"We need to talk about anonymity for rape suspects."

Then what is your answer? If we don't ask questions then we just throw the accused under the bus without proper trial, which it sounds like you would be absolutely fine with just to save someone's feelings.
If the holes are so easy then point them out, but I don't think you can, especially as you've just demonstrated extreme bias on your end.

I care about rape victims and they deserve justice, is it so wrong to believe that the accused deserves that same measure of justice?

Ah ****, here I am answering again.

We do ask questions. Of course. When we're putting the alleged rapist on trial. Who, as I pointed out to another person, is most likely a rapist at least by the time they reach trial (as an allegation with no evidence wouldn't go to trial).

That's a hole. ^^^

Extreme bias? Or caring about people?
Do I have to point out that if I've demonstrated extreme bias, so have you?

"Same measure of justice"? Nah. Punishment to fit the crime, sorry. False accusations don't deserve a full on trial, and as I said I don't think criminal status is a good idea re: the likelihood of victims to report.

Alleged rapists get anonymity until it goes to court. If it goes to court, I am willing to bet that it was not a false accusation, because to go to court you need evidence (that isn't circumstantial, e.g. DNA that could be from consensual sex. You generally need a stronger argument). "Not guilty" =/= innocent, so not convicted =/= false accusation.

I suppose. But what about cases where they knew each other, given 95% of rape is committed by someone the victim knows?

That is beyond ridiculous.

Ah ****, here I am answering again.

We do ask questions. Of course. When we're putting the alleged rapist on trial. Who, as I pointed out to another person, is most likely a rapist at least by the time they reach trial (as an allegation with no evidence wouldn't go to trial).

That's a hole. ^^^

Extreme bias? Or caring about people?
Do I have to point out that if I've demonstrated extreme bias, so have you?

"Same measure of justice"? Nah. Punishment to fit the crime, sorry. False accusations don't deserve a full on trial, and as I said I don't think criminal status is a good idea re: the likelihood of victims to report.

No, they're saying it's not a big an issue re: occurrence as rape. That's all.

I'd advise against you using the 95% figure since a simple Google search will tell you the figure fluctuates a lot based on the source, but of course that's beyond the point.

First of all, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make - if it's impossible to prove a false accusation in certain contexts, then no-one would be prosecuted. So what's the issue?

When the two people do know each other, it's a lot more difficult to prove. If the accused wishes to convict the other person, then s/he will need to provide enough evidence. How? I don't know. But the impossibility of this is also a reason why suspects, even after they're charged, should be given anonymity.

Yeah, and they managed to wangle themselves a fantastic deal on rape legislation (overturning the most basic facet of law) and don't want to rock the boat now. So now they have what they want there's no reason to start caring about the falsely accused now.

Funny that, then, I'm a feminist and I'm very vocal on this issue. But obviously the very word 'feminist' means I'm an evil man-hating monster.

Yes you should consider a new label as the feminist label is not only inherently one-sided, but has been hijacked by the aforementioned monsters.

Try egalitarian if you can stomach fighting for some men's issues once in a while.

Or maybe I could keep it, stick to its true definition (equality for both genders) and keep challenging perceptions that we're all like the radicals.

No because it isn't relevant to our time now. The term feminism was created in a time when men had more rights than women, therefore solely fighting for women's rights would contribute to equality. But now the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction, fighting solely for women's rights creates more inequality. Therefore making feminism no longer about equal rights but only female empowerment.

That's your opinion.

A compensation would be anonymity until a guilty verdict (unless waived) but the suspect is remanded in custody until trial. Imo anyway.

Yep, and anyone else who thinks that a disproportionately high suicide rate is more important than not enough female leads in video games and those pesky men that dare to say "hi" and "how are you?" on the street.

So people will have the choice of being in custody while in the eyes of the law innocent which will likely cost them at least their job or have their reputation destroyed and lose their job as well both have the potential to punish innocent people.

Mental health in general needs attention, so few doctors take you seriously over it. It's awful.

There is a difference between saying hi and asking a stranger to suck your cock.

Due to the nature of false allegations, it's almost impossible to get a reliable source. Most studies show that the figure for malicious false rape allegations lie between 4-8%. While the average for other crimes lies around 2%. As for baseless accusations, studies show that for 25-50% of rape allegations, no crime was committed.
You also have to realise that a lot of baseless allegations and malicious false allegations are stopped before anything becomes official.

I can't help but feel that this is largely driven by angry feminists and their 'rape culture' culture.