by Cambridge, so I don't think the use of any of the tests boil down to matters of university pride.
3
reply
Report
#15
(Original post by Chief Wiggum)
Lol, this. The post you quoted was nonsense.
Lol, this. The post you quoted was nonsense.
0
reply
Report
#16
Personally, I feel the MAT is much less stressful than the STEP. The overall difficulty of getting into either of Oxford of Cambridge is the same, but Oxford is, IMO, much less stressful. It's the reason I decided to go there.
1
reply
Report
#17
I want to study E&M at Oxford and it does not require STEP. But would the university be impressed if I sit STEP exam ?
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by duonglisa)
I want to study E&M at Oxford and it does not require STEP. But would the university be impressed if I sit STEP exam ?
I want to study E&M at Oxford and it does not require STEP. But would the university be impressed if I sit STEP exam ?
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#19
(Original post by jneill)
Cambridge might be, I doubt Oxford would be that fussed. And note, its risky to sit STEP early, I wouldn't recommend it unless you are very well prepared.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Cambridge might be, I doubt Oxford would be that fussed. And note, its risky to sit STEP early, I wouldn't recommend it unless you are very well prepared.
Posted from TSR Mobile
thanks for your help! 
1
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by TeeEm)
The main reason why MAT exists is purely so Oxford does not "humiliate" themselves in using a test administered by Cambridge. In order to disguise this fact the claim is that MAT is not competing with STEP as it is a test before an interview rather than a test after an interview and an offer.
(to an extend this is a valid reason but the Cambridge selection procedure is better for Maths true worth)
All the best
The main reason why MAT exists is purely so Oxford does not "humiliate" themselves in using a test administered by Cambridge. In order to disguise this fact the claim is that MAT is not competing with STEP as it is a test before an interview rather than a test after an interview and an offer.
(to an extend this is a valid reason but the Cambridge selection procedure is better for Maths true worth)
All the best
There was pressure from state schools against the entrance examination. Oxford switched to a 4th term only admissions examination and Cambridge switched to a Sixth Term Entrance Paper.
Oxford then abolished its entrance exam and moved to a conditional offer system and Cambridge did likewise for all subjects except maths.
Oxford then found that as the pass rate for A levels climbed inexorably that A levels did not adequately discriminate between applicants. Rather than being chased down the road of requiring ever higher grades in irrelevant subjects Oxford introduced a series of short aptitude tests. MAT is one of these.
STEP is thus a legacy of a system that used to be universal at Oxbridge. MAT is part of a much newer system with a much more limited remit.
1
reply
X
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Best Cyber-Monday dealsCatch up with the top student offers
- Anxiety about uni rejections
- Nasty housemate - what should I do?
- Messed up by predicted grades
- Too easy to fall out of love