The Student Room Group

Reputation of Downing's Law

Hey all,

I was just wondering: Why is it that Downing college has a unique reputation for Law? Does this mean that the other colleges are comparatively not as good? It doesn't seem to make sense since they're all Cambridge..

I guess what I'd like to know is why there's this difference or distinguishing factor, and whether it's so different as to say that Jesus college and Downing (for example) are two worlds apart since both fall in the category Cambridge University. :confused:

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Firz
Hey all,

I was just wondering: Why is it that Downing college has a unique reputation for Law? Does this mean that the other colleges are comparatively not as good? It doesn't seem to make sense since they're all Cambridge..

I guess what I'd like to know is why there's this difference or distinguishing factor, and whether it's so different as to say that Jesus college and Downing (for example) are two worlds apart since both fall in the category Cambridge University. :confused:


I didn't know that Downing had a reputation for law. If you've read a few of the recent threads, you'll know that there are very little differences between the colleges as the teaching is university based. Even your supervisors will likely be from other colleges.

Reply 2

Hm..it seems to have one for Law. Also, upon checking the stats Downing has an unusually high number of applicants for Law, something along the lines of 13/75 as opposed to the other colleges, which have a much lesser number of applicants. It's interesting to hear that the supervisors interchange, never heard that one before.

Reply 3

Firz
Hm..it seems to have one for Law. Also, upon checking the stats Downing has an unusually high number of applicants for Law, something along the lines of 13/75 as opposed to the other colleges, which have a much lesser number of applicants. It's interesting to hear that the supervisors interchange, never heard that one before.


I think it's the case for most if not all subjects.

Application stats are really dodgy things. Obviously it varies year on year like the Tompkins table. I really would advise against deciding on a college this way.

There's a good sticky thread on how to choose a college at the top of the Cambridge forum.

Reply 4

I'm not talking about methods of choosing colleges, I'm just wondering about the reputation Downing has for Law - how it received it and whether it's justified. I agree that stats can be rather poor indicators but Cambridge's website has stats for the past 4-5 years, and overall Downing has far more applicants than most of the other colleges for this field (although I think one or two come close to those numbers).

If Downing in general has more applicants for all subjects/in general, do you by any chance know why this could be the case?

o_o

Reply 5

Firz
I'm not talking about methods of choosing colleges, I'm just wondering about the reputation Downing has for Law - how it received it and whether it's justified. I agree that stats can be rather poor indicators but Cambridge's website has stats for the past 4-5 years, and overall Downing has far more applicants than most of the other colleges for this field (although I think one or two come close to those numbers).

If Downing in general has more applicants for all subjects/in general, do you by any chance know why this could be the case?

o_o



If you really want to know, then ask the Downing people in the Downing thread. I've told you that the college you go to has almost no bearing on the quality of teaching you receive.

Reputations are often based on perceptions and as we all know perceptions are very often different to reality.

Reply 6

Firz
I'm not talking about methods of choosing colleges, I'm just wondering about the reputation Downing has for Law - how it received it and whether it's justified. I agree that stats can be rather poor indicators but Cambridge's website has stats for the past 4-5 years, and overall Downing has far more applicants than most of the other colleges for this field (although I think one or two come close to those numbers).

If Downing in general has more applicants for all subjects/in general, do you by any chance know why this could be the case?

o_o

Self-fulfilling prophecy kind of thing - students do well one year, get recognised as such, then people like you who do in-depth research into the colleges see that it is supposedly the best college for law. Consequently the best candidates apply there and the weaker ones don't because they are scared off by the reputation and think the college only takes ready-made lawyers. End result: Downing does best come exam time. Same can be said for history at Pembroke, Clare, Emma.

Having said that though, as others have remarked there isn't much point picking a college for its reputation in a subject, better to pick it because they have an academic there you like/love the place by all means. It's not as though you'll get any special advantages law-wise by being at Downing, you'll have lectures with others, get supervised outside college for most if not all aspects of the course etc etc.

Reply 7

I *think* Downing was the first to do the Law Double-Maitrise.

Reply 8

Downing is generally regarded as the Law college.

I'm not 100% sure why, but apparently our fellows are better or something.

Tha actual students suck though :p: - just kidding if any are reading, they're better than natscis :p:

Reply 9

i think downing have quite a few law felows compared to other colleges and they admit more applicants per year or something like that.

anyway, its usually only if you're in a small college that you have supervisions in other colleges. downing is a pretty large college (especially for law) so i would think you mainly stay in your college for supervisions.

