Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

AQA Physics PHYA4 - 20th June 2016 [Exam Discussion Thread] watch

    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    https://gyazo.com/1c1f8ff97e2d2369eea920c54ab0a3fa

    That's my solution to the momentum proof question for the people who struggled with it
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jay1421)
    I still can't tell if my momentum one was right, I got around 1 * 10^-19... which didn't seem right.

    For the advantage I put that it would be faster because electricity is faster than friction (I don't even know) and then for the disadvantage, I put that to stop a car you'd require a strong electromagnet so that would result in a higher energy use, i.e less efficient? :\

    Best of luck!
    I got that for momentum too.... Good luck though!
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by particlestudent)
    I got -3Q/8 for electric potential, probably wrong
    And zero for that square one
    I got those.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yo12345)
    Who got +5Q/8 for electric potetial, -4GM/d for gravitaional potential? Work done by 2nC charge as 0.15microC? The one with the charge moving along the electric field line that potential is constant? The one with the electric field strength at the centre of the square = 0? The pendulum one with the biggest amplitude = A? The one with Capacitance decreasing: 96V and 2.9x10^-10 charge?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    EoG = no unit


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yo12345)
    Who got +5Q/8 for electric potetial, -4GM/d for gravitaional potential? Work done by 2nC charge as 0.15microC? The one with the charge moving along the electric field line that potential is constant? The one with the electric field strength at the centre of the square = 0? The pendulum one with the biggest amplitude = A? The one with Capacitance decreasing: 96V and 2.9x10^-10 charge?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    The pendulum one was B because it was the same length therefore the frequency was the same so undergoes resonance.

    The charge moving along the field line wasn't constant, It was either increasing or decreasing but I can't remember which.

    the capacitance one is definitely correct and I can't remember the others
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DesignPredator)
    Here are my answers to Written, the question parts might not be correct.

    Written answers
    1ai) 8.26 (will be a range)
    ii) 2.6x10^-4

    bi)28
    ii)5.9x10^4
    iii) bottom box ticked

    2ai) Derivation
    ii) 6.06x10^6 (3SF only)

    b) Downward Curve staring at 9.81
    Minimum at g=0 at a point slightly offset from halfway closer to Venus
    Rises up to 8.87

    3a) V=mv/N

    b) Derivation


    ci) 216
    ii) 1.15x10^-19 kgms-1 OR Ns
    iii) Anti electron neutrino released also so Beta minus particles have range of Kinetic Energies upon release.

    4a) Small amplitude oscillation as only valid for small angular amplitudes.

    b) -Set up light string with Bob on the end,
    attach top of string to clamp stand boss.
    -Measure length from top to centre of Bob.
    -Release the Bob so it oscillates with small amplitude.
    -Use stop clock to measure time taken for 20 oscillations.
    -Divide this by 20 for mean T
    -Plot T^2 against L
    -Calc Gradient
    g=(4pi^2)/gradient
    -Repeat procedure

    c) -Student value 4x true value
    -Time period half so all values for T^2 will be 1/4 the true
    -Gradient is 4x lower
    -State equation or show that g is inversely proportional to gradient.

    5a) Lenz's Law: Direction of induced EMF/current is always in a direction that opposes the change that caused it.
    Faraday's Law: Induced EMF is proportional to rate of change of flux linkage.

    b) -Change in flux linkage when current flows.
    -EMF induced in wheel (or whatever it was called)
    -Current induced in the wheel as good conductor.
    -Current carrying conductor (wheel) opposes the field due to coil, therefore there is a force against the direction of motion.

    c) Wheel not in contact with electromagnet so no wear, but in brake pads there is wear due to friction.

    More energy used or less effective or heating.
    For question 3(c)(iii) I put something about the beta- particle being released at relativistic speeds so E_k = (1/2)mv^2 can't be used?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CourtlyCanter)
    I put the one with the same length as the driver since it would resonate. B if I'm not mistaken.
    yeah i didn't know what to do for the mcq, so i went for the longest one A but i'm pretty sure i got it wrong.

    for the limiting facrto though i wrote what you did but I'm sad to say we're both wrong. The limitation is that the formula is only accurate for angles of displacement of 10 degrees or less since the dervivation of the formula uses the small angle approximation to say gsin theta=g
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    kingaaran It's me Raman compare your multiple choice answers to mine

    D B B D D C D B C B C B B A A C D C C D A D C B D
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by particlestudent)
    I got -3Q/8 for electric potential, probably wrong
    And zero for that square one
    Got that
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by particlestudent)
    I got -3Q/8 for electric potential, probably wrong
    And zero for that square one
    no thats right i got that too
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheLazyGuy1)
    no thats right i got that too
    Was it not 1--4 on the top. I could be mistaken but I thought you take away potential meaning it would be 5?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheLazyGuy1)
    no thats right i got that too
    also got those
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Got that
    Do you remember any others. Transformer one with the table was B? The one with the left hand rule was 0.0075N upwards


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by C0balt)
    Got that
    If I thought N was the original mass of nucleus and got mv/(N-m) for V and attempted to find the Ea formula, would I get 0 marks on both of them? I hope I get some on the Ea one...
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yo12345)
    Was it not 1--4 on the top. I could be mistaken but I thought you take away potential meaning it would be 5?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    It's a scalar so it's the sum, 1+(-4)
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by palacefloor)
    Could someone please reply to this.

    For the first question the value of the resistor and time constant depended on the capacitor from the previous graph, so I worked all these out. However when I checked through I looked at the graph and worked out the capacitor to be very slightly different, will I drop any marks for not re-correcting the time constant and resistor or will it be fine?
    In the second part of the question it was a different capacitor so you didn't use the graph, it was a capacitor of 470x10^-6 in the second part so the time constant will be different than the one from the graph
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Height above Earth one was 3.6x10^6


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 16Characters....)
    I got those.
    (Original post by particlestudent)
    I got -3Q/8 for electric potential, probably wrong
    And zero for that square one
    Same
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yo12345)
    Do you remember any others. Transformer one with the table was B? The one with the left hand rule was 0.0075N upwards


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    transformer one in table was D
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kelvin1338)
    https://gyazo.com/1c1f8ff97e2d2369eea920c54ab0a3fa

    That's my solution to the momentum proof question for the people who struggled with it
    I read N wrong so I got V= mv/(N-m), so by attempting to find the kinetic energy formula with this would i get 0 marks?
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: January 9, 2017
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.