Hahahahahaha.(Original post by kingaaran)
Interesting that a bored Oxford undergrad knows what the question says (despite it being unpublished) and has just made his account today a few minutes after I posted.
I'm sorry, but you're fundamentally wrong.
*
As for your making of the second account and attempt to pull straws, here's a full explanation for you:
As far as I remember, the question said that one particle recoiled at a speed V (let's call this particle A) and the other was emitted with speed v (let's call this particle B).
Now, momentum involves velocity, which is a vector quantity. Thus, when considering this 'conservation of momentum', we need to pick a direction that is consistent. I am going to pick the direction of particle B to be the positive direction. It hence follows that:
=> Momentum of particle A = (its mass)*(V) *
=> Momentum of particle B = (its mass)*v
That is consistent with the directions.
Applying the conservation of momentum: momentum before = momentum after
hence: 0 = mass*(V) + mass*v
In this context that translates at mvNV=0 => mv = NV.
Even in the later part of the question on your unofficial mark scheme you use the positive version.
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment.
Hence, while your result is of the correct magnitude, its sign is incorrect and, due to AQA's precise definition of the speed of the recoiling nucleus, I doubt they'd appreciate your assumption that the direction of motion of the two decay fragments is the same.
First of all, I'm actually a friend of Jay1421. He asked me to have a look at the question after your (and others') comments. I'm an undergraduate at Brasenose College, and I'm in the 94th percentile of my year. I'm not a user of TSR but I felt this topic is one that often causes confusion, so I thought I'd try to offer an explanation. As wonderfully indepth as your explanation is, you misread the question. It stated that and are velocities. See my earlier post. Also, since you're going on to do a mathsbased degree, I suggest you learn how to use LaTeX.
You are Here:
Home
> Forums
>< Study Help
>< Maths, science and technology academic help
>< Physics
>< Physics Exams

AQA Physics PHYA4  20th June 2016 [Exam Discussion Thread] watch

 Follow
 2141
 08072016 20:48

 Follow
 2142
 08072016 20:51
(Original post by kingaaran)
Interesting that a bored Oxford undergrad knows what the question says (despite it being unpublished) and has just made his account today a few minutes after I posted.
I'm sorry, but you're fundamentally wrong.
*
As for your making of the second account and attempt to pull straws, here's a full explanation for you:
As far as I remember, the question said that one particle recoiled at a speed V (let's call this particle A) and the other was emitted with speed v (let's call this particle B).
Now, momentum involves velocity, which is a vector quantity. Thus, when considering this 'conservation of momentum', we need to pick a direction that is consistent. I am going to pick the direction of particle B to be the positive direction. It hence follows that:
=> Momentum of particle A = (its mass)*(V) *
=> Momentum of particle B = (its mass)*v
That is consistent with the directions.
Applying the conservation of momentum: momentum before = momentum after
hence: 0 = mass*(V) + mass*v
In this context that translates at mvNV=0 => mv = NV.
Even in the later part of the question on your unofficial mark scheme you use the positive version.
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment.
Hence, while your result is of the correct magnitude, its sign is incorrect and, due to AQA's precise definition of the speed of the recoiling nucleus, I doubt they'd appreciate your assumption that the direction of motion of the two decay fragments is the same.
The fact that your reaction to being told you're wrong is to make false accusations based on arbitrary evidence says a lot about you. 
crashMATHS
 Follow
 157 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to crashMATHS
 Visit crashMATHS's homepage!
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 2143
 08072016 20:52
(Original post by tomg0166)
Hahahahahaha.
First of all, I'm actually a friend of Jay1421. He asked me to have a look at the question after your (and others') comments. I'm an undergraduate at Brasenose College, and I'm in the 94th percentile of my year. I'm not a user of TSR but I felt this topic is one that often causes confusion, so I thought I'd try to offer an explanation. As wonderfully indepth as your explanation is, you misread the question. It stated that and are velocities. See my earlier post. Also, since you're going on to do a mathsbased degree, I suggest you learn how to use LaTeX.
And I can use LaTex perfectly, just couldn't be asked here* 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2144
 08072016 21:12
V and v are both velocities, so there was no need to add signs to them when calculating total momentum before and after  since velocity gives direction and magnitude already. therefore i'm fairly sure the final answer has a '' sign.
now, had the question said V is a speed in one direction and v is the speed in the opposite direction, then you would have to say that Vm  vN = 0 (since in the diagram, they are pointing in opposite directions to indicate the direction of the scalar values). but the question said velocity, so there was no need. 
thatguycalledjoe
 Follow
 0 followers
 1 badge
 Send a private message to thatguycalledjoe
Offline1ReputationRep: Follow
 2145
 08072016 21:13
Its just notation  you can write the minus explicitly or you can leave it implicit. I suspect you'd get credit for both answers

