# STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions

Watch
Announcements
#1
(Updated as far as #213) SimonM - 11.05.2009

Solutions for the earlier STEPs are not available on the internet, so we're making our own.
Please submit a solution, if you can, to any problem which is currently unsolved (red above).
If you see any mistakes please point them out.

PM me for the papers.

The 1994 thread is still missing a couple of solutions.

N.B. The usual paper site has the papers mislabelled (in the wrong order), check before you waste your time
Also, the number of questions has changed, and there are different proportions of purestats.

STEP I (Mathematics)
1: Solved by DFranklin
2: Scattered throughout the thread, summary by DFranklin
3: Solution by ukgea
4: Solution by Speleo
5: Solution by Speleo
6: Solution by Speleo
7: Solution by DFranklin
8: Solved by generalebriety
9: Solution by brianeverit
10: Solution by *bobo*
11: Solution by generalebriety
12: Solution by generalebriety
13: Solution by *bobo* (1), (2)
14: Solution by Glutamic Acid
15: Solution by nota bene
16: Solution by ben-smith

STEP II (Further Mathematics A)
1: Solution by nota bene
2: Solution by Rabite
3: Solution by insparato
4: Solution by generalebriety
5: Solution by Rabite
6: Solution by nota bene and insparato
7: Solution by Speleo
8: Solution by datr
9: Solution by khaixiang
10: Solution by generalebriety
11: Solution by *bobo* (1), (2), (3)
12: Solution by *bobo* (1), (2)
13: Solution by *bobo*
14: Solution by ben-smith
15: Solution by toasted-lion
16: Solution by deltinu

STEP III (Further Mathematics B)
1: Solution by generalebriety
2: Solution by justinsh
3: Solved by insparato
4: Solution by generalebriety
5: Solution by SimonM
6: Solution by insparato with comments by DFranklin
7: Solution by Rabite and Speleo
8: Solution by DFranklin
9: Solution by Speleo
10: Solution by DFranklin
11: Solution by DFranklin
12: Solution by *bobo* (1), (2)
13: Solution by brianeverit
14: Solution by Glutamic Acid
15: Solution by DFranklin
16: Solution by brianeverit

Solutions written by TSR members:
1987 - 1988 - 1989 - 1990 - 1991 - 1992 - 1993 - 1994 - 1995 - 1996 - 1997 - 1998 - 1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007
2
14 years ago
#2
Ill have a go at Question 3 on STEP I
0
14 years ago
#3
I'm on to Q1 STEP II (Further Pure A)

Is it just me or is it pure brute force?

Okay, if B knows A's numbers and they are of the form B can always chose so that he wins; the possible numbers are:
1+1+7
1+2+6
1+3+5
1+4+4
2+2+5
2+3+4
3+3+3 (and of course in other order as well...)
So here it is quite convincing B can always beat A if B knows A's numbers and the order of them.
edit: To make this clearer I'll list the possibilities explicitly like David told (so the person typing out these markschemes won't have to fill in half the answers themselves!)
A ------B
(117)(351)
(126)(351)
(135)(216)
(234)(441)
(333)(441)
(522)(144)
(144)(315)
Furthermore, if A choses 1+1+7 (or some other order of those numbers) it is impossible for A to win no matter what B choses (they can tie).

If now A gets to chose two triples and B are to find one triple that beats both it is quite clear from looking at the possible combinations that A shall not chose any of the combinations with few rearrangements (like 333 and 117 can easily be counteracted by 441). Many combinations leads to tied situations. From trial and error it is possible to eliminate all triples but some of the 531s. Testing these we can see 135/153 (by 171),135/531 (by 441), 135/513 (by 144), 135/351 (by 441), 135/315 (by 441), 153/531 (by 261), 153/513 (by 126), 153/351 (by 261), 153/315 (by 414), 531/513 (by 144), 531/351 (by 441), 531/315 (by NONE), 351/315 (by 414)
Conclusion: A shall chose 5+3+1 and 3+1+5 as his triples to always be sure of winning.

