Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Oh! I see now. It's because there are few women to go around, so some of the men will rape boys. Yes, that has been observed in prisons and the military as well, I think.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JordanL_)
    There are rapists among the British native population too, it's just convenient to pretend otherwise to push our xenophobe agenda, isn't it?

    Who'd have ****ing thought, though, that there's more crime when you herd people into a ****ing slum camp and make them live in total poverty with no police, healthcare, or anything else.

    If a few thousand British people had been living in the same conditions, there'd also be an abnormally large rate of crime.
    Did Holocaust survivors go out on a crime spree?


    I don't believe there is a complex reason explaining this sort of rape, it's basically, lust, lawlessness and a culture where people are not taught to respect women and children
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llys)
    I think that depends on the crime. It is reasonable to think that theft is more common in such conditions. I am not so sure about rape. I don't see how living conditions cause someone to rape. Do you have any source for that?
    This is what I could find from a quick search.

    • Browne, Salomon, & Bassuk (1999) found that women who resided in households that earned less than $10,000 annually had a 4-times-greater risk of experiencing violence than women in wealthier households.
    • Bassuk et al. (1996) found that homeless mothers reported significantly more severe instances of physical and sexual assault over their lifetime than low-income housed mothers.
    • Buka, Stichick, Birdthistle, & Felton, (2001) found youths from low-income neighborhoods witnessed significantly more severe violence (viz., murders and stabbings) than youths from middle- and upper-income neighborhoods.p
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JordanL_)
    There are rapists among the British native population too, it's just convenient to pretend otherwise to push our xenophobe agenda, isn't it?

    Who'd have ****ing thought, though, that there's more crime when you herd people into a ****ing slum camp and make them live in total poverty with no police, healthcare, or anything else.
    They choose to live there. Many times, the French social services have offered them places elsewhere, but they either refuse to leave, or rapidly go back to the Jungle.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    :sad:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Vulnerable women are more prone to get assaulted, and you take that to mean that's because of their assaulter's living conditions? :lol:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Foo.mp3)
    Don't worry, Jude Law is on hand to make sure they're all OK (another day another well meaning moron completely out of his depth) :rolleyes:
    Apparently after the cameras were off, the entire crew got robbed :laugh:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llys)
    Vulnerable women are more prone to get assaulted, and you take that to mean that's because of their assaulter's living conditions? :lol:
    I guess you just didn't read the rest, then? Convenient.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KimKallstrom)
    Apparently after the cameras were off, the entire crew got robbed :laugh:
    It's like Bono


    Thank god it's them instead of you
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JordanL_)
    I guess you just didn't read the rest, then? Convenient.
    All your sources talk about the victim's living conditions. Not about the rapists. You claimed that a man's living conditions cause him to rape. You haven't shown any evidence for that.

    For what it's worth, I do think there is evidence for it in prisons, though probably the men who rape other men there would also do it outside.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llys)
    Vulnerable women are more prone to get assaulted, and you take that to mean that's because of their assaulter's living conditions? :lol:
    Here's a better source. Page 36. Rates of all crimes except self-reported illegal drug use are negatively correlated with wealth.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JordanL_)
    Here's a better source. Page 36. Rates of all crimes except self-reported illegal drug use are negatively correlated with wealth.
    Yes, that's a good source. Where it says "adult offences", does that include sexual offences?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Roofas)
    So I suppose we should let the refugees in so we can be fair and let them have a go of abusing our children too? Racist otherwise, we need quotas. #RapeSoRefugee
    Or we could let the children being abused in, but Corbyn already suggested that and got villified by the press and insulted by the PM.

    (Original post by llys)
    I'd agree on theft etc. but do you really, genuinely, think rapists need an excuse to be rapists?
    Might not need an exuse but would need opportunity.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llys)
    Yes, that's a good source. Where it says "adult offences", does that include sexual offences?
    I'm not actually sure, it doesn't seem to say anywhere. But I'd assume so.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Under EU rules they cannot be, any person who is from what is deemed a war zone etc cannot be sent back to such a place, even if they rape and murder etc. I don't agree with that rule, I think it is ridiculous but that is the rule.
    (Original post by Howard)
    Another good reason for leaving the EU - escaping it's bizarre rules on just about everything you care to imagine.
    The UN has a word to say here, too. Getting out of the EU won't change a thing, will make it even worse. Good luck with getting a refugee/migrant/etc. out, who doesn't even has a passport or is not taken back by its home country. The EU allows Britain to sent migrants back to the countries, they went in first. Pretty nice, I would say.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nathanielle)
    The UN has a word to say here, too. Getting out of the EU won't change a thing, will make it even worse. Good luck with getting a refugee/migrant/etc. out, who doesn't even has a passport or is not taken back by its home country. The EU allows Britain to sent migrants back to the countries, they went in first. Pretty nice, I would say.
    UN laws can be ignored, many countries ignore them and get away with doing so.

    It is actually very easy to send a migrant(s) back to where they are originally from, even without a passport, you simply put them on a ship and take them there yourself, not giving the original country any say in the matter.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Gwilym101)
    Or we could let the children being abused in, but Corbyn already suggested that and got villified by the press and insulted by the PM.



    Might not need an exuse but would need opportunity.

    Anchor babies / anchor children should never be allowed into the country, it is naïve to allow them in.
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Roofas)
    So I suppose we should let the refugees in so we can be fair and let them have a go of abusing our children too? Racist otherwise, we need quotas. #RapeSoRefugee
    I know

    Leave them there or send them.back. We have our own rapists etc don't need more cnts here

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    UN laws can be ignored, many countries ignore them and get away with doing so.

    It is actually very easy to send a migrant(s) back to where they are originally from, even without a passport, you simply put them on a ship and take them there yourself, not giving the original country any say in the matter.
    LOL! The UK is not a backwater state, that doesn't want to play a role in foreign policy and risk any diplomatic connections it currently has!

    And no, it isn't. You are not allowed to just put someone on a ship, nor just sail with a ship of the Royal Navy into any state you want. UK won't risk a war for some migrants, as it will be way more expensive, than just put them into prison in the UK.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KimKallstrom)
    Apparently after the cameras were off, the entire crew got robbed :laugh:
    You're kidding me! Source?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.