x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# n-point Wightman functions (notation confusion) watch

1. The problem I am trying to solve is trivial, but I am struggling with notation. I have a recursive formula for the nth Wightman function,

,

where indicates that the kth argument has been 'cancelled'. I also know that and .

The question is to find . Intuitively it looks like the answer should be zero, as it will be some product of the n-point Wightman functions with odd n. This includes , and so .

However, syntactically the recursion formula doesn't actually seem to work. If we let in the formula, we get

.

The next step would be to use the recursion formula again to compute

,

but this doesn't seem to be possible since in the formula the subscripts on W and the final argument are equal, and this isn't the case here.

Specifically, if we let in the formula, we get an expression for

,

and if we let in the formula, we get an expression for

.

Neither of these is what we want: the former has the wrong arguments, and the latter is the wrong function!
2. As an example I have looked at the 4-point functions. Using the formula,

.

But then we can't use the formula because the formula tells us how to compute the nth function with n arguments, where we now have nth functions with n+1 arguments...
3. (Original post by Implication)
The problem I am trying to solve is trivial, but I am struggling with notation. I have a recursive formula for the nth Wightman function,

,
Eek! It's over thirty years since I studied quantum field theory and the neurons where it was kept have long since been retired. However...

There does seem to be a serious problem with this formula as the left hand side implies that is a function of n variables, whereas the right hand side is a sum of 's that appear to be functions of n-1 variables. Unless that is doing something weird. Remind me, what is it? Something nasty with distributions?
4. (Original post by Implication)
As an example I have looked at the 4-point functions. Using the formula,

.

But then we can't use the formula because the formula tells us how to compute the nth function with n arguments, where we now have nth functions with n+1 arguments...
Exactly. Where have you got the formula from?
5. (Original post by Implication)
The problem I am trying to solve is trivial, but I am struggling with notation. I have a recursive formula for the nth Wightman function,

,
I've found something like this formula in Roepstorff's "Path Integral Approach to Quantum Physics", and there the formula is:

,

So is this just a typo situation?
6. (Original post by Gregorius)
I've found something like this formula in Roepstorff's "Path Integral Approach to Quantum Physics", and there the formula is:

,

So is this just a typo situation?
Yes! The formula I posted was lifted straight from the teacher's lecture notes for the course. I compared it to the textbook and thought it was the same, but I've just quadruple checked and discovered that the arguments on the (n-2)th function should start from x_2, not x_1:

That means that the first x is omitted as well as the kth and right number of arguments are there after all and everything works out fine

The formula you've posted looks like it should work out to be equivalent to this (corrected) version. I've checked for n=4 and it gives the same so thank you very much! This is like a weight off my shoulders haha, I went to chat to my lecturer about it and she just didn't understand what my problem was so it's good to know I wasn't going crazy
7. (Original post by Implication)
This is like a weight off my shoulders haha, I went to chat to my lecturer about it and she just didn't understand what my problem was so it's good to know I wasn't going crazy

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 30, 2016
Today on TSR

### Loughborough better than Cambridge

Loughborough at number one

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams