Back
to top
the UK could house 500 million of the poorest if you consider land coverage
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
The Reality
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
We have the land, if we build on it, we can in theory house and support 500 million of the poorest from Africa and Asia. So why don't we?
0
reply
SonOfTheGun
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
I don't care lol.
Would be much better to have complete open borders but abolish the welfare state, maybe have a flat tax rate and leave it at that.
Get rid of the minimum wage too.
Bring is all the refugees in the world if you want to
ChaoticButterfly
Would be much better to have complete open borders but abolish the welfare state, maybe have a flat tax rate and leave it at that.
Get rid of the minimum wage too.
Bring is all the refugees in the world if you want to
ChaoticButterfly
0
reply
The Reality
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
(Original post by SonOfTheGun)
I don't care lol.
Would be much better to have complete open borders but abolish the welfare state, maybe have a flat tax rate and leave it at that.
Get rid of the minimum wage too.
Bring is all the refugees in the world if you want to
ChaoticButterfly
I don't care lol.
Would be much better to have complete open borders but abolish the welfare state, maybe have a flat tax rate and leave it at that.
Get rid of the minimum wage too.
Bring is all the refugees in the world if you want to
ChaoticButterfly
0
reply
SonOfTheGun
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by The Reality)
But the point is, we could in theory build on all the land, since it is there. Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
But the point is, we could in theory build on all the land, since it is there. Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
Abolish income tax and only have a tax on unimproved land.
0
reply
Sephiroth
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
(Original post by The Reality)
Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
Based on your logic Russia could house the entire world and more so why don't they?
0
reply
BaronK
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by The Reality)
We have the land, if we build on it, we can in theory house and support 500 million of the poorest from Africa and Asia. So why don't we?
We have the land, if we build on it, we can in theory house and support 500 million of the poorest from Africa and Asia. So why don't we?
0
reply
Greenlaner
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report
#7
(Original post by The Reality)
But the point is, we could in theory build on all the land, since it is there. Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
But the point is, we could in theory build on all the land, since it is there. Why not build over the Lake District or new forest?
0
reply
JustANormalGuy
Badges:
8
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report
#8
The Sahara desert is empty according to my knowledge, its also quite big, why dont they build there? topkek
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
