# Vol. of Revolution

WatchPage 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

This discussion is closed.

How would you do this for a loop, eg.

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

0

Report

#2

(Original post by

How would you do this for a loop, eg.

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

**mik1a**)How would you do this for a loop, eg.

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

0

Report

#3

**mik1a**)

How would you do this for a loop, eg.

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

I'll be damned if this is right

0

(Original post by

work out the volume for the curve y=5 to which you shoudl subtract the volume generated under the curve of y=x^2+2

**hihihihi**)work out the volume for the curve y=5 to which you shoudl subtract the volume generated under the curve of y=x^2+2

I'll try it now:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

5 = x^2 + 2

x^2 = 3

x = +/- sqrt3

So length is 2sqrt2

Volume by y=5:

pi*5*5*2*sqrt2 = 50.pi.sqrt2 (vol. of cylinder)

~ 272.07

Volume by x^2 + 2

= (sqrt3/-sqrt3){ pi.(x^2 + 2)^2 dx

= 2(sqrt3/0){ pi.(x^2 + 2)^2 dx

= 2(sqrt3/0){ pi.(x^4 + 4x^2 + 4) dx

= 2pi[x^5/5 + 4x^3/3 + 4x](sqrt3/0)

= 2pi[(sqrt3)^5/5 + 4(sqrt3)^3/3 + 4(sqrt3)]

= 2pi[3^(5/2)/5 + (4/3)(3^3/2) + 4*3^(1/2)]

~ 106.65

Difference:

272.06 - 106.65 = 165.42 cube units (2d.p.)

Hmm...

0

Report

#5

I got 82.71

The cylinder has radius 5, height root3, therefore volume = 136.0349523...

then subtract the volume of the curve rotated about the x axis, I got the same volume as kimoni, so the volume of the "loop" would be 82.71. But I might have missed sumthing there...have you got the answer??

The cylinder has radius 5, height root3, therefore volume = 136.0349523...

then subtract the volume of the curve rotated about the x axis, I got the same volume as kimoni, so the volume of the "loop" would be 82.71. But I might have missed sumthing there...have you got the answer??

0

(Original post by

I got 82.71

The cylinder has radius 5, height root3, therefore volume = 136.0349523...

then subtract the volume of the curve rotated about the x axis, I got the same volume as kimoni, so the volume of the "loop" would be 82.71. But I might have missed sumthing there...have you got the answer??

**Katie Heskins**)I got 82.71

The cylinder has radius 5, height root3, therefore volume = 136.0349523...

then subtract the volume of the curve rotated about the x axis, I got the same volume as kimoni, so the volume of the "loop" would be 82.71. But I might have missed sumthing there...have you got the answer??

0

Report

#7

**mik1a**)

How would you do this for a loop, eg.

The area between the curves:

y = 5

y = x^2 + 2

Is rotated about the x-axis. Find the volume of the loop produced.

Because for another question, I found the area of the shape, squared it and multiplied it by pi, but this obviously can't be done on every occasion - the further from the x-axis, the larger the volume will be. So maybe when you square the area and times by pi you find the vol. of the shape when you rotate that shape about the x-axis when it is toughing the x-axis.

But how would you do it it it wasn't touching the x-axis? And is this needed for P2?

i actually got the same as u mikia, approx. 165

0

Report

#8

(Original post by

I made it up. But I'm sure the height is 2 root 3, because the points where they intersect are at +/- root 3, so the height is -rt3 - +rt3?

**mik1a**)I made it up. But I'm sure the height is 2 root 3, because the points where they intersect are at +/- root 3, so the height is -rt3 - +rt3?

0

Report

#9

(Original post by

haha yes you are quite right, I just assumed that it was between root 3 and 0! But u wanted it between -root 3 and root 3 hence why your answer is twice mine

**Katie Heskins**)haha yes you are quite right, I just assumed that it was between root 3 and 0! But u wanted it between -root 3 and root 3 hence why your answer is twice mine

0

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

new posts

Back

to top

to top