l hope l can weigh in with my two cents,
l am an ACCA affiliate who being an international student has decided to also study for the ACA, theoratically they are the same but there are some differences.
The reason l want to do this is because in my home country, there is a CA body which has mutual recognition with the ICAEW, therefore it is easier to get work if you are a CA student or qualified.
Furthermore the biggest economy in our region, where l have plans to work, has a very dominant CA body which controls registration, education and even to an extent subsidises lecturers who teach on its accredited curriculum, suffice to say the lecturers are not surprisingly all CAs.
The other thing l noted is that the ACA has many advantages in that the countries which are leading business and finance countries all recognise the ACA, this is not the case with the ACCA, e.g. Hong Kong, if you have the ACCA you have to do a number of exams, Australia the same. ln my country they were interchangeable, the local CA and the ACCA, but now the CA is miles ahead. lt is interesting to note that Canada does not give the ACCA any recognition at all unlike the other countries where you may have to do a few exams.
Therefore for me the ACA is the more marketable one if you are considering a career in the international sphere. The ACCA is well represented globally, l believe it is the largest in terms of numbers of students and members but may also be part of the problem it is maybe too common.
Exams wise the content is essentially the same with the ACCA giving options in Performance Management, Tax, Audit and Finance. With the ACA the exams are not optional. Secondly the ACA has a higher pass threshold of 55 compared to 50 for the ACCA at the comparable levels which are professional ACA and Fundamentals ACCA. At the final level they all ask the same which is fifty.
Exams wise, l also think the ACA in some parts is more challenging, take tax for instance, the ACA has three tax papers. The ACCA has two and only one is compulsory. So to me this is a huge difference.
Talking of exams, when you get to the advanced stage of the ACA, the exams are more challenging as you are expected to be working in a professional services environment so the structure, content and tone of your answer has to be more professional. l did see some of that in the ACCA but that was for audit.
The other thing l think the ACA has a more integrated exam focus than the ACCA, i.e. if you are doing a final paper e.g. business reporting, in that exam you will not only deal with corporate reporting but you will have to contend with tax, audit and other areas. So it is more challenging.
The ACCA papers are more one track, if it is audit you will deal with audit and nothing more. The last difference for me is that with the ACCA when you have done the options and you get the experience you can become a member.
The ACA has a slightly different tack, where you have to do a capstone course similar to the CIMA. ln this exam you have to write an exam which is supposed to replicate a normal working day for a CA. This means you will have preseen information and unseen information you get in the exam.
One thing l must point out is that the ACA is somewhat more expensive in fees than the ACCA so do bear this in mind. ln earlier days the ACCA was more accessible, i.e. no degree required but now so is the ACA. Also the ACA is now offered in more countries around the world so to that extent it may be closing the gap with the ACCA and lastly the ACA is more flexible than before you do not need a contract initially to study but you cannot take the capstone without fulfilling the experience elements.
For me the biggest selling point for the ACA is that is more recognised and prestigious although maybe not as prevalent as the ACA. Ultimately l think it is not what you have which matters but what you do with it. People possessing both qualifications have gone on to do amazing things.
So ultimately it is a question of where you are, what you want to do and where you want to get into it. l think either should lead to a good future so you cannot go wrong with any of the two.