Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by GeologyMaths)
    Stupid errors like

    

\dfrac{1}{3} \dfrac{-1}{3}
    au lieu of
    

\dfrac{1}{3} \dfrac{-2}{3}

basically since 1/2-1 = -1/2, i think 1/3-1=-1/3
    Ouch I see.. that's not an easy one to fix I guess, apart from plugging in nice values of x to check that the expansion is roughly equal to the exact value.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Hi, does anyone know if there is a January 2015 IAL S2 paper ?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danllo)
    Hi, does anyone know if there is a January 2015 IAL S2 paper ?
    http://qualifications.pearson.com/co...e_20150122.pdf
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kingaaran;[url="tel:63518189")
    63518189[/url]]http://qualifications.pearson.com/co...e_20150122.pdf
    Thanks you !
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kingaaran;[url="tel:63518189")
    63518189[/url]]http://qualifications.pearson.com/co...e_20150122.pdf
    Thank you !
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    All of you geniuses already started doing past papers & I'm not even finished the course wait for me loool
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Does anyone do D1? How are you finding it?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KINGYusuf)
    All of you geniuses already started doing past papers & I'm not even finished the course wait for me loool
    C3,C4, yeah? How much do you have left? It's getting kinda late, isn't it?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by KINGYusuf)
    All of you geniuses already started doing past papers & I'm not even finished the course wait for me loool
    I still haven't finished, although I've worked ahead of my class. We still haven't done Vectors, Binomial expansion or solving differential equations.
    (Original post by GeologyMaths)
    Does anyone do D1? How are you finding it?
    Haven't revised it in ages, but most of it is straightforward, there are a few tricky bits, like scheduling without doing gantt charts.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dohaeris)
    C3,C4, yeah? How much do you have left? It's getting kinda late, isn't it?
    Actually, I think we finished last lesson, I was probs day dreaming then
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by KINGYusuf)
    All of you geniuses already started doing past papers & I'm not even finished the course wait for me loool
    We haven't done integration by parts and vectors yet.


    (Original post by NotNotBatman)
    Haven't revised it in ages, but most of it is straightforward, there are a few tricky bits, like scheduling without doing gantt charts.
    How are we even supposed to do that? *shrugs*
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Is there an s2 thread


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    When I approximate from Binomial to Poisson, Binomial to Normal or Poisson to Normal, do I have to change the letter ("X") to a different letter ("Y") ? For instance, X-B(1000,0.01) would be approximated to a Normal distribution, right ? In the markscheme they would put "N(10,10)".
    Would it be wrong if I put "Y-N(10,10) ?

    Now onto different point. When I Scale up a variable (such as Lamda) do I have to change the letter I first started with ? For example, there are 2 accidents in 1 week so the distribution would be X-Po(2) and I would let X be the random variable the number of accidents. If the question now said in 50 weeks, would I write X-Po(100) or Y-Po(100) ?
    Please could someone help clarify this basic point that I can't seem to get :/
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danllo)
    When I approximate from Binomial to Poisson, Binomial to Normal or Poisson to Normal, do I have to change the letter ("X" to a different letter ("Y" ? For instance, X-B(1000,0.01) would be approximated to a Normal distribution, right ? In the markscheme they would put "N(10,10)".
    Would it be wrong if I put "Y-N(10,10) ?

    Now onto different point. When I Scale up a variable (such as Lamda) do I have to change the letter I first started with ? For example, there are 2 accidents in 1 week so the distribution would be X-Po(2) and I would let X be the random variable the number of accidents. If the question now said in 50 weeks, would I write X-Po(100) or Y-Po(100) ?
    Please could someone help clarify this basic point that I can't seem to get :/
    In the first case, usually I wouldn't bother to change the variable. Perhaps make it clear it's an approximation. But I also doubt you would lose marks if you said you were approximating X by the variable Y with that distribution, so long as at the end you give your approximate answer in terms of X.

