OK firstly whichever person wrote this article got it wrong. THe government/NHS claims that 99% of hospitals have single sex wards. This is very different from 99% of them having abolished mixed sex wards. You can have 1 out of 20 wards in your hospital single sex, and still claim you have single sex wards.
Ixzzy worked as a HCA, so can be excused for missing some key points.
She would have noticed that many wards these days are specialist. Whether 'surgical wards', respiratory wards, geriatric wards, orthopedic wards etc etc.
What is our priority? getting single sex wards, or putting people with similar conditions together so that the nurses/doctors looking after them can do so to a better degree. Nursing a person with COPD is a different skill to someone with a broken leg. quite distinctly so.
If people want single sex wards then they should be prerpared to see their local hospitals disappear and be swallowed up by massive hospitals dozens of miles away.
because think logically. if you havea ward with 20 beds - mixed hten at any point there is a bed a patient can be in it. if instead you have a single sex ward, then what if you have spare beds, but a run of male patients coming in rather than female? do you turn them away? cancel their surgeries?
hell no.
People also dont seem to grasp whata mixed ward is like. The old victorian wards of rows of beds are largely gone now (thank god), and are replaced by bays of about 4 beds per bay. each bay is in the vast vast majority of cases single sex. so a ward with 20 beds might have 4 bays - 2 male only, 2 female only, and then 4 single person side rooms (used either if there is someone of the wrong sex coming into the ward, or if there is someone with MRSA/C.diff)
I think the key thing the nhs/govt needs to do is improve nursing care, and simple things like having more toilets/bathing facilities on wards.