Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

B931 - Photographic Image and Modelling Bill 2016 (Second Reading) watch

    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    B931 - Photographic Image and Modelling Bill 2016 (Second Reading), TSR Green Party
    Photographic Image and Modelling Bill 2016, Second Reading

    A bill to combat mental health issues amongst young people specifically relating to self-image


    BE IT ENACTED by The Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in accordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-


    1. Definitions:

    A.‘Excessively underweight’ for the purposes of this Bill shall be defined as having a BMI of under 16, or a BMI of over 16 and under 17.5 where the person does not have a recent (less than 30 days prior) certification from a doctor to confirm that they are healthy.
    B. A ‘minor’ for the purposes of this Bill shall be defined as a person of age 14 years or below.
    C A 'Model' is s person employed or paid a fee for appearing in a public place or at a venue for specifically wearing clothes by a person or company, who may be expected to walk or otherwise display the clothes.

    2. Underweight Models

    A. From the date of introduction it will be illegal for modelling agencies to hire excessively underweight models.
    B. It will now be compulsory for agencies to carry out BMI checks on all of their models.
    C. Any agency found to have hired an excessively underweight model will be liable to pay a fine of up to £90,000 per excessively underweight model with the proceeds of these fines to be paid to fund existing NHS support for people suffering from eating disorders.
    D. Agencies will have 9 months from the implementation of this Bill to ensure that all of their current models comply with these new regulations before facing the previously mentioned £90,000 fine.
    E. Failure to pay this fine will result in the offending organisation’s manager being liable for a minimum of 1 month and a maximum of 6 months imprisonment.
    F. This section of the Bill shall take effect from May 1st 2016 giving fashion houses enough time to prepare for London fashion week in September.

    3. Publications targeted at minors.

    A. It shall now be compulsory for all magazines/publications to provide the government with information on their reader’s age demographic.
    B. And publication found to have a demographic of 30% or more minors will be to ensure that no images are digitally altered to cut out any blemishes in a models skin or to make their body shape appear altered. Publishers should be ready to provide original pictures in order to prove that these rules are being followed.
    C. Any failure to prove that the photographs are not enhanced in the aforementioned ways will result in a fine of up to £500,000 and the pulling out of circulation of this publication until this fine has been paid. Repeat offenders (where the rules have been broken on more than 3 occasions in 6 months) shall have their publications banned for a period of 6 months.
    D. It will now also be compulsory for all publications/magazines that are able to clearly demonstrate that their demographic is not 30% or more minors to clearly label all photographs that have been digitally altered as section 3b refers to. Failure to do this will result in the same sanctions as mentioned in 3C.

    4. Title and Implementation of the Bill

    A. This Bill shall be known as the Photographic Image and Modelling Bill 2016
    B. This Bill will take effect for all organisations that operate in the United Kingdom.
    C. This Bill will take effect from the date of Royal Assent of the Bill but the sanctions and punishments will not come into effect until 1st May 2016.


    Notes: The purpose of this bill is to combat the unprecedented rises in mental health problems (‘http://www.anorexiabulimiacare.org.uk’ has stated that around 8% of all women suffer from bulimia in their life time). France has already implemented a similar law which has received widespread support, one article in favour;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ainsle...b_7020356.html . This is an interesting stat found below the Huffington Post article; according to ‘Prevention of Eating Problems with Elementary Children, Michael Levine, USA Today, July 1998.’ -http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slides...82623_free.jpg

    Changes from First Reading
    Unacceptably low BMI has been redefined, such that models with BMI under 17.5 require a recent (less than 30 days prior) certification from a doctor to confirm that they are healthy, and any BMI under 16 has a blanket ban regardless of doctor's note or not.

    Punishments section refers to imprisonment, not Her Majesty's pleasure,so the Bill would still apply in the event of the UK becoming a republic.
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    Still a nay, doubly so given the notes for the changes

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    No.
    • Very Important Poster
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    Study Helper
    Nope, soz!

    In other news, praise the lord that coffee is so good for you!
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Nay

    :woo:
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Aye. It's a pity that the changes suggested in first reading haven't all been made, but still an improvement over the status quo.
    • Study Helper
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Study Helper
    Welcome Squad
    Aye

    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Aye. It's a pity that the changes suggested in first reading haven't all been made, but still an improvement over the status quo.
    Remind me which ones we missed?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Still no, sorry.

    Actually, I'm offended there's no mention of obese people. The ‘fat acceptance’ movement is at least as bad as the good old anorexia nervosa. Plus size models? LOL!
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andy98)
    Remind me which ones we missed?
    Life_peer's suggestion of a combined index replacing BMI in particular.
    • Study Helper
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Study Helper
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Life_peer's suggestion of a combined index replacing BMI in particular.
    Right, well that's purely because in the research we found no such thing - he mentioned it in the thread but we simply couldn't find any mention of it elsewhere in the internet.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    No
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andy98)
    Right, well that's purely because in the research we found no such thing - he mentioned it in the thread but we simply couldn't find any mention of it elsewhere in the internet.
    I interpreted it as you design the index from the given components.
    • Study Helper
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Study Helper
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    I interpreted it as you design the index from the given components.
    Ahhhh right, well we don't want to do the doctor's job...

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Nay, sympathy for the idea but bmi
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    Still Nay
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Nay
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Formatting!

    But Nay although LP makes a good point too.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    Aye. I am still in favour of this bill. It is simply tragic that so many people are affected by eating disorders and something needs to be done. I believe that there should be more restrictions on advertisments and better awareness about such conditions.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Life_peer's suggestion of a combined index replacing BMI in particular.
    I thought he suggested replacing BMI with a more accurate, percentage of body fat index.
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: March 3, 2016
Poll
Do you like carrot cake?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.