Reply 10

jason_88
i think downing have quite a few law felows compared to other colleges and they admit more applicants per year or something like that.

anyway, its usually only if you're in a small college that you have supervisions in other colleges. downing is a pretty large college (especially for law) so i would think you mainly stay in your college for supervisions.


Catz is bigger than Downing for your information.

Reply 11

Ah okay, so some possible reasons:

-Downing was the first to do Double Maitrise (I think you're right on this one Stick Man :smile:)
-I can confirm that Downing (according to application stats) doesn't have the most number of law students
-Doing well in the actual exams is probably another reason like White_redrose says, but in the end I believe you guys are right in that it depends on who you are and which college you find the most preferable.

:biggrin: Right?

Reply 12

Firz
Ah okay, so some possible reasons:

-Downing was the first to do Double Maitrise (I think you're right on this one Stick Man :smile:)
-I can confirm that Downing (according to application stats) doesn't have the most number of law students
-Doing well in the actual exams is probably another reason like White_redrose says, but in the end I believe you guys are right in that it depends on who you are and which college you find the most preferable.

:biggrin: Right?


Bingo. I'd imagine the lawyers at Downing get the occasional 'ooh' or 'wow' when they say that is where they are, but to be honest, law is competitive wherever you do it!

Reply 13

Nick Griffin did law at Downing.

Just thought id add that :smile:

Reply 14

Ah, I see from your profile you are American. OK, he is leader of the British National Party whose aim is more or less to be as extreme and bigoted as is possible combined with more or less chucking any ethnic minority or non-British people out of the country.

Basically a neo-nazi and a white supremacist.

Kind of like George Bush I guess :tongue:.

Reply 15

Oh by the way, don't let that put you off, Im sure Downing is a brilliant place to be :smile: Everyone has their share of nutters, its just the way life is.

Reply 16

Downing is regarded as a "law" college. Its fellows include one of the most loved lecturers of all time, Graham Virgo, the frequently-gesticulating Amy Goymour, and the all-round good egg that is Prof Feldman.

I know this, of course, because they lecture me too; since all law students are lectured together, and the faculty, not the college arrange supervisions (though there is a tendency to keep within college - I only have one supervisor outside my college), there isn't a massive difference in teaching quality.

I think it's fair to say that all fellows in all colleges are far more intelligent than most of the students they supervise, so basically any college is good.

Downing does, of course, have loads more applicants, so you're less likely to get in.

Reply 17

Heartbreaker
Ah, I see from your profile you are American. OK, he is leader of the British National Party whose aim is more or less to be as extreme and bigoted as is possible combined with more or less chucking any ethnic minority or non-British people out of the country.

Basically a neo-nazi and a white supremacist.

Kind of like George Bush I guess :tongue:.


XD That is absolutely hilarious. The other day, actually, I had to write up a short summary on an article by a politician who compared Jonah (of the bible) to George Bush, citing the fact that while Jonah was unlucky, George Bush was just plain incompetent. :p:

Jim Arnold
Downing is regarded as a "law" college. Its fellows include one of the most loved lecturers of all time, Graham Virgo, the frequently-gesticulating Amy Goymour, and the all-round good egg that is Prof Feldman.

I know this, of course, because they lecture me too; since all law students are lectured together, and the faculty, not the college arrange supervisions (though there is a tendency to keep within college - I only have one supervisor outside my college), there isn't a massive difference in teaching quality.

I think it's fair to say that all fellows in all colleges are far more intelligent than most of the students they supervise, so basically any college is good.

Downing does, of course, have loads more applicants, so you're less likely to get in.


Probably a good and very obvious point there, that all fellows are more than capable of teaching undergraduate students :wink: If I ever get the chance I hope to meet some of these professors you talk about, they seem to have quite interesting characters.

Downing definitely has more applicants and is more than twice as hard to get into than any other college.

I've noticed that from year to year the student intake varies slightly - does this mean there is no fixed number of applicants they accept? Further extending this thought, does this also mean that in other, unsubscribed, colleges, they will not pick candidates who only apply to their college even if they're short of people, but would rather reject than to accept a candidate who may not be suitable?

Reply 18

Look at the stats for Fitz, for years they didn't take in a single lawyer who applied directly to the college
Variations between years depend on
Quality of students who apply
Fellows etc avaiable for being director of studies, if a fellow is taking a sabbatical
quality of other students within the college who apply - a college can only take in a certain number of students
number of applicants being taken in to the department, some subjects limit thje number of students each colege can take

Reply 19

"[Nick Griffin all round bigot and general hate-monger] graduated with a Third Class (3rd) degree in History with Law."

One person I quite like to see wasn't so successful!