My question is;
Explain how the verification principle has challenged themeaningfulness of religious language and summaries how religion has respondedto that challenge. (30)
do you think i should be talking about the falsification principle by Flew or not?
my plan is to start with verification and my responses will be R.M. Hare (Bliks) Hick (Eschatological verification) and Wittgenstein (Language games)
just wondering where the falsification Principle would fit in??
Turn on thread page Beta
You are Here: Home > Forums >< Study Help >< Arts and humanities academic help >< Philosophy, religious studies and theology study help
Should i include the falsification principle in this? watch
- Thread Starter
- 29-01-2016 19:00
- 21-02-2016 23:09
I think you should talk about the falsification principle because you are talking about how verification has challenged RL. Therefore you could talk about the weaknesses of RL which led to the development of the falsification principle