    In the second case, I probably would change the name (and say what you're doing and what exactly the new variable is).
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 13 1 20 8 42)
    In the first case, usually I wouldn't bother to change the variable. Perhaps make it clear it's an approximation. But I also doubt you would lose marks if you said you were approximating X by the variable Y with that distribution, so long as at the end you give your approximate answer in terms of X.
    My stats teacher told me that we have to change the variable for your approximation. So suppose you have X ~ B(1000, 0.01), \displaystyle X\sim \mathrm{B}\left ( 1000, 0.01 \right ) \Longleftrightarrow X\approx Y \sim\mathrm{Po}\left ( 1 \right ). :dontknow: He even cut marks for not "renaming" the variable. It gets very annoying having multiple variables denoted by different letters.

    Maybe someone can correct me here?
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by aymanzayedmannan)
    My stats teacher told me that we have to change the variable for your approximation. So suppose you have X ~ B(1000, 0.01), \displaystyle X\sim \mathrm{B}\left ( 1000, 0.01 \right ) \Longleftrightarrow X\approx Y \sim\mathrm{Po}\left ( 1 \right ). :dontknow: He even cut marks for not "renaming" the variable. It gets very annoying having multiple variables denoted by different letters.

    Maybe someone can correct me here?
    I didn't and it all turned out fine - but tiny hobbit also suggested the change of variable too, so I'd go with that.

    What I used to do was X \sim B(1000, 0.01) \Rightarrow X \approx \mathrm{Po}(1)
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Are there any new papers on the crash maths website yet ?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danllo)
    When I approximate from Binomial to Poisson, Binomial to Normal or Poisson to Normal, do I have to change the letter ("X") to a different letter ("Y") ? For instance, X-B(1000,0.01) would be approximated to a Normal distribution, right ? In the markscheme they would put "N(10,10)".
    Would it be wrong if I put "Y-N(10,10) ?

    Now onto different point. When I Scale up a variable (such as Lamda) do I have to change the letter I first started with ? For example, there are 2 accidents in 1 week so the distribution would be X-Po(2) and I would let X be the random variable the number of accidents. If the question now said in 50 weeks, would I write X-Po(100) or Y-Po(100) ?
    Please could someone help clarify this basic point that I can't seem to get :/
    (Original post by 13 1 20 8 42)
    In the first case, usually I wouldn't bother to change the variable. Perhaps make it clear it's an approximation. But I also doubt you would lose marks if you said you were approximating X by the variable Y with that distribution, so long as at the end you give your approximate answer in terms of X.

    In the second case, I probably would change the name (and say what you're doing and what exactly the new variable is).
    (Original post by aymanzayedmannan)
    My stats teacher told me that we have to change the variable for your approximation. So suppose you have X ~ B(1000, 0.01), \displaystyle X\sim \mathrm{B}\left ( 1000, 0.01 \right ) \Longleftrightarrow X\approx Y \sim\mathrm{Po}\left ( 1 \right ). :dontknow: He even cut marks for not "renaming" the variable. It gets very annoying having multiple variables denoted by different letters.

    Maybe someone can correct me here?
    (Original post by Zacken)
    I didn't and it all turned out fine - but tiny hobbit also suggested the change of variable too, so I'd go with that.

    What I used to do was X \sim B(1000, 0.01) \Rightarrow X \approx \mathrm{Po}(1)
    It wouldn't matter as far as marks go (I'm talking Edexcel here). The important thing is that you are clear as to which variable you are using at any given moment and what its distribution is. If using a different letter keeps it clear for you, then that's a good thing.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tiny hobbit)
    It wouldn't matter as far as marks go (I'm talking Edexcel here). The important thing is that you are clear as to which variable you are using at any given moment and what its distribution is. If using a different letter keeps it clear for you, then that's a good thing.
    Thank you!

    I have another (possibly silly) question: on the paper, you're always asked to state your hypotheses clearly. Does this make it alright to just simply state p= 0.25 or do we have to write everything out in words?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by aymanzayedmannan)
    Thank you!

    I have another (possibly silly) question: on the paper, you're always asked to state your hypotheses clearly. Does this make it alright to just simply state p= 0.25 or do we have to write everything out in words?
    You need to say (e.g.)

    H0: p = 0.25
    H1: p > 0.25 (or whatever the inequality is)

    Similar pattern for Poisson, replacing p with lambda
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: June 22, 2017
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.