Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Stockholm pogrom: Crowd of masked men hunt and beat up non-Swedes Watch

    • Political Ambassador
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anosmianAcrimony)
    Even if that were true, responding to news of crimes perpetrated by a few members of an ethnic group by going out and indiscriminately beating up anyone who might be in that ethnic group is undeniably a bigoted act. It's not racism, exactly, because immigrants were targeted rather than any particular race, but it's very similar.
    Dont get me wrong I aint endorsing what they did in Sweden, I was replying to what Jebedee was replying too
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    So you're defending the boston bombers and the taliban, much better.

    Attachment 499217
    Lol how does my comment in anyway corelate to the boston bombers?
    And please tell me what have the Taliban done to us? As im aware they are a pashtun nationalist group who have not touched British or American land.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anosmianAcrimony)
    He's not defending anyone. He's saying that the actions of these thugs and of the other terrorists you mentioned are heinous in much the same way. I'm inclined to agree.
    Sorry, I can't hear you.

    I don't negotiate with terrorists.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    Sorry, I can't hear you.

    I don't negotiate with terrorists.
    Wtf are you on about? I'm not a terrorist, he's not a terrorist, and neither of us are defending terrorists!
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    Lol how does my comment in anyway corelate to the boston bombers?
    And please tell me what have the Taliban done to us? As im aware they are a pashtun nationalist group who have not touched British or American land.
    Here it comes. The taliban defence league out in full force.

    Perhaps trying to let Bin Laden get away with 9/11, thus starting the war in Afghanistan.

    "The United States requested the Taliban to shut down all al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, open them to inspection and turn over Osama bin Laden. The Taliban refused all these requests. Instead they offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to an Islamic country, for trial under Islamic law, if the United States presented evidence of his guilt."

    "
    The Taliban had previously refused to extradite bin Laden to the United States, or prosecute him, after he was indicted by the US federal courts for involvement in the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. The Taliban deemed eyewitness testimony and satellite phone call recordings entered in the public record in February 2001 during a trial as insufficient grounds to extradite bin Laden for his involvement in the bombings."

    There's literally a whole section on wikipedia dedicated to their human rights abuses you nutjob.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliba..._rights_abuses

    Name:  uwotm8.jpg
Views: 39
Size:  29.2 KB
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anosmianAcrimony)
    He's not defending anyone. He's saying that the actions of these thugs and of the other terrorists you mentioned are heinous in much the same way. I'm inclined to agree.
    To add to this, should sweden, or God forbid, the UK become lawless states with most infrastructure destroyed, neo-nazi carbon copies of terror cells such as isis, al nusra etc... will pop up left right and centre too.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anosmianAcrimony)
    Wtf are you on about? I'm not a terrorist, he's not a terrorist, and neither of us are defending terrorists!
    Read his most recent reply lol. He basically said that because the taliban hadn't invaded Britain there's nothing wrong with them.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    Here it comes. The taliban defence league out in full force.

    Perhaps trying to let Bin Laden get away with 9/11, thus starting the war in Afghanistan.

    "The United States requested the Taliban to shut down all al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, open them to inspection and turn over Osama bin Laden. The Taliban refused all these requests. Instead they offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to an Islamic country, for trial under Islamic law, if the United States presented evidence of his guilt."

    "
    The Taliban had previously refused to extradite bin Laden to the United States, or prosecute him, after he was indicted by the US federal courts for involvement in the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. The Taliban deemed eyewitness testimony and satellite phone call recordings entered in the public record in February 2001 during a trial as insufficient grounds to extradite bin Laden for his involvement in the bombings."

    There's literally a whole section on wikipedia dedicated to their human rights abuses you nutjob.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliba..._rights_abuses

    Name:  uwotm8.jpg
Views: 39
Size:  29.2 KB
    Ok and where was the direct offensive attacks on US lives on US soil that gave the US permission to invade Afghanistan? I bet you also approve of the invasion of Iraq?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    To add to this, should sweden, or God forbid, the UK become lawless states with most infrastructure destroyed, neo-nazi carbon copies of terror cells such as isis, al nusra etc... will pop up left right and centre too.
    "Hurr durr if aliens destroyed the world everybody left would be a banana"
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    Read his most recent reply lol. He basically said that because the taliban hadn't invaded Britain there's nothing wrong with them.
    I never said nothing wrong with them. I could write a 1000 page book on their faults and still need a volume 2 to be finished. But what right do we have to tell others what and what not to do in THEIR OWN LANDS yet we go out and beat to a pulp those we dislike like that has occured in Sweden?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    "Hurr durr if aliens destroyed the world everybody left would be a banana"
    Class reply.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    What if the races were reversed?

