This discussion is closed.
m:)ckel
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#21
Report 15 years ago
#21
(Original post by imasillynarb)
Can anyone show me what the graph of ln|3x-6| looks like?
this is how i drew it:
Attached files
0
infekt
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#22
Report 15 years ago
#22
(Original post by crana)
If you can imagine it this is how I drew it:

Asymptote at x = 2

line coming up from the asymptote on the right crossing the x axis at 7/3 (i think) then the curve slowed down but y continued to increase with x

then this was sort of reflected in the asymptote crossing x axis at 5/3 and y axis at ln 6

rosie
i got a dip at x=2

coz dy/dx = 3/(3x-6) = 0 hence x is 2

but i couldnt get a corresponding y value ... ill upload an image from my graphic calc

it was wierd in a way ...
0
infekt
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#23
Report 15 years ago
#23
(Original post by mockel)
this is how i drew it:
spot on my friend ... thts wat i did ... but i made the curve come very close to x=2 so tht it seemed tht they were joined
0
crana
Badges:
#24
Report 15 years ago
#24
(Original post by infekt)
i got a dip at x=2

coz dy/dx = 3/(3x-6) = 0 hence x is 2

but i couldnt get a corresponding y value ... ill upload an image from my graphic calc

it was wierd in a way ...
the only thing is that at x=2, y is undefined, so I don't think dy/dx is valid there if you see what I mean? Which is why you couldn't get a y value.

Im no great shakes at maths but if there is no "turning point" as such then the dy/dx = 0 could be that at x =2 the gradient *is* 0, because there is no graph there?

If that makes sense.

I dont have a graphics calculator but I am fairly sure that it is undefined ie asymptote at x=2
0
musicbloke
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#25
Report 15 years ago
#25
(Original post by crana)
(your way is nicer MB!)
Thanks,

MB
0
satin
Badges: 0
#26
Report 15 years ago
#26
(Original post by BossLady)
hey guys, was ques 5 the binomials right with [x^3-1/2x]^12? and then 6 was that iteration stuff (zzz) and 7 was that trap rule stuff?
you know for the iteration, how did u show it was 1.70 or whatever, did u just choose 1.65 and 1.75, stick it in and show sign change ya/?
Thats the right method for iteration, but because it said "correct to 2dp" I think you had to use 1.695 and 1.705, can anyone confirm?

For the "independent of x" term in the binomial question, it's possible without expanding the whole expression. Since the first term has postive index (x^3) and the second term has negative index (-0.5x^-1), you need to find the stage in the binomial expansion that makes both x terms have the same index number, and then they will cancel each other, leaving only a number and no x-term. So you need the term when (-0.5x^-1) is to the power of 9, and therefore (x^3) will be to power of 3. (Total powers must equal 12, because that is n.)

So you then get 12C9 . (x^3)^3 . (-0.5x^-1)^9
the x terms cancel out and you're left with a fraction which cancels down to
-55/128
0
crana
Badges:
#27
Report 15 years ago
#27
(Original post by satin)
Thats the right method for iteration, but because it said "correct to 2dp" I think you had to use 1.695 and 1.705, can anyone confirm?
That;s what I did (1.695 etc)
0
Adil Bhai
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#28
Report 15 years ago
#28
Thats the right method for iteration, but because it said "correct to 2dp" I think you had to use 1.695 and 1.705, can anyone confirm?

spot on dude!
0
crana
Badges:
#29
Report 15 years ago
#29
btw, what was the one for.. I think it was the iteration one and what value of x0 is this not valid for?

I think I put as it was something like root (blah blah /x+1) that it was when x=-1 so it is over 0 and hence undefinined..
0
m:)ckel
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#30
Report 15 years ago
#30
(Original post by infekt)
spot on my friend ... thts wat i did ... but i made the curve come very close to x=2 so tht it seemed tht they were joined
yeah i did that in the exam, but my mouse control isn't very good
0
miccol
Badges: 0
#31
Report 15 years ago
#31
hey ppl, u no wat sum1 jus told me?? dat last nyt a copy of da p2 edexcel got stolen+sum yoke put it online sumwer askin 4 help wif ans bt den da site ppl contacted edexcel! so wat y'all tink will happen?? :confused: c if we afta do it again.... :mad:
0
lexazver203
Badges: 0
#32
Report Thread starter 15 years ago
#32
could the graph go below the x axis??? i thought it would reflect in x=2 but i tohught that it wouldnt cross the axis
0
Barny
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#33
Report 15 years ago
#33
(Original post by mockel)
yeah i did that in the exam, but my mouse control isn't very good
What I mean is, anyone have some sort of graph sketching program and can like save the picture and post it for me?
0
crana
Badges:
#34
Report 15 years ago
#34
(Original post by lexazver203)
could the graph go below the x axis??? i thought it would reflect in x=2 but i tohught that it wouldnt cross the axis
Sure it can

for example: x = 2.01
y = ln |3x - 6| = ln (0.03) = -3.506..
0
crana
Badges:
#35
Report 15 years ago
#35
(Original post by imasillynarb)
What I mean is, anyone have some sort of graph sketching program and can like save the picture and post it for me?
Try
http://www.coolmath.com/graphit/

however it does seem to get a tad confused with modulus's, you can't really put them in.
0
JaF
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#36
Report 15 years ago
#36
(Original post by satin)
Thats the right method for iteration, but because it said "correct to 2dp" I think you had to use 1.695 and 1.705, can anyone confirm?
Yeah, thats what I did
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

If you do not get the A-level grades you want this summer, what is your likely next step?

Take autumn exams (125)
46.99%
Take exams next summer (37)
13.91%
Change uni choice through clearing (68)
25.56%
Apply to uni next year instead (24)
9.02%
I'm not applying to university (12)
4.51%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise