yeah but tbh, the content questions will give you more marks than the experimental side let's just hope it isnt practical and maths heavy..
I haven't touched the cardiac/haemoglobin side. But everything else is a bit of here and there I've done. I think 10% of the paper is minimum maths. So there would be some calculations
Go through the spec and see what you dont know i guess
i kind of know the topics vaguely, its exchange in plants, biodiversity and classification that i seem to struggle with the most especially because our school didnt give us a end of topic test on them as we were so pressed for time
I haven't touched the cardiac/haemoglobin side. But everything else is a bit of here and there I've done. I think 10% of the paper is minimum maths. So there would be some calculations
but hopefully it would be something like standard deviation or simpsons index of diversity as we get give the formulas, we just need to plug in the values
its when they ask you about rate of trasnpiration or rate of antibody production when it gets a bit tough for someone who doesnt understand maths (even though i do a level chemisty!)
ahh the correlation coefficient i dont think its as difficult as everyone makes it out to be you just have to rank the values in the table (highest to lowest or whatever) and then plug in the values for the equation i think then you have to compare your value with the critical value and see if the value is of significance or not
It's a but hard to type it out and explain. But my revision guide explains really well. I can take a pic and email it to you? But the purpose of spearman's rank is to see how much the values vary.
but hopefully it would be something like standard deviation or simpsons index of diversity as we get give the formulas, we just need to plug in the values
its when they ask you about rate of trasnpiration or rate of antibody production when it gets a bit tough for someone who doesnt understand maths (even though i do a level chemisty!)
Even with the equation lol I messed up in the breadth paper for that calculation question
ahh the correlation coefficient i dont think its as difficult as everyone makes it out to be you just have to rank the values in the table (highest to lowest or whatever) and then plug in the values for the equation i think then you have to compare your value with the critical value and see if the value is of significance or not
It's a but hard to type it out and explain. But my revision guide explains really well. I can take a pic and email it to you? But the purpose of spearman's rank is to see how much the values vary.