Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Hello,

    Has anyone got any criticism/ reform notes on:

    Criminal Damage Act 1971 ?










    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Altun63)
    Hello,

    Has anyone got any criticism/ reform notes on:

    Criminal Damage Act 1971 ?

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    What exactly do you need to know, and which sections? Your post title suggests you're in Year 9 - the TSR Resources area has Crime notes, but they may be slightly too complex.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mimir)
    What exactly do you need to know, and which sections? Your post title suggests you're in Year 9 - the TSR Resources area has Crime notes, but they may be slightly too complex.
    Property crime is the heading which criminal damage falls under in our assignment . We're evaluating most aspects of property crime, theft, robbery, burglary and criminal damage (fraud not required). For criminal damage we need to assess weather the current law is working or if there are any loop holes.

    I have had a look at the resources and couldn't find criminal damage.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Damnn its not showing up on my phone which year its in. How do I change this ?



    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Altun63)
    Damnn its not showing up on my phone which year its in. How do I change this ?



    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Dunno. Sometimes the Mods do it themselves. I'll presume A-Level to Undergraduate level. These are not comprehensive notes, but should give you a good start, off the top of my head:

    Criminal Damage is a statutory offence under the Criminal Damage Act 1971.
    s1(1) - Simple Criminal Damage
    s1(2) - Aggravated Criminal Damage; Aggravated Arson
    ss1(1) and (3) - Arson

    s2 - Making threats to destroy or damage property
    s3 - Possession with intent to destroy or damage property

    A person who, without lawful excuse, destroys or damages any property belonging to another, intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence.

    Case Law you might find useful for evaluating the Act

    "Destroy or damage" is not defined in the statute. Use the case of Samuels v Stubbs - whether or not something is damaged is a matter of degree. It is a question of fact that the court itself will consider. There is no general rule.

    In A(a juvenile) v R a youth spat on a policeman's coat. This was considered assault, but not criminal damage because the act of the accused did not mean that the victim had to spend any money to make the 'damage' good.

    In Hardman v CC Avon and Somerset it was held that the damage doesn't have to be permanent, but it must damage so that action needs to be taken to make the property good.

    Roe v Kingerlee An inmate smerared poo over the inside of his cell. This was held to be criminal damage even though the faeces could be removed.

    IE: There is no hard and fast rule on 'destroy or damage' it is a question of fact and degree.

    In Morphitas v Salmon it was held that 'damage' is not only permanent or temporary physical harm but also permanent or temporary impairment of value or usefulness.

    IE: A mere decrease of value will constitute criminal damage.

    For the Mens Rea:

    RvG to test for recklessness.

    For the Mens rea to be made out, the defendent must know that the property belongs to another or realise that it might; he must intend to damage or destroy the property; or realise that his actions might result in such damage or destruction; and in the circumstances, the risk of damage to property must be an unreasonable one to take.

    The defence of lawful excuse (s5(3) CDA) or belief in consent of the victim to damage of his property (s5(3) CDA) can be raised.


    Is all this too much detail? Of course theft, RBB need different statutory references.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mimir)
    Dunno. Sometimes the Mods do it themselves. I'll presume A-Level to Undergraduate level. These are not comprehensive notes, but should give you a good start, off the top of my head:

    Criminal Damage is a statutory offence under the Criminal Damage Act 1971.
    s1(1) - Simple Criminal Damage
    s1(2) - Aggravated Criminal Damage; Aggravated Arson
    ss1(1) and (3) - Arson

    s2 - Making threats to destroy or damage property
    s3 - Possession with intent to destroy or damage property

    A person who, without lawful excuse, destroys or damages any property belonging to another, intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence.

    Case Law you might find useful for evaluating the Act

    "Destroy or damage" is not defined in the statute. Use the case of Samuels v Stubbs - whether or not something is damaged is a matter of degree. It is a question of fact that the court itself will consider. There is no general rule.

    In A(a juvenile) v R a youth spat on a policeman's coat. This was considered assault, but not criminal damage because the act of the accused did not mean that the victim had to spend any money to make the 'damage' good.

    In Hardman v CC Avon and Somerset it was held that the damage doesn't have to be permanent, but it must damage so that action needs to be taken to make the property good.

    Roe v Kingerlee An inmate smerared poo over the inside of his cell. This was held to be criminal damage even though the faeces could be removed.

    IE: There is no hard and fast rule on 'destroy or damage' it is a question of fact and degree.

    In Morphitas v Salmon it was held that 'damage' is not only permanent or temporary physical harm but also permanent or temporary impairment of value or usefulness.

    IE: A mere decrease of value will constitute criminal damage.

    For the Mens Rea:

    RvG to test for recklessness.

    For the Mens rea to be made out, the defendent must know that the property belongs to another or realise that it might; he must intend to damage or destroy the property; or realise that his actions might result in such damage or destruction; and in the circumstances, the risk of damage to property must be an unreasonable one to take.

    The defence of lawful excuse (s5(3) CDA) or belief in consent of the victim to damage of his property (s5(3) CDA) can be raised.


    Is all this too much detail? Of course theft, RBB need different statutory references.
    This is all great thank you, just what I needed.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Help with your A-levels

All the essentials

The adventure begins mug

Student life: what to expect

What it's really like going to uni

Rosette

Essay expert

Learn to write like a pro with our ultimate essay guide.

Uni match

Uni match

Our tool will help you find the perfect course for you

Study planner

Create a study plan

Get your head around what you need to do and when with the study planner tool.

Study planner

Resources by subject

Everything from mind maps to class notes.

Hands typing

Degrees without fees

Discover more about degree-level apprenticeships.

A student doing homework

Study tips from A* students

Students who got top grades in their A-levels share their secrets

Study help links and info

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsRules and posting guidelines

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.