x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Approximating Poisson as Normal watch

1. If I had a Poisson distribution and I wish to approximate it with .

Say I want to find for some non-natural , e.g: .

Assuming that , would the continuity correction be ?

In the case of , I understand that it would be .

What if it was , would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be or ?

I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
2. (Original post by Zacken)
If I had a Poisson distribution and I wish to approximate it with .

Say I want to find for some non-natural , e.g: .

Assuming that , would the continuity correction be ?

In the case of , I understand that it would be .

What if it was , would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be or ?

I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
I claim that X can only take integer values, so round up, e.g. X>83.3 actually means X >= 84. Now apply the continuity correction in the usual way, so the bar for 84 should be included, so the normal distribution gives x >= 83.5 (or x>83.5, it doesn't matter which since x is continuous).
3. (Original post by tiny hobbit)
I claim that X can only take integer values, so round up, e.g. X>83.3 actually means X >= 84. Now apply the continuity correction in the usual way, so the bar for 84 should be included, so the normal distribution gives x >= 83.5 (or x>83.5, it doesn't matter which since x is continuous).
Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

Let's say I had and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

Is that good?
4. (Original post by Zacken)
If I had a Poisson distribution and I wish to approximate it with .

Say I want to find for some non-natural , e.g: .

Assuming that , would the continuity correction be ?

In the case of , I understand that it would be .

What if it was , would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be or ?

I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
in a Poisson you cannot have anything but x=0,1,2,3,...
5. (Original post by Zacken)
Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

Let's say I had and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

Is that good?

not sure how you got x = 250/3 earlier... poisson is all about integers
6. (Original post by Zacken)
Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

Let's say I had and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

Is that good?
Ok until the last move. You haven't included the bar. X<=25 becomes X<25.5 when you change to the normal distribution.

I think it would be clearer to use a different letter when you change to the normal distribution, e.g. X ~ Po(L), Y ~ N(L,L)
7. (Original post by Zacken)
If I had a Poisson distribution and I wish to approximate it with .

Say I want to find for some non-natural , e.g: .

Assuming that , would the continuity correction be ?

In the case of , I understand that it would be .

What if it was , would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be or ?

I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
Latex skillz.

But yeah, integers. Those bad boys.
8. (Original post by tiny hobbit)
Ok until the last move. You haven't included the bar. X<=25 becomes X<25.5 when you change to the normal distribution.
Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.

I think it would be clearer to use a different letter when you change to the normal distribution, e.g. X ~ Po(L), Y ~ N(L,L)
Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
9. (Original post by the bear)

not sure how you got x = 250/3 earlier... poisson is all about integers
Yay.

It was part of a question where the scenario was something like 1 item is m pounds.

Find the probability that you earn 250/3 * m pounds for some number m I can't remember. In hindsight, it was fairly obvious that I needed to round up. Poisson.

Thanks!
10. (Original post by C0pper)
Latex skillz.

But yeah, integers. Those bad boys.
You talk too much. Have I mentioned that before?
11. (Original post by TeeEm)
in a Poisson you cannot have anything but x=0,1,2,3,...
thanks!
12. (Original post by Zacken)
You talk too much. Have I mentioned that before?
'Pot kettle black' springs to mind. Now stop messaging me and go revise.
13. (Original post by C0pper)
'Pot kettle black' springs to mind. Now stop messaging me and go revise.
No.
14. (Original post by Zacken)
Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.

Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
Easiest way to think of continuity corrections is just to imagine them as you would with ranges for GCSE. For example, if you had that x>=25, then if you took the case that x =25 to 2 significant figures than the true value of x is 24.5<=x<25.5. Therefore if x>=24.5 in continuous , x>= 25 in poisson so you should easily be able to see which way the correction should go
15. (Original post by Zacken)
Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.
Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
Whether or not you include the bar depends on the type of inequality sign, not on which side of the mean you are.

See if the example in the attachment helps.
Attached Files
16. III Normal distribution as an approximation to the Poisson distribution.docx (190.5 KB, 45 views)
17. (Original post by tiny hobbit)
Whether or not you include the bar depends on the type of inequality sign, not on which side of the mean you are.

See if the example in the attachment helps.
I don't know how number lines work, apparently. Stupid mistake, thanks for clearing up the thing though!
18. (Original post by Zacken)
I don't know how number lines work, apparently. Stupid mistake, thanks for clearing up the thing though!
We need a "like" button.
19. (Original post by tiny hobbit)
We need a "like" button.

Thanks again.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 28, 2016
Today on TSR

### Negatives of studying at Oxbridge

What are the downsides?

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams