The Student Room Logo
This thread is closed

Disadvantages of being an Oxbridge student

Scroll to see replies

OK, I'm a Cambridge undergrad and this is what I dislike about the university:

-Collegiate status is good for making friends within college, but makes it harder to make friends at other colleges unless you actually try. Most of my friends at other colleges are, I have to admit, from TSR; some others are from various clubs and societies. Depending on the subject, it would be easy to have very few if any friends at other colleges.

-Stress. Yes, I am an historian, and yes we're stressed less than other subjects, but on the whole the culture of eight-week terms leads to a frantic pace of life and utter exhaustion. Everyone tries to fit in several different things, and a workload that would make people at other universities blanche. I have a friend at Warwick who wrote two essays a term for History; I wrote one a week. I spend about 15 hours a week plus on the river coxing, because it's very enjoyable- but it takes away a slice of my life.

-The Cambridge Bubble- unless you try, it's really hard to get to know what's happening in the world outside. In my first year especially I felt very cut off, but now make an effort to read the papers and watch the news to know what's going on. I also make an efforty occasionally to escape the bubble and go to other places, or I would go mad.

-Social things- people make a judgement of me and the kind of person I am if I tell them that I'm at Cambridge. As the first few pages stated from various people, we encounter reverse snobbery and just derision, or just feel terribly awkward- how do you reply to the question, "so you're really clever, then?" without seeming arrogant? I don't dislike being at this universtiy- in fact I'm proud- I just dislike people's reactions to it.

-Work- my degree is, basically, teaching me to blag and bull****. I'm given a week to read up to 20 different books and journal articles, and then expected to come up with something original. I'm expected to argue against and disprove professors who have spent their lives working on the topic after maybe 10 or 15 hours of reading (it should be 20, but never is). Essentially, my degree is teaching me to be arrogant and assertive, and I don't like it.

-Loneliness- yes, even surrounded by 20,000 other people, you can feel lonely. My degree is very solitary- even the other historians never do the same topic, so it's very lonely, with no-one to compare yourself to or anything.

-Inability to form normal social relationships- everything you do is compressed into a shorter period of time, and this includes relationships- I don't see my girlfriend as often as we both would like, and rarely if ever during the day, because of work and boring stuff like that.

-The essay grind- not necesserily so applicable for science students, but doing an essay a week every week really takes it out of you. You can rarely if ever be completly satisfied with your work, and there came a point last term when the last thing I wanted to do was to sit down and write another week's essay- but had to.

-Exams- yes, they're just as bad elsewhere I'm sure, but here the degrees are very traditional and not modular, so Finals count for a lot. Plus everyone is, basically, a geek or worse so there's a massive culture of panic and stress about exams. I'm quite stressed myself, though I've not shown it, to the point of being ill from stress.

-Elitism and "rah"-ism - unfortunately, it does exist. Yes it's never as blatent or offensive as I believed before I came up, but it does exist. People who've been to public school generally have an ineffable air of confidence and superiority about them, and are generally lucid and argumentative. Then there's just the odd people who get a termly cheque from Daddy, or a weekly allowance. It's going into Ede and Ravenscroft and being told that a suit, for me, is £600, and knowing that there's people who could easily afford it. Or people who have facebook albums of their holidays in Greece or wherever. Then there's just the occasional braying twit. Chip on my shoulder? Me? Never!
the_alba
You take my views with a pinch of salt? Hmm, that's a little harsh. I started this thread by saying that when people who don't go to Oxford find out that I do, they start saying my opinions are patronising and don't mean anything and that they take them with a pinch of salt. Now someone who is at Oxbridge is saying the same - because I'm a postgrad! I just can't win, can I? :rolleyes:

I don't tend to talk about my life as an undergrad at Oxford, because I wasn't one; but I am entitled to discuss my experience of Oxford on here - it's still a student's experience, and being a postgrad doesn't make my opinions about Oxford AS A UNIVERSITY any less valid. It is a research university, after all - there are a good few postgrads there, and does their experience of the place not count?


Sorry if I caused offence. I should have explained myself more clearly. What I meant is that any views you have about undergraduate studies (note: not Oxford in general) should be taken with a pinch of salt. I wrongly assumed you had been criticising Oxford at an undergraduate level, rather than as a university on the whole. So I completely disagree with people who say your opinions are invalid. Of course you are entitled to criticise Oxford, but from what Shady Lane had been saying about other peoples' comments, I assumed you had been criticising it for undergraduate studies. I hadn't read the original post for a while so didn't make the association between it and you. Sorry.
Reply 102
It's cool. I hadn't actually been criticising Oxford on this thread anyway - and certainly not the undergrad side - I tend to criticise my Master's on the postgrad forum!

I do still think 'pinch of salt' is a bit too strong a term if I wanted to talk about undergrad stuff though. Obviously I've never BEEN an undergrad at Oxford, but a lot of my friends have, and a very close friend of mine teaches, interviews and examines undergrads there too (he's a Fellow of St Anne's). So, talking to them and comparing my experiences with theirs, I think I'm entitled to give my views on these things, and I share a lot of these views with people who either were undergrads here or teach them. I wouldn't be talking from a position of authority, but what I said wouldn't automatically be so worthless as 'a pinch of salt'.

Otherwise it's like saying 'unless you've actually BEEN an oppressed Iranian woman you can't possibly have any opinions on the subject' (just for example!). Well, clearly in that example I couldn't explain first-hand how the burka was for me personally, but I could read about middle-eastern politics, Islamic culture and practice, and talk with women who had experienced that; and after such information-gathering I think my opinion would at least be worth more than 'a pinch of salt'. The same applies here.
FadetoBlackout
-Collegiate status is good for making friends within college, but makes it harder to make friends at other colleges unless you actually try. Most of my friends at other colleges are, I have to admit, from TSR; some others are from various clubs and societies. Depending on the subject, it would be easy to have very few if any friends at other colleges.


Everyone has to try to make friends in wider social circles. It's not something to dislike about Cambridge in particular.

-Stress. Yes, I am an historian, and yes we're stressed less than other subjects, but on the whole the culture of eight-week terms leads to a frantic pace of life and utter exhaustion. Everyone tries to fit in several different things, and a workload that would make people at other universities blanche. I have a friend at Warwick who wrote two essays a term for History; I wrote one a week. I spend about 15 hours a week plus on the river coxing, because it's very enjoyable- but it takes away a slice of my life.


The payoff will outweigh the stress. If it was that bad, you'd have left. Tbh, I don't think Oxbridge students should complain about it. That said, the workload is pretty pointless, so I take your points there. As you have said below in the "work" section, it doesn't make you any smarter.

The Cambridge Bubble- unless you try, it's really hard to get to know what's happening in the world outside. In my first year especially I felt very cut off, but now make an effort to read the papers and watch the news to know what's going on. I also make an efforty occasionally to escape the bubble and go to other places, or I would go mad.


This is probably a corollary of the workload. It's not just at Oxbridge though. It happens everywhere.That said I don't see the difficulty of turning the radio on in the morning from 6-9am.

-Social things- people make a judgement of me and the kind of person I am if I tell them that I'm at Cambridge. As the first few pages stated from various people, we encounter reverse snobbery and just derision, or just feel terribly awkward- how do you reply to the question, "so you're really clever, then?" without seeming arrogant? I don't dislike being at this universtiy- in fact I'm proud- I just dislike people's reactions to it.


I'm sorry but I view counter snobbery as nonsense. It reminds me of those people who say that white people are becoming oppressed in Britain. I think it's your perception. The kind of people I deal with don't give a rats ass about where I went to university. It's about me as a person.

-Work- my degree is, basically, teaching me to blag and bull****. I'm given a week to read up to 20 different books and journal articles, and then expected to come up with something original. I'm expected to argue against and disprove professors who have spent their lives working on the topic after maybe 10 or 15 hours of reading (it should be 20, but never is). Essentially, my degree is teaching me to be arrogant and assertive, and I don't like it.


I think Oxbridge students take the word "original" to mean re-inventing the wheel. You are not supposed to be mini-Niall Fergusons and rewrite history. Merely create a cogent argument with evidence of your own emphasis. It's not easy, but I think you may be putting too much pressure on yourself to produce a magnum opus every week.

-Loneliness- yes, even surrounded by 20,000 other people, you can feel lonely. My degree is very solitary- even the other historians never do the same topic, so it's very lonely, with no-one to compare yourself to or anything.


Come on man, are you a man or a mouse? Everyone has this, it's nothing to do with Cambrdige specifically.

-Inability to form normal social relationships- everything you do is compressed into a shorter period of time, and this includes relationships- I don't see my girlfriend as often as we both would like, and rarely if ever during the day, because of work and boring stuff like that.


Again, this is universal.

-The essay grind- not necesserily so applicable for science students, but doing an essay a week every week really takes it out of you. You can rarely if ever be completly satisfied with your work, and there came a point last term when the last thing I wanted to do was to sit down and write another week's essay- but had to


You applied for it, you never expected it to be easy. It's part and parcel of where you are.
Reply 104
^^ So you've basically unravelled all his dislikes about Cambridge and told us that we're not allowed to criticise Oxbridge, huh? Well, that was very helpful, thanks.
Pernell Whitaker
Everyone has to try to make friends in wider social circles. It's not something to dislike about Cambridge in particular.


It's different. You're in this college environment surrounded by the nebulous concept of "university". It really is easy not to make friends anywhere else if you don't try hard enough.

The payoff will outweigh the stress. If it was that bad, you'd have left. Tbh, I don't think Oxbridge students should complain about it. That said, the workload is pretty pointless, so I take your points there. As you have said below in the "work" section, it doesn't make you any smarter.


But even so, such stress still exists and, as we have on average more work, we have more stress. And there are many times when I've thought to myself, "why didn't I go to Durham/Warwick/Essex", generally at 4am when I'm just starting an essay due in for 8am the next day having not slept for the previous 48 hours! I still think that we're entitled to complain about it- everyone moans about work, ergo with more work we should be entitled to more moaning!

This is probably a corollary of the workload. It's not just at Oxbridge though. It happens everywhere.That said I don't see the difficulty of turning the radio on in the morning from 6-9am.


I do- I'm normally in the back of a boat coxing between 6 and 9am most mornings :p: Maybe it does happen everywhere, I wouldn't know having only experience of Cambridge. But that still means I can moan about it. Heck, maybe it's even more so than elsewhere as CUSU and other organisations, and current students, all realise the "bubble" exists and that it is a Bad Thing.

I'm sorry but I view counter snobbery as nonsense. It reminds me of those people who say that white people are becoming oppressed in Britain. I think it's your perception. The kind of people I deal with don't give a rats ass about where I went to university. It's about me as a person.


Perhaps I'm dealing with the wrong people, then. If I'm at home working on the checkout at Morrisons (as I did over Christmas in my first year) and someone asks me where I study, their reaction on hearing "Cambridge" made me want to lie. I can't really think of anyone I deal with, with the exception of those at Cambridge themselves, who don't care in some way. Basically, it's changed me and my friends from before- school, etc.- don't like the change.


I think Oxbridge students take the word "original" to mean re-inventing the wheel. You are not supposed to be mini-Niall Fergusons and rewrite history. Merely create a cogent argument with evidence of your own emphasis. It's not easy, but I think you may be putting too much pressure on yourself to produce a magnum opus every week.


If I was a real Niall Ferguson I'd have my opinions ripped apart fairly quickly- his name is pretty much mud around here! It is, however, hard to form a cogent argument of your own especially if every source seems convincing and well-argued and you see the merit of all the points under discussion! I also know for a fact that I can't produce a magnum opus each week- that was my Themes and Sources essay, hehe- and that I'm never happy with my weekly essays as I cannot ever put the full time they need to them.

Come on man, are you a man or a mouse? Everyone has this, it's nothing to do with Cambrdige specifically.


It is, however, to do with Cambridge History in particular. Other subjects such as ASNaC and Engineering are very intercollegiate and collegiate, respectively, and are probably at either end of the scale. I can't really go and do work with friends who do history because we've not studied the same papers, or if we have have very different interests within them. I can't go and work with friends in the same way that, say, engineers do.


Again, this is universal.


I disagree there. If Cambridge has more work- a comment which you do agree with- then logically there is less time for other things. My girlfriend is an engineer, and so has far less time and far more work than I have. She generally has 4 hours of lectures every morning and does 4 or 5 hours of work each afternoon, and sports and societies things in the evening. OK, if she were doing a different course then things would be different, but it's still something I dislike.


You applied for it, you never expected it to be easy. It's part and parcel of where you are.


No, I never did expect it to be easy- but that doesn't stop me from disliking something!

I think overall you've slightly misinterpreted my post. Several of these things are part and parcel of Cambridge, and some might well be universal. However, I never claimed that these were all things that are specific to Cambridge- though some are more than others- but they're all things that I dislike about the university. Yes, it is hard and there are times when I wish I could change, but overall I really do like it and it has given me development and oppertunities I doubt I would hve had elsewhere. It's just that there is a price attached.
FadeToBlackout
OK, I'm a Cambridge undergrad and this is what I dislike about the university:

-Collegiate status is good for making friends within college, but makes it harder to make friends at other colleges unless you actually try. Most of my friends at other colleges are, I have to admit, from TSR; some others are from various clubs and societies. Depending on the subject, it would be easy to have very few if any friends at other colleges.

-Stress. Yes, I am an historian, and yes we're stressed less than other subjects, but on the whole the culture of eight-week terms leads to a frantic pace of life and utter exhaustion. Everyone tries to fit in several different things, and a workload that would make people at other universities blanche. I have a friend at Warwick who wrote two essays a term for History; I wrote one a week. I spend about 15 hours a week plus on the river coxing, because it's very enjoyable- but it takes away a slice of my life.

-The Cambridge Bubble- unless you try, it's really hard to get to know what's happening in the world outside. In my first year especially I felt very cut off, but now make an effort to read the papers and watch the news to know what's going on. I also make an efforty occasionally to escape the bubble and go to other places, or I would go mad.

-Social things- people make a judgement of me and the kind of person I am if I tell them that I'm at Cambridge. As the first few pages stated from various people, we encounter reverse snobbery and just derision, or just feel terribly awkward- how do you reply to the question, "so you're really clever, then?" without seeming arrogant? I don't dislike being at this universtiy- in fact I'm proud- I just dislike people's reactions to it.

-Work- my degree is, basically, teaching me to blag and bull****. I'm given a week to read up to 20 different books and journal articles, and then expected to come up with something original. I'm expected to argue against and disprove professors who have spent their lives working on the topic after maybe 10 or 15 hours of reading (it should be 20, but never is). Essentially, my degree is teaching me to be arrogant and assertive, and I don't like it.

-Loneliness- yes, even surrounded by 20,000 other people, you can feel lonely. My degree is very solitary- even the other historians never do the same topic, so it's very lonely, with no-one to compare yourself to or anything.

-Inability to form normal social relationships- everything you do is compressed into a shorter period of time, and this includes relationships- I don't see my girlfriend as often as we both would like, and rarely if ever during the day, because of work and boring stuff like that.

-The essay grind- not necesserily so applicable for science students, but doing an essay a week every week really takes it out of you. You can rarely if ever be completly satisfied with your work, and there came a point last term when the last thing I wanted to do was to sit down and write another week's essay- but had to.

-Exams- yes, they're just as bad elsewhere I'm sure, but here the degrees are very traditional and not modular, so Finals count for a lot. Plus everyone is, basically, a geek or worse so there's a massive culture of panic and stress about exams. I'm quite stressed myself, though I've not shown it, to the point of being ill from stress.

-Elitism and "rah"-ism - unfortunately, it does exist. Yes it's never as blatent or offensive as I believed before I came up, but it does exist. People who've been to public school generally have an ineffable air of confidence and superiority about them, and are generally lucid and argumentative. Then there's just the odd people who get a termly cheque from Daddy, or a weekly allowance. It's going into Ede and Ravenscroft and being told that a suit, for me, is £600, and knowing that there's people who could easily afford it. Or people who have facebook albums of their holidays in Greece or wherever. Then there's just the occasional braying twit. Chip on my shoulder? Me? Never!


Exactly how I feel - good post FTB.
yep I agree. And even if some points are universal, whats the problem with that? It's still a negative point about Oxbridge and still valid.

Pernell I think you don't seem to understand some of James' points. Just because everyone gets lonely at times doesn't mean its any easier to deal with. If you're feeling lonely, combined with the constant stress of work pressure its easy to get you down, and you can't just afford to go out with mates and forget about it for a few days because the deadlines are on such a short timescale.

I have many further points to add but no doubt they would be claimed to be invalid also.
Reply 108
^^ Go on, add them. If there really were no disadvantages to being an Oxbridge student this whole thread would be invalid.
well I've just come back from a months ban so i haven't followed the whole topic, i will read through it first to make sure I don;t just repeat too much!
-x-Nina-x-


Pernell I think you don't seem to understand some of James' points. Just because everyone gets lonely at times doesn't mean its any easier to deal with. If you're feeling lonely, combined with the constant stress of work pressure its easy to get you down, and you can't just afford to go out with mates and forget about it for a few days because the deadlines are on such a short timescale.


Yeah that's cool.
Reply 111
I agree with the_alba, and even though I'm not actually at Cambridge I find that since having received an offer people are extremely prone to take offence at being supposedly 'patronised', and even my girlfriend (who didn't get in) keeps randomly accusing me of 'thinking I'm stupid' or 'thinking you're smarter than me' without saying anything explicit. But is it fair to count that as a disadvantage of the university itself? Anyways, sorry, I know I'm not really entitled to make comment here given the title, but my question was, since you are all aware of disadvantages, do any of you regret going? Do you wish you were somewhere else, or rather, do you feel the disadvantages outweigh the benefits?
Reply 112
^^ Of course you're entitled to comment - people's reaction to your offer is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. It's so annoying and there's no come back to it (I've never thought of a decent one anyway...).

As for regretting Oxbridge, I'm sure most people on here will say 'absolutely not' (though some people are very unhappy there). I can't talk about the undergrad side, but yes, in some ways I regret coming here - my course is uber-competitive to get onto, but once you're on you realise there is no substance to it and the only reason for all the competition is that it's Oxford. I think I could have done a better Master's if I'd gone somewhere else.

However, if I HAD gone somewhere else (which let's face it only would have happened if I'd been rejected from Ox), I would always have been wondering what it was like, and I'd still have quite an unrealistic idea of its intellectual greatness. So I would have applied to do a DPhil here, probably, and would have been regretting it for the next three years (it's not a good place for a DPhil in my subject).

And finally, whatever about the course etc, I am glad I came, because it does (so I'm told, wink-wink-nudge-nudge-style) count for something when applying to post-doctoral positions either in Oxbridge or in the States. And I have made some good friends here.
Pechorin
since you are all aware of disadvantages, do any of you regret going? Do you wish you were somewhere else, or rather, do you feel the disadvantages outweigh the benefits?


This is the most sensible question on this thread for days. Of course Oxbridge is not perfect. But the fact is moving to any university can be hard, and it's important to try to put things in context, regarding what's wrong with Oxbridge, or what's just part of being a student. I'll just have a work through some of the issues raised...

By Shady:

Study was too individual: Shady was unlucky here. She was a visting student studying an unusual course. Study is often communal - tute partners frequently discuss topics, share notes, and attend lectures together, as well as tutes of course. I also study a very unusual course and I've often been envious of how much communal work other students do. In tutorials, so long as you're not alone, you learn plenty from your partner. And there are seminars.

Essays were repetition of knowledge: This is wrong. Tutors never stop telling you not to repeat knowledge, and if you do it in an exam you'll be penalised massively. In fact, compared to other UK universities, Oxbridge is a million times better in this regard.

Students were unfriendly and cold: again, Shady was unrepresentative. Part of a big exchange programme where like 30 Stanford students come en masse and have their own house. So they're least likely to make friends. DESPITE this, I know loads of Stanford students who have made friends with Oxford students, got involved in rowing crews, started relationships etc

Colonial apologism: pretty unique to Shady and her unusual course. Wouldn't surprise me if true but I can't say.

lack of diversity: I agree with this. It's not really Oxford's fault, but if you're from an unusual background, I can entirely see how you might be frustrated that Oxford is so predominantly middle class and white. I think in this respect Oxbridge is a little worse than other top British universities

Lack of progressive attitude: I agree with this too - I think the students here are a bit conservative. However, there is a very progressive and active minority. Oxford is on green energy, for example, due to a student campaign. Again, I think this is an area where Oxford is a little weaker.

By FtB

Collegiate status and making friends: I think Oxbridge is better here. Friends at other uni still make friends based on Halls of Residence first and then people doing their subject, or in the same club and societies. At Oxford, you just have a bigger, more friendly Hall of Residence.

Stress: Oxbridge definitely worse than other universities here.

The Bubble: this is true, but I don't think it's a valid point. There's a people because peopel are so involved in uni life. If you don't read the paper, that's your fault, it's not like you don't have time or it's not online. And transport links are excellent, it's easy to travel around, and if you don't again that's mainly your fault.

Reverse snobbery: rarely encoutered it - and hardly Oxbridge's fault.

Work teaching you to be too argumentative (note this is the opposite of what Shady said, by the way!): It's mad to say this is bad. Teaching you to be able to understand issues and make an argument is great. If you're an arrogant ******, only then is it a problem. But the two are seperate issues. I've met four genuinely exceptional students at Oxford. One was a dick, but that was nothing to do with Oxford. The other three are humble and only too willing to help out when they can.

Loneliness: a serious issue, but I think worse at other universities, where you don't have the collegiate environment to support you.

Inability to form normal social relationships: this isn't true. I've personally known six couples who got engaged while at Oxford, and about a zillion others in long term relationships. I suppose it is fair to say that you need to manage your time, though.

The essay grind: again, true that there's lots of work. But you probably guessed that one...

Exams: This is a fair point for a lot (though not all) subjects. Some people prefer coursework and some Oxbridge degrees are too focussed on Final exams.

-Elitism and "rah"-ism: some people are rich, some people are ******s. But that's life. I don't think Oxbridge has more than its share of ******s. As for not being able to stand other people have money, I would say that's less their issue than yours (unless their ******s about it, but see above for that!)

Hmm well I rowed with Magdalen for about a month (had to stop b/c I had a class trip to Germany during Summer Eights!), and the girls were NEVER friendly. I used to try really hard to talk to them as well; they would always walk away after the gym/erg sessions in a group and leave the Americans behind. My friend played on the basketball team and I met some people through him. Overall though, the people who tended to talk to me were either other visiting students or postgrads.

Yes, there were Stanford girls who dated while at Oxford, but I don't think I should be unable to get into the social scene simply because I didn't see very many fit guys while I was there!
Reply 115
shady lane
Hmm well I rowed with Magdalen for about a month (had to stop b/c I had a class trip to Germany during Summer Eights!), and the girls were NEVER friendly. I used to try really hard to talk to them as well; they would always walk away after the gym/erg sessions in a group and leave the Americans behind. My friend played on the basketball team and I met some people through him. Overall though, the people who tended to talk to me were either other visiting students or postgrads.
Rowers can sometimes be like that, I'm afraid, particularly in the very serious crews. I don't see why would they exclude you specifically, though - it's rather jumping to conclusions to say that it's because you're American.

shady lane
Yes, there were Stanford girls who dated while at Oxford, but I don't think I should be unable to get into the social scene simply because I didn't see very many fit guys while I was there!
There are plenty of fit people in Oxford, but they're nearly all in relationships. Relationship-whores. :mad:

Hmm well there was one serious fit guy in Magdalen, he was called Felix! WOW so hot!
Reply 117
Isaiah Berlin
Collegiate status and making friends: I think Oxbridge is better here. Friends at other uni still make friends based on Halls of Residence first and then people doing their subject, or in the same club and societies. At Oxford, you just have a bigger, more friendly Hall of Residence.

See, I view this completely differently. At other unis, as you said, you have friends based in res, and in classes you have, and in clubs etc. At Oxford, for arts subjects anway, THESE ARE ALL THE SAME PEOPLE. You get to know the people in college great, but trying to meet anyone on the same course as you from another college in, say, lectures is damn near impossible. Unless you stalk them. And that's just silly.

I feel people here are just too reliant on their college - I love my friends in college. They are great. But I would love to have more of a 'supporting cast' of people in my life, who DON'T live with me. Even house parties are just more people from college. I feel like I go to a university of 400, not 18 000.

And whilst I know there are university-wide clubs etc, it really shouldn't be neccessary to *have* to join them to meet people who don't live in the same building as you. Even people I know in these clubs only seem to know a handful of people from outside college.
Mayfly
See, I view this completely differently. At other unis, as you said, you have friends based in res, and in classes you have, and in clubs etc. At Oxford, for arts subjects anway, THESE ARE ALL THE SAME PEOPLE. You get to know the people in college great, but trying to meet anyone on the same course as you from another college in, say, lectures is damn near impossible. Unless you stalk them. And that's just silly.

Depends on the size of your subject, I do CAAH which is obviously an arts subject and there's only about 18 of us in my year so we all know each other, as classes are intercollegiate.
FadeToBlackout
Stress. Yes, I am an historian, and yes we're stressed less than other subjects, but on the whole the culture of eight-week terms leads to a frantic pace of life and utter exhaustion. Everyone tries to fit in several different things, and a workload that would make people at other universities blanche. I have a friend at Warwick who wrote two essays a term for History; I wrote one a week.


2 essays a term (Warwick) :eek: That's ridiculous!