Turn on thread page Beta

Why don't we just grow babies in a test tube? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    We each have our sperm and eggs frozen at say like 18-21. Then later in life when we have a partner and we are ready to have a baby we just use our stored eggs + sperm, stick em together, and let the baby grow in an artificial womb.

    It must be possible. If we crack the science it then just becomes an engineering/economic problem :beard:

    Not only would we solve the whole people having babies to late we would also get rid of the whole having to give birth thing for women.

    Spoiler:
    Show
    Also get to play god :evil:
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Yes, let's take one of the most natural and beautiful life experiences, suck all the humanity out of it, and turn it into just another cold, clinical, procedure.

    And while we are at it, let's go full sociopath and cut down all the real trees and replace them artificial ones that will do the same job of producing oxygen as real trees, with the added bonus that they don't need pruning, won't catch diseases and will never die. Sure they might not be as aesthetically pleasing as real trees, but who cares about such trivial matters, function and efficiency is all matters in our brave new world.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Because nearly no one would go ahead with this.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Because that's how we eventually destroy ourselves like the Kryptonians.

    (Original post by ChaoticButterfly)
    We each have our sperm and eggs frozen at say like 18-21. Then later in life when we have a partner and we are ready to have a baby we just use our stored eggs + sperm, stick em together, and let the baby grow in an artificial womb.

    It must be possible. If we crack the science it then just becomes an engineering/economic problem :beard:

    Not only would we solve the whole people having babies to late we would also get rid of the whole having to give birth thing for women.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Also get to play god :evil:
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Giving birth sucks ass but it's an experience most women willingly want to go through, myself included. To take away that would be taking away yet another reproductive right from us.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    1. The conventional method of a quick shag in the back of a Ford Fiesta overlooking the local industrial estate costs nothing. In vitro costs thousands of pounds.

    2. We haven't developed artificial wombs. It would be very technically difficult to do.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BookBird)
    Giving birth sucks ass but it's an experience most women willingly want to go through, myself included. To take away that would be taking away yet another reproductive right from us.
    Try to help them and they say no...women logic.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChaoticButterfly)
    We each have our sperm and eggs frozen at say like 18-21. Then later in life when we have a partner and we are ready to have a baby we just use our stored eggs + sperm, stick em together, and let the baby grow in an artificial womb.

    It must be possible. If we crack the science it then just becomes an engineering/economic problem :beard:

    Not only would we solve the whole people having babies to late we would also get rid of the whole having to give birth thing for women.

    Spoiler:
    Show
    Also get to play god :evil:
    Huxlean.
    Offline

    18
    What if the test tubes are dropped by accident and you've lost your kid after spending tons on it?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChaoticButterfly)
    We each have our sperm and eggs frozen at say like 18-21. Then later in life when we have a partner and we are ready to have a baby we just use our stored eggs + sperm, stick em together, and let the baby grow in an artificial womb.

    It must be possible. If we crack the science it then just becomes an engineering/economic problem :beard:

    Not only would we solve the whole people having babies to late we would also get rid of the whole having to give birth thing for women.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Also get to play god :evil:
    It's terrifying that people actually think like this.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Greenlaner)
    Yes, let's take one of the most natural and beautiful
    Birth is not beautiful, it is disgusting.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Community Assistant
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Serine Soul)
    What if the test tubes are dropped by accident and you've lost your kid after spending tons on it?
    There would be backups in secure fridges.
    Offline

    18
    (Original post by Kvothe the arcane)
    There would be backups in secure fridges.
    What if there's a powercut?
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Study Helper
    Because mother-derived factors are essential for fetal development. Even if we do somehow create an artificial bit for the placenta to grow on to, we'd still need to hook the mum up for plasma exchange
    • Community Assistant
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Serine Soul)
    What if there's a powercut?
    Backup generators. They already have such systems in existing facilities.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Greenlaner)
    Yes, let's take one of the most natural and beautiful life experiences, suck all the humanity out of it, and turn it into just another cold, clinical, procedure.

    And while we are at it, let's go full sociopath and cut down all the real trees and replace them artificial ones that will do the same job of producing oxygen as real trees, with the added bonus that they don't need pruning, won't catch diseases and will never die. Sure they might not be as aesthetically pleasing as real trees, but who cares about such trivial matters, function and efficiency is all matters in our brave new world.
    Preach!
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Well this doesn't remind me of Frankenstein at all...

    Also many believe that one of the most beautiful things about a womans bodies is their ability to grow a baby inside them for 9 months, so taking that away would make a lot of people very angry, as it can be considered reducing the role of women in society.

    I can actually see it now, angry feminists with posters headlined "Now men reproduce better". XD
    Offline

    18
    (Original post by Serine Soul)
    What if the test tubes are dropped by accident and you've lost your kid after spending tons on it?
    Then you seek damages and compensation for emotional injury. No win, no fee.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I don't think OP is suggesting this be compulsory just optional, so calm down Luddites.

    Egg freezing is getting more and more common, and sperm freezing too especially as evidence mounts that older gametes are not so good . I see a future where many will choose to freeze gametes while they are young and healthy.

    But artificial wombs I'm not so sure. There are so many intricate biological functions going on, including a lot of communication between mother and fetus. Not sure how feasible or desirable it would be to replicate or remove that. Many women love being pregnant so I don't see much of a demand for what would surely be very expensive either. Avoiding birth with no negative consequences would be great though...
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I remember there being an outrage not too long ago over artificial wombs because some people claimed they were going to remove reproductive power from women in society.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Obviously these same people didn't have a problem with sperm banks
 
 
 
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.