Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    If I had a Poisson distribution X \sim \text{Po}(\lambda) and I wish to approximate it with x \sim N(\lambda, \lambda).

    Say I want to find \mathbb{P}(X > x) for some non-natural x, e.g: \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3.

    Assuming that x > \lambda, would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X > \frac{\floor{x} + \frac{1}{2} - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    In the case of x = \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3, I understand that it would be \displaystyle \matbb{P}\left(\frac{83.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right).

    What if it was x = 83.6, would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X > \frac{84.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right) or \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(\frac{84 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    If I had a Poisson distribution X \sim \text{Po}(\lambda) and I wish to approximate it with x \sim N(\lambda, \lambda).

    Say I want to find \mathbb{P}(X > x) for some non-natural x, e.g: \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3.

    Assuming that x > \lambda, would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X > \frac{\floor{x} + \frac{1}{2} - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    In the case of x = \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3, I understand that it would be \displaystyle \matbb{P}\left(\frac{83.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right).

    What if it was x = 83.6, would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X > \frac{84.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right) or \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(\frac{84 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
    I claim that X can only take integer values, so round up, e.g. X>83.3 actually means X >= 84. Now apply the continuity correction in the usual way, so the bar for 84 should be included, so the normal distribution gives x >= 83.5 (or x>83.5, it doesn't matter which since x is continuous).
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tiny hobbit)
    I claim that X can only take integer values, so round up, e.g. X>83.3 actually means X >= 84. Now apply the continuity correction in the usual way, so the bar for 84 should be included, so the normal distribution gives x >= 83.5 (or x>83.5, it doesn't matter which since x is continuous).
    Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

    Let's say I had x &lt; \lambda and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

    Is that good?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    If I had a Poisson distribution X \sim \text{Po}(\lambda) and I wish to approximate it with x \sim N(\lambda, \lambda).

    Say I want to find \mathbb{P}(X &gt; x) for some non-natural x, e.g: \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3.

    Assuming that x &gt; \lambda, would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X &gt; \frac{\floor{x} + \frac{1}{2} - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    In the case of x = \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3, I understand that it would be \displaystyle \matbb{P}\left(\frac{83.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right).

    What if it was x = 83.6, would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X &gt; \frac{84.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right) or \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(\frac{84 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
    in a Poisson you cannot have anything but x=0,1,2,3,...
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

    Let's say I had x &lt; \lambda and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

    Is that good?
    :borat:

    not sure how you got x = 250/3 earlier... poisson is all about integers
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Okay, that makes a ton of sense. Just to check to see if I understand:

    Let's say I had x &lt; \lambda and x = 25.5, and I want P(X < 25.5), then that's the same thing as P(X <= 25) (round down) so continuity correct to X < 24.5 because I need to include the bar.

    Is that good?
    Ok until the last move. You haven't included the bar. X<=25 becomes X<25.5 when you change to the normal distribution.

    I think it would be clearer to use a different letter when you change to the normal distribution, e.g. X ~ Po(L), Y ~ N(L,L)
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    If I had a Poisson distribution X \sim \text{Po}(\lambda) and I wish to approximate it with x \sim N(\lambda, \lambda).

    Say I want to find \mathbb{P}(X &gt; x) for some non-natural x, e.g: \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3.

    Assuming that x &gt; \lambda, would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X &gt; \frac{\floor{x} + \frac{1}{2} - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    In the case of x = \frac{250}{3} \approx 83.3, I understand that it would be \displaystyle \matbb{P}\left(\frac{83.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right).

    What if it was x = 83.6, would it be the same as the above or would the continuity correction be \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(X &gt; \frac{84.5 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right) or \displaystyle \mathbb{P}\left(\frac{84 - \lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\right)?

    I'm not entirely sure how to visualise this - do I draw the usual rectangle centred around 83 and then continuity correct from there, in which case x=83.6 would yield a continuity correction of x' = 83.5?
    Latex skillz.

    But yeah, integers. Those bad boys.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tiny hobbit)
    Ok until the last move. You haven't included the bar. X<=25 becomes X<25.5 when you change to the normal distribution.
    Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.

    I think it would be clearer to use a different letter when you change to the normal distribution, e.g. X ~ Po(L), Y ~ N(L,L)
    Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is X \approx Y standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    :borat:

    not sure how you got x = 250/3 earlier... poisson is all about integers
    Yay.

    It was part of a question where the scenario was something like 1 item is m pounds.

    Find the probability that you earn 250/3 * m pounds for some number m I can't remember. In hindsight, it was fairly obvious that I needed to round up. Poisson. :facepalm:

    Thanks!
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0pper)
    Latex skillz.

    But yeah, integers. Those bad boys.
    You talk too much. Have I mentioned that before?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TeeEm)
    in a Poisson you cannot have anything but x=0,1,2,3,...
    :yep: thanks!
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    You talk too much. Have I mentioned that before?
    'Pot kettle black' springs to mind. Now stop messaging me and go revise.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0pper)
    'Pot kettle black' springs to mind. Now stop messaging me and go revise.
    No.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.



    Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is X \approx Y standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
    Easiest way to think of continuity corrections is just to imagine them as you would with ranges for GCSE. For example, if you had that x>=25, then if you took the case that x =25 to 2 significant figures than the true value of x is 24.5<=x<25.5. Therefore if x>=24.5 in continuous , x>= 25 in poisson so you should easily be able to see which way the correction should go
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Are you sure? I'm saying that x is less than the mean - so including the bar means moving close to the mean, i.e: rightwards on the 'x'-axis.
    Okay, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I'd been meaning to ask about that - is there notation for saying that X is approximately distributed by Y? Is X \approx Y standard? It looks out of place, so I'm going to guess no.
    Whether or not you include the bar depends on the type of inequality sign, not on which side of the mean you are.

    See if the example in the attachment helps.
    Attached Files
  1. File Type: docx III Normal distribution as an approximation to the Poisson distribution.docx (190.5 KB, 45 views)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tiny hobbit)
    Whether or not you include the bar depends on the type of inequality sign, not on which side of the mean you are.

    See if the example in the attachment helps.
    :facepalm: I don't know how number lines work, apparently. Stupid mistake, thanks for clearing up the thing though!
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    :facepalm: I don't know how number lines work, apparently. Stupid mistake, thanks for clearing up the thing though!
    We need a "like" button.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tiny hobbit)
    We need a "like" button.
    :lol:

    Thanks again.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: January 28, 2016
Poll
Are you going to a festival?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.