 Follow
 2146
 08072016 21:13
(Original post by kingaaran)
Indeed they are  they are velocities*in the opposite direction
And I can use LaTex perfectly, just couldn't be asked here*
Define .
This is analogous to the momenta given in the question. (Which are indeed vectors)
Then
You don't need to add any minus signs in to show that and are opposite. They are defined as so.
AQA should have properly stated that and were vectors, but they are implicitly defined as so by calling them velocities (which are never scalar). 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2147
 08072016 21:17
(Original post by kingaaran)
Interesting that a bored Oxford undergrad knows what the question says (despite it being unpublished) and has just made his account today a few minutes after I posted.
I'm sorry, but you're fundamentally wrong.
*
As for your making of the second account and attempt to pull straws, here's a full explanation for you:
As far as I remember, the question said that one particle recoiled at a speed V (let's call this particle A) and the other was emitted with speed v (let's call this particle B).
Now, momentum involves velocity, which is a vector quantity. Thus, when considering this 'conservation of momentum', we need to pick a direction that is consistent. I am going to pick the direction of particle B to be the positive direction. It hence follows that:
=> Momentum of particle A = (its mass)*(V) *
=> Momentum of particle B = (its mass)*v
That is consistent with the directions.
Applying the conservation of momentum: momentum before = momentum after
hence: 0 = mass*(V) + mass*v
In this context that translates at mvNV=0 => mv = NV.
Even in the later part of the question on your unofficial mark scheme you use the positive version.
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment.
Hence, while your result is of the correct magnitude, its sign is incorrect and, due to AQA's precise definition of the speed of the recoiling nucleus, I doubt they'd appreciate your assumption that the direction of motion of the two decay fragments is the same. 
 Follow
 2148
 08072016 21:23
(Original post by kingaaran)
Interesting that a bored Oxford undergrad knows what the question says (despite it being unpublished) and has just made his account today a few minutes after I posted.
I'm sorry, but you're fundamentally wrong.
*
As for your making of the second account and attempt to pull straws, here's a full explanation for you:
As far as I remember, the question said that one particle recoiled at a speed V (let's call this particle A) and the other was emitted with speed v (let's call this particle B).
Now, momentum involves velocity, which is a vector quantity. Thus, when considering this 'conservation of momentum', we need to pick a direction that is consistent. I am going to pick the direction of particle B to be the positive direction. It hence follows that:
=> Momentum of particle A = (its mass)*(V) *
=> Momentum of particle B = (its mass)*v
That is consistent with the directions.
Applying the conservation of momentum: momentum before = momentum after
hence: 0 = mass*(V) + mass*v
In this context that translates at mvNV=0 => mv = NV.
Even in the later part of the question on your unofficial mark scheme you use the positive version.
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment.
Hence, while your result is of the correct magnitude, its sign is incorrect and, due to AQA's precise definition of the speed of the recoiling nucleus, I doubt they'd appreciate your assumption that the direction of motion of the two decay fragments is the same.
Momentum of a = M(a)V(a)
Momentum of b = M(b)V(b)
Total momentum = M(a)V(a) + M(b)V(b)
As I said, with velocity being a vector quantity, it already has it's direction in the quantity  putting a minus there is incorrect.
Hopefully, the topic of momenta never comes up on crashMATHS. 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2149
 08072016 21:45
(Original post by kingaaran)
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment. 
 Follow
 2150
 08072016 23:59
(Original post by kingaaran)
Interesting that a bored Oxford undergrad knows what the question says (despite it being unpublished) and has just made his account today a few minutes after I posted.
I'm sorry, but you're fundamentally wrong.
*
As for your making of the second account and attempt to pull straws, here's a full explanation for you:
As far as I remember, the question said that one particle recoiled at a speed V (let's call this particle A) and the other was emitted with speed v (let's call this particle B).
Now, momentum involves velocity, which is a vector quantity. Thus, when considering this 'conservation of momentum', we need to pick a direction that is consistent. I am going to pick the direction of particle B to be the positive direction. It hence follows that:
=> Momentum of particle A = (its mass)*(V) *
=> Momentum of particle B = (its mass)*v
That is consistent with the directions.
Applying the conservation of momentum: momentum before = momentum after
hence: 0 = mass*(V) + mass*v
In this context that translates at mvNV=0 => mv = NV.
Even in the later part of the question on your unofficial mark scheme you use the positive version.
If that still hasn't convinced you, let's suppose we have a stationary particle of mass 5 kg that explodes into two smaller fragment, one of mass 2 kg and the other of mass 3kg. The fragment with mass 2kg moves with speed 2 ms^(1) and the fragment with mass 3kg moves with speed v ms^(1) in the opposite direction. Find v.
Conservation of momentum tells us that: 0 = 2(2) + 3(v) => v = 4/3 ms^(1)
*
Your method: 0 = 2(2)+3v => v = 4/3 ms^(1). This comes out as negative because we have taken v to be in the wrong direction, assuming that it moves in the same direction as the other fragment.
Hence, while your result is of the correct magnitude, its sign is incorrect and, due to AQA's precise definition of the speed of the recoiling nucleus, I doubt they'd appreciate your assumption that the direction of motion of the two decay fragments is the same.
The derivation is exactly the same regardless of if you use the positive or negative 'version' of the V =(±vm)/N equation. 
 Follow
 2151
 09072016 13:12
Jay1421 hey thanks for the unofficial mark scheme. Do you remember how many marks 4c was worth?

 Follow
 2152
 10072016 11:18
kingaaran hey, you posted answers to the multiple choice answers a few weeks ago, do you have a link, or remember the page number, I cant remember which it was on. Thanks

crashMATHS
 Follow
 157 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to crashMATHS
 Visit crashMATHS's homepage!
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 2153
 10072016 11:48
(Original post by boyyo)
kingaaran hey, you posted answers to the multiple choice answers a few weeks ago, do you have a link, or remember the page number, I cant remember which it was on. Thanks 
 Follow
 2154
 10072016 12:06
(Original post by boyyo)
Jay1421 hey thanks for the unofficial mark scheme. Do you remember how many marks 4c was worth? 
 Follow
 2155
 10072016 12:17
(Original post by Jay1421)
Hi, sorry  4c was worth 3 marks 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2156
 12072016 19:19
I know this is random and people won't want to be thinking about this in the middle of their summer, but what do you think the grade boundaries for the EMPA will be? It was relatively straightforward, right? Do people think they're going to be the highest they've ever been?

Euclidean
 Follow
 21 followers
 8 badges
 Send a private message to Euclidean
 Thread Starter
Offline8ReputationRep: Follow
 2157
 12072016 19:55
(Original post by tomg0166)
The problem with this question is that vectors are not treated properly in A Level physics, which seemingly creates an ambiguity. The magnitudes of the momenta will be equal, but and are not magnitudes; they're proper (if poorly notated) vector quantities. Hence and cannot be equal, since they are vectors pointing in opposite directions. I remember being confused about this when I was doing A Level physics; it's mostly down to the watered down mathematical treatments of the course, leading to a fuzzy mixing of 'vector' and 'magnitude of a vector'.(Original post by tanyapotter)
you can't make this comparison though, because in your example you take 2ms^1 and vms^1 to be speeds, and in the exam they were given as velocities.
The diagram shows the direction of the final velocities of the two objects and their magnitudes, not their velocities.
V in the case of this question denotes the magnitude of the velocity of the particle in question after the collision and not the velocity of the particle. This is very clear from the provided diagram, by the fact that they labelled the speed of the particle V and not V.
In any case, I strongly suspect AQA will accept either sign given the level of confusion here and the answer to this question has no bearing on the following parts.
Edit: It's also neither necessary or indicative of intelligence to throw insults at people who have opposing opinions to you:Spoiler:Show(Original post by Jay1421)
Hopefully, the topic of momenta never comes up on crashMATHS.Last edited by Euclidean; 12072016 at 19:58. 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2158
 12072016 20:00
(Original post by Euclidean)
I don't agree with this, particularly the assumptions that v and V are not magnitudes.
The diagram shows the direction of the final velocities of the two objects and their magnitudes, not their velocities.
V in the case of this question denotes the magnitude of the velocity of the particle in question after the collision and not the velocity of the particle. This is very clear from the provided diagram, by the fact that they labelled the speed of the particle V and not V.
In any case, I strongly suspect AQA will accept either sign given the level of confusion here and the answer to this question has no bearing on the following parts.
I would have thought that if that were the case, the question would very clearly have stated that V is the speed. Because speed is just a magnitude. You may be right that they'd allow either?
By the way, have you done the EMPA? Would you happen to have any grade boundary predictions for it? 
Euclidean
 Follow
 21 followers
 8 badges
 Send a private message to Euclidean
 Thread Starter
Offline8ReputationRep: Follow
 2159
 12072016 20:05
(Original post by tanyapotter)
So you're saying V is the magnitude, the arrow is the direction, and altogether it forms the velocity, which is what the question is referring to?
I would have thought that if that were the case, the question would very clearly have stated that V is the speed. Because speed is just a magnitude. You may be right that they'd allow either?
By the way, have you done the EMPA? Would you happen to have any grade boundary predictions for it?
Hence
But I also strongly think AQA will have to accept either answer simply because they didn't make their intention clear enough.
Sorry I didn't sit the EMPA, may be worth checking past grade boundaries, looking for the grade/UMS mark you want and calculating a mean raw mark for that UMS mark. 
tanyapotter
 Follow
 50 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tanyapotter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 2160
 12072016 20:11
(Original post by Euclidean)
I'd say that because of the way they presented the diagram, V is infact the magnitude of the velocity of whatever that particle was (memory is failing me) and that this, coupled with the direction makes up the velocity of V.
Hence
But I also strongly think AQA will have to accept either answer simply because they didn't make their intention clear enough.
Sorry I didn't sit the EMPA, may be worth checking past grade boundaries, looking for the grade/UMS mark you want and calculating a mean raw mark for that UMS mark.
And no worries.
Related discussions
 2016 ALevel Exam Threads Directory!
 AQA Physics PHYA4  Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam ...
 The Official Cambridge Applicants Thread 2016 Entry MK II
 The Official Cambridge Offer Holders Thread 2016 Entry MK II
 AQA A levels incorrect results
 Official AS & A2 Results Day 2016
 2015 AS/A2 Results Day (Thursday 13th August)  Official ...
 AS/A2 Results Day, Thursday 13th August 2015  Official ...
 Current Year 13 thread Mark I (20142015)
 Struggling with revision? Join the TSR session every hour!! ...
Related university courses

Physics
Queen Mary University of London

Physics
University of Strathclyde

Physics with Astrophysics
Northumbria University

Mathematics and Physics
University of Lincoln

Physics
Durham University

Physics (with an industrial placement year)
University of Sussex

Physics with Astronomy (MSci) (4 years)
University of Nottingham

Physics with Astrophysics (with a year abroad)
University of York

Physics with Computer Science (3 years)
University of Sheffield

Theoretical Physics
Durham University
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 rayquaza17
 Notnek
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel