Historiography: is this view a Whig, Revisionist or a post-revisionist interpret...

Watch
Mad_Cat_Lady
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#1
Hi, so I'm writing this essay (fun) and the question is whether "The actions of Charles I in the years 1641 to 16.42 led directly to the outbreak of the Civil War.’ do you think that this is a Whig, Revisionist or a post-revisionist interpretation?


Thanks.
0
reply
Cato the Elder
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#2
Report 5 years ago
#2
(Original post by Mad_Cat_Lady)
Hi, so I'm writing this essay (fun) and the question is whether "The actions of Charles I in the years 1641 to 16.42 led directly to the outbreak of the Civil War.’ do you think that this is a Whig, Revisionist or a post-revisionist interpretation?


Thanks.
A Whig interpretation. The Whigs believed that the events before the Civil War led inexorably towards conflict.
0
reply
Mad_Cat_Lady
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#3
(Original post by Cato the Elder)
A Whig interpretation. The Whigs believed that the events before the Civil War led inexorably towards conflict.
Oh, good, that's what I put in the intro.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Who is winning Euro 2020

France (85)
26.23%
England (109)
33.64%
Belgium (27)
8.33%
Germany (38)
11.73%
Spain (6)
1.85%
Italy (31)
9.57%
Netherlands (10)
3.09%
Other (Tell us who) (18)
5.56%

Watched Threads

View All