    What if you had to except millions of people that are different to you, have a different culture and religion. You are made a foreigner in your homeland. On top of that these people are raping and killing you at a disproportionate number. There's also other issues like the cost because many will be on welfare.


    I don't expect most of you will understand or give a damn. Then if this is the case, I see no reason why we should give a damn about these people.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    Ok and where was the direct offensive attacks on US lives on US soil that gave the US permission to invade Afghanistan?
    Are you saying that the only offensive action is a direct invasion, and that the only reason for intervention is invasion? I bet if I asked you what you thought of Libya you'd explain with contradictions. U be cuckoo. Here's a passage about your favourite organisation... the taliban:

    "16 IEDs have been planted in girls' schools" by the Taliban"
    "Female suicide bombers are increasingly common."
    "Sohaila, a young woman who was convicted of walking with a man who was not a relative, was charged with adultery. She was publicly flogged in Ghazi Stadium and received 100 lashes."
    "According to a 55-page report by the United Nations, the Taliban, while trying to consolidate control over northern and western Afghanistan, committed systematic massacres against civilians."
    "In 1998, the United Nations accused the Taliban of denying emergency food by the UN's World Food Programme to 160,000 hungry and starving people "for political and military reasons"

    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    I bet you also approve of the invasion of Iraq?
    Irrelevant and false.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    But what right do we have to tell others what and what not to do in THEIR OWN LANDS yet we go out and beat to a pulp those we dislike like that has occured in Sweden?
    Strawman fallacy m8

    Name:  1343416724812.png
Views: 53
Size:  96.3 KB
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    Are you saying that the only offensive action is a direct invasion, and that the only reason for intervention is invasion? I bet if I asked you what you thought of Libya you'd explain with contradictions. U be cuckoo. Here's a passage about your favourite organisation... the taliban:

    "16 IEDs have been planted in girls' schools" by the Taliban"
    "Female suicide bombers are increasingly common."
    "Sohaila, a young woman who was convicted of walking with a man who was not a relative, was charged with adultery. She was publicly flogged in Ghazi Stadium and received 100 lashes."
    "According to a 55-page report by the United Nations, the Taliban, while trying to consolidate control over northern and western Afghanistan, committed systematic massacres against civilians."
    "In 1998, the United Nations accused the Taliban of denying emergency food by the UN's World Food Programme to 160,000 hungry and starving people "for political and military reasons"



    Irrelevant and false.
    So we have a moral right to invade a nation because they did some bad? Our (NATO) intervention in Libya was wrong. Our (NATO) invasion of Afghanistan was wrong. Our (NATO) invasion of Iraq was wrong. Each nation is now worse than it was before our 'God given right to invade and kick out of power those we dislike'. Terror groups like the taliban (read not ISIS) are reactionary. The Taliban were a reaction to the state the USSR invasion left afghanistan in. And now all we see is death here and there etc....
    (Original post by Docjones1)
    Strawman fallacy m8

    Name:  1343416724812.png
Views: 53
Size:  96.3 KB
    Interesting...
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jebedee)
    1. Non-Swede is not a race
    2. I am a non-Swede
    You know what I'm saying.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Longshot700)
    You know what I'm saying.

    Probably somewhere along the lines of "I have a poor grasp of English vocabulary, and I live in a lovely cottage in the countryside far away from the worries of immigration."
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jebedee)
    Probably somewhere along the lines of "I have a poor grasp of English vocabulary, and I live in a lovely cottage in the countryside far away from the worries of immigration."
    I live in croydon and my vocabulary and way of speaking is on point.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Longshot700)
    I live in croydon and my vocabulary and way of speaking is on point.
    Might want to look up the definition of racist then.
    Offline

    18
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    But what right do we have to tell others what and what not to do in THEIR OWN LANDS
    (Original post by SaeedIXVII)
    So we have a moral right to invade a nation because they did some bad?
    I would suggest that there's no resolution to this disagreement, because you clearly don't believe in the concept of universal human rights and think that co-existence with 'some bad' (the classic indicator of somebody who doesn't know what he's talking about in an argument about Iraq or Afghanistan) is not only possible, but desirable.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: February 4, 2016
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Break up or unrequited love?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.