Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

Kiiten superhelp thread watch

1. (Original post by kiiten)
What about this question - im not sure where you would start. Ive attached some workingAttachment 513103513107

Attachment 513103
Why don't you let and ? Then solve for and and then back-sub to find and . If you do it this way, you get:

And so you just need to solve and which should be easy (it becomes a quadratic in or ). Does that help?
2. (Original post by notnek)
You have
This is why I need to refresh the page before posting.
3. (Original post by notnek)
You have

Let and then you have

So you can ignore logs and solve these equations for and . Then substitute back in for and .
Thanks, when i substitute back in should i change a and b back to logs?
4. (Original post by kiiten)
Thanks, when i substitute back in should i change a and b back to logs?
Yes, you should (let's say , I'm not saying it is, but just an example) then you would do . Do that for whatever values of you get.
5. (Original post by Zacken)
This is why I need to refresh the page before posting.
I always use 'preview post' before posting to see if anything has been added to the thread
6. (Original post by Zacken)
Yes, you should (let's say , I'm not saying it is, but just an example) then you would do . Do that for whatever values of you get.
Ok, ive done that and I got 27 and 8 for both x and y (4 solutions). 27 is right but 8 is wrong - its supposed to be 9. Where have I gone wrong?

u + v = 5 so u = 5 - v
subbed this into uv = 6 to get v^2 - 5v - 6 =0
so v=3 v=2 which I put into u = 5 - v to get u=2 and u=3
log3x = 2 etc. to get 27 and 8 ?
7. (Original post by kiiten)
Ok, ive done that and I got 27 and 8 for both x and y (4 solutions). 27 is right but 8 is wrong - its supposed to be 9. Where have I gone wrong?

u + v = 5 so u = 5 - v
subbed this into uv = 6 to get v^2 - 5v - 6 =0
so v=3 v=2 which I put into u = 5 - v to get u=2 and u=3
log3x = 2 etc. to get 27 and 8 ?
Those are your solutions for x - what about the corresponding ones for y?
8. (Original post by Zacken)
Those are your solutions for x - what about the corresponding ones for y?
Sorry I meant x=8, x=27 and y=27, y=8. But, the answer is supposed to be 9 not 8.
9. (Original post by kiiten)
Sorry I meant x=8, x=27 and y=27, y=8. But, the answer is supposed to be 9 not 8.
If then not . :-)

In general:
10. (Original post by Zacken)
If then not . :-)

In general:
Ahh I see its another log rule. Thanks
11. Referring back to the point mentioned earlier when logs can cancel out if you had
log2 (72) = m+nlog2 (3)
I know n=2 from a previous question so would 72 = 3 ^2+m ?

I'm not sure I'm doing this right but the question is asking to show that log2 (72) = m+nlog2 (3)
12. (Original post by kiiten)
Referring back to the point mentioned earlier when logs can cancel out if you had
log2 (72) = m+nlog2 (3)
I know n=2 from a previous question so would 72 = 3 ^2+m ?
No! You can only cancel logs when you have only one log on each side.

I'm not sure I'm doing this right but the question is asking to show that log2 (72) = m+nlog2 (3)
Post the question, please.
13. (Original post by Zacken)
No! You can only cancel logs when you have only one log on each side.

Post the question, please.
1.c)

I worked out n=2 from the previous question. So if you rearrange would it be 2+m = log2(72) / log2(3)
14. (Original post by kiiten)
1.c)

I worked out n=2 from the previous question. So if you rearrange would it be 2+m = log2(72) / log2(3)
All they want you to do is write

and then you know that and that .

So that you can then write for that you've found.
15. (Original post by Zacken)
All they want you to do is write

and then you know that and that .

So that you can then write for that you've found.
Hm ok but why do you need the last part 3log2(2)=3
16. (Original post by kiiten)
Hm ok but why do you need the last part 3log2(2)=3
Because that's your .
17. (Original post by Zacken)
Because that's your .
Oh so its mlog2(3) + nlog2(3)
Thanks
18. (Original post by kiiten)
Oh so its mlog2(3) + nlog2(3)
Thanks
No! It's so and .
19. (Original post by Zacken)
No! It's so and .
Oops so does the original question mean that log2(72) = (m+n)log2(3)
= 2log2(3) + 3log2(2)
20. if you have to determine if a point is maximum of minimum do you use the first or second derivative? Also, how do you know if it is max or min - is it +ve is max?

Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: March 29, 2016
Today on TSR

Uni league tables

Do they actually matter?

University open days

• University of Exeter
Undergraduate Open Days - Exeter Campus Undergraduate
Wed, 24 Oct '18
• University of Bradford
Faculty of Health Studies Postgraduate
Wed, 24 Oct '18
• Northumbria University
Wed, 24 Oct '18
Poll
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE