x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Integration by substitution question? watch

The question is this:
using x = u2 , find

I have got to this stage:

But don't know how to integrate this expression... (it doesn't appear to be a simple integration by recognition, i.e. natural log expression, and I haven't been taught how to integrate fractions otherwise)

I'm stuck!!! Any help is much appreciated!

2. Consider that 2u/(u-1) = 2(u-1)/(u-1) + 2/(u-1).
3. Have you tried dividing the numerator by the denominator.
4. (Original post by Funky_Giraffe)

The question is this:
using x = u2 , find

I have got to this stage:

But don't know how to integrate this expression... (it doesn't appear to be a simple integration by recognition, i.e. natural log expression, and I haven't been taught how to integrate fractions otherwise)

I'm stuck!!! Any help is much appreciated!

Looks better?
5. (Original post by Funky_Giraffe)

I have got to this stage:

But don't know how to integrate this expression... (it doesn't appear to be a simple integration by recognition, i.e. natural log expression, and I haven't been taught how to integrate fractions otherwise)
Use a second substitution
6. Split it up as much as you can. Take the numerator out after you've made your Substitutions!
7. (Original post by atsruser)
Use a second substitution
A second substitution just over complicates it (somewhat).
8. (Original post by B_9710)
A second substitution just over complicates it (somewhat).
You've haven't explained why you think so, but I beg to differ anyway.

1. All A level students will be familiar with substitutions, so no new technique is required, when you approach this problem via substitution. OTOH, few A level students will be taught the specific trick suggested, and fewer still would discover it on their own.

2. The amount of work in the two methods seems approximately identical to me, so I see no big win either way there.
9. (Original post by aymanzayedmannan)

Looks better?
Thanks all! Found this method the easiest to follow, so thank you

Just as a side point, if I need to find out √6, by binomial expansion of (1-4x)1/2 , wouldn't the best substitution for x be x = 0.1? Because I have a question here saying using the substitution x = 0.01 for this exact same bracket. I'm working through but getting an expression in terms of √0.96. I would have thought that 0.1 would give me in terms of √0.6 and from there it's easy because 0.6 and 6 are relatable.

Do you reckon this is a typo or is there actually a way by substituting x = 0.01?
10. (Original post by atsruser)
You've haven't explained why you think so, but I beg to differ anyway.

1. All A level students will be familiar with substitutions, so no new technique is required, when you approach this problem via substitution. OTOH, few A level students will be taught the specific trick suggested, and fewer still would discover it on their own.

2. The amount of work in the two methods seems approximately identical to me, so I see no big win either way there.
It does not make it harder I suppose but I always think it is better to integrate directly if you an rather than use a sub.
I wasn't saying what you said was wrong, I just myself wouldn't do it. But what do I know?
11. (Original post by Funky_Giraffe)
Thanks all! Found this method the easiest to follow, so thank you

Just as a side point, if I need to find out √6, by binomial expansion of (1-4x)1/2 , wouldn't the best substitution for x be x = 0.1? Because I have a question here saying using the substitution x = 0.01 for this exact same bracket. I'm working through but getting an expression in terms of √0.96. I would have thought that 0.1 would give me in terms of √0.6 and from there it's easy because 0.6 and 6 are relatable.

Do you reckon this is a typo or is there actually a way by substituting x = 0.01?
0.6 and 6 are only relatable in this context if you multiply by sqrt(10), which is a bit of a hard thing without a calculator.

Remember that: , and you can multiply by 5/2 much more easily.
12. (Original post by Funky_Giraffe)
Thanks all! Found this method the easiest to follow, so thank you
no worries - it was actually Zacken who taught me this trick so thank him
13. (Original post by Funky_Giraffe)
...
Don't thank me. Ayman deserves all the thanks, he explained it brilliantly.
14. (Original post by B_9710)
It does not make it harder I suppose but I always think it is better to integrate directly if you an rather than use a sub.
I wasn't saying what you said was wrong, I just myself wouldn't do it. But what do I know?
I agree. No need to substitute if you can split up the fraction.
15. (Original post by aymanzayedmannan)

Looks better?
Zacken, is that you?

Edit: just seen the post saying how zacken taught you it haha
16. (Original post by DylanJ42)
Zacken, is that you?
No, Zacken uses \displaystyle
17. (Original post by notnek)
No, Zacken uses \displaystyle
18. (Original post by Zacken)
19. (Original post by notnek)
I agree. No need to substitute if you can split up the fraction.
I can't see any significant benefit of one approach over the other, for someone who knows both.
20. (Original post by atsruser)
I can't see any significant benefit of one approach over the other, for someone who knows both.
There isn't really, just personal preference. I would prefer to manipulate the fraction than substitute.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: February 8, 2016
Today on TSR

### Happy St Patrick's day!

How are you celebrating?

### Stay at sixth form or go to college?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE