Back
to top
I'm a bit confused
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Emupa
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Hey 
I'm doing EPQ right now on how life evolved and whether it could arise on other planets - I found this book that talks about oxygen. The first chapter says "life must have evolved in an atmosphere that contained very little methane, hydrogen or ammonia" and then later on says "To summarise, life evolved in a primordial soup, with a planetary atmosphere containing methane, ammonia and hydrogen"
I'm not sure which part to trust!? Is this guy completely contradicting himself, or should I just assume I'm misunderstanding what he's saying? Which view do you think is 'right' or at least closest to the truth?
Thanks!
I'm doing EPQ right now on how life evolved and whether it could arise on other planets - I found this book that talks about oxygen. The first chapter says "life must have evolved in an atmosphere that contained very little methane, hydrogen or ammonia" and then later on says "To summarise, life evolved in a primordial soup, with a planetary atmosphere containing methane, ammonia and hydrogen"
I'm not sure which part to trust!? Is this guy completely contradicting himself, or should I just assume I'm misunderstanding what he's saying? Which view do you think is 'right' or at least closest to the truth?
Thanks!
0
reply
rayquaza17
Badges:
17
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
(Original post by Emupa)
Hey
I'm doing EPQ right now on how life evolved and whether it could arise on other planets - I found this book that talks about oxygen. The first chapter says "life must have evolved in an atmosphere that contained very little methane, hydrogen or ammonia" and then later on says "To summarise, life evolved in a primordial soup, with a planetary atmosphere containing methane, ammonia and hydrogen"
I'm not sure which part to trust!? Is this guy completely contradicting himself, or should I just assume I'm misunderstanding what he's saying? Which view do you think is 'right' or at least closest to the truth?
Thanks!
Hey
I'm doing EPQ right now on how life evolved and whether it could arise on other planets - I found this book that talks about oxygen. The first chapter says "life must have evolved in an atmosphere that contained very little methane, hydrogen or ammonia" and then later on says "To summarise, life evolved in a primordial soup, with a planetary atmosphere containing methane, ammonia and hydrogen"
I'm not sure which part to trust!? Is this guy completely contradicting himself, or should I just assume I'm misunderstanding what he's saying? Which view do you think is 'right' or at least closest to the truth?
Thanks!
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
