Hey guys, really struggling with this question:
The law governing whether the benefit and burden of freehold covenants runs with the land is full of arbitrary rules and illogical distinctions and needs reform.
Is it talking about the touching and running with the land requirement or am I completely off the mark, would really appreciate some help or just a nod in the right direction!
Turn on thread page Beta
Land Law Essay on Freehold Covenants watch
- Thread Starter
- 07-03-2016 22:53