the question is "critically evaluate why it is so difficult to register non-traditional trademarks in the EU and the UK and whether the current law is satisfactory."
I have all of the information in front of me however I am struggling to put it in structure.
Should I evaluate why it is so difficult in the first part of the essay, giving case law to demonstrate and then answer if the law is satisfactory in the second part of the essay. Or should I do it all at once and evaluate why it is so difficult and then at the end of each point state whether the law is satisfactory? Many thanks. I know this may be very confusing and I may not have articulated it very well.
Even more elitist than everyone thought?