Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    section b answers anyone, what page?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    If I did 1/2CV-1/2CV that's fine too right?
    I should think so. Although it depends on your value of capacitance in part (a) I guess.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by liverpool2044)
    section b answers anyone, what page?
    I wanna say page 70..maybe
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    If I did 1/2CV-1/2CV that's fine too right?
    That does sound right, but I think the question is to whether the trapezium should have its rectangle downwards or across..?

    edit:Or perhaps a better question would be which was on the x and which on the y axis aha!?
    double edit: Does it matter?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by A Slice of Pi)
    I should think so. Although it depends on your value of capacitance in part (a) I guess.
    Oh crap I meant 1/2QV-1/2QV off the graph
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by allofthestars)
    would dropping 20 marks give me an A?
    Most probably.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cowie)
    That does sound right, but I think the question is to whether the trapezium should have its rectangle downwards or across..?
    I did the trapezium also and got a value 0.03 (can't remember what 10^x was) different to 1/2QV-1/2QV thing I did
    It was trapezium though, not triangle
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Oh crap I meant 1/2QV-1/2QV off the graph
    I don't see why that shouldn't also be right...
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by A Slice of Pi)
    I don't see why that shouldn't also be right...
    Yeah, it interestingly gave a value ever so slightly different to area of trapezium I did however
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Only re-judgement. Would 56-58 be a definite A?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Yeah, it interestingly gave a value ever so slightly different to area of trapezium I did however
    I tried something similar to check and it did! But they'll have a range of acceptable values because they'll have anticipated that students will have different methods so don't worry.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Did the gradient to find out the capacitance (first question) say 'state your answer to an appropriate number of significant figures' or something?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    I did the trapezium also and got a value 0.03 (can't remember what 10^x was) different to 1/2QV-1/2QV thing I did
    It was trapezium though, not triangle
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1466455464.037311.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  64.7 KB
    Green trapezium or red trapezium? (Q/V may be wrong way round)


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cowie)
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1466455464.037311.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  64.7 KB
    Green trapezium or red trapezium? (Q/V may be wrong way round)


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Red
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Red
    good to hear, thanks!
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nikhilm)
    Did the gradient to find out the capacitance (first question) say 'state your answer to an appropriate number of significant figures' or something?
    No sf mark iirc was in gravitational field question
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Yeah, it interestingly gave a value ever so slightly different to area of trapezium I did however
    I did counting the squares... Face palm. Not sure if this will get any credit but I got an answer similiar to what most a citing on here
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    No sf mark iirc was in gravitational field question
    Ah man, do you think gradient = 8.4 for the first question would be in the range?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nikhilm)
    Ah man, do you think gradient = 8.4 for the first question would be in the range?
    Idk I got 8.0 which is quite off too, so let's hope it's 8.2+-0.2. I took the end points of the line which weren't exactly on the grid intersection you know
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by A Slice of Pi)
    I should think so. Although it depends on your value of capacitance in part (a) I guess.
    For part a(I) the capacitance was the gradient of the graph right?

    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.