(okay and I am masochistic, here are all the stupid possible combinations:
117 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
711 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
171 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
144 (beats 531, not 315)
141 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
441 (beats 315, not 531)
135 (ties with both 315 and 531)
153 (beats 531, not 315)
531 (beats 315, ties with 531)
513 (ties with both 531 and 315)
351 (ties with both 531 and 315)
315 (beats neither 315 nor 531)
225 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
252 (beats 531, not 315)
522 (beats 315, ties with 531)
333 (ties with both 531 and 315)
234 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
243 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
432 (beats 315, ties with 531)
423 (beats 315, not 531)
342 (beats 531, ties with 315)
324 (beats neither 315 nor 531)
126 (beats 315, not 531)
162 (beats 531, not 315)
216 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
261 (beats neither 531 nor 315)
612 (beats 531, ties with 315)
621 (beats 315, ties with 531)
0
14 years ago
#4
(Original post by nota bene)
I'm on to Q1 STEP II (Further Pure A)

Is it just me or is it pure brute force?
Is this the Colonel Blotto question? I don't see anything better (in the sense that you can obviously do this question fairly quickly by brute force, so spending an hour finding a 2 line solution isn't "better" in any practical sense).
0
14 years ago
#5
Hehe colonel Blotto. Ive finished STEP I Q3 but im unsure about whether the equation of the general solution in the first part is correct. So ill post it up and you can have alook at it yourself.
0
14 years ago
#6
(Original post by nota bene)
If now A gets to chose two triples and B are to find one triple that beats both it is quite clear from looking at the possible combinations that A shall not chose any of the combinations with few rearrangements (like 333 and 117 can easily be counteracted by 441).
Possible spoiler:

Spoiler:
Show
I am quite sure you are misreading the question here. You don't need to find a winning strategy for A, you only need to confirm that (5,3,1), (3,1,5) is a winning strategy
0
14 years ago
#7
Are you sure you're doing STEP I Q3? (The papers are mislabelled)
0
14 years ago
#8
I'll have a go at (what is labelled as) STEP III question 8. (Paper reference 9465.)

Ok, here we go. (Some bits refused to be LaTeX-ed, so I've taken the tags out because I'm lazy instead of fixing the code.)

Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 5: Image dimensions are out of bounds: 607x820
\displaystyle

\text{Sphere } S \text{ intersects plane }\Pi. \\

S: x^2 + y^2 + (z-a)^2 = b^2\\

\Pi : z = 0 \\

\text{Solve simultaneously:} \\

x^2 + y^2 = b^2 - a^2. \\

\text{If } b^2 &gt; a^2\text{, then } x^2 + y^2 = c^2 \longleftarrow \text{circle} \\

\text{If } b^2 = a^2\text{, then } x^2 + y^2 = 0 \longleftarrow \text{point } (0, 0, 0) \\

\text{If } b^2 &lt; a^2\text{, then } x^2 + y^2 = -c^2 \longleftarrow \text{empty set.} \\ \\

\text{The vectors i, j and k are such that } \overrightarrow{AC} = 2\mathbf{i},\; \overrightarrow{AD} = 2\mathbf{k},\; \\

\text{and i, j and k form a right handed system of orthonormal base vectors.} \\

\overrightarrow{AC} = 2\mathbf{i}, \overrightarrow{AD} = 2\mathbf{k}, \overrightarrow{BE} = 3\mathbf{k}, \overrightarrow{CF} = 4\mathbf{k} \\

\overrightarrow{AB} = 2(\cos \frac{\pi}{3} \mathbf{i} + \sin \frac{\pi}{3} \mathbf{j}) = \mathbf{i} + \sqrt{3} \mathbf{j} \\

\overrightarrow{DE} = \overrightarrow{DA} + \overrightarrow{AB} + \overrightarrow{BE} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ \sqrt{3} \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \\

\text{Similarly, } \overrightarrow{EF} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -\sqrt{3} \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \\

\overrightarrow{DE}\cdot \overrightarrow{EF} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ \sqrt{3} \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -\sqrt{3} \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} = -1 \\

\overrightarrow{DE} \cdot \overrightarrow{EF} = DE \cdot EF \cos \angle DEF \\
1 = 5 \cos \angle DEF \\
\angle DEF = \cos^{-1}(1/5).

\text{From here it is simply a case of using a calculator to calculate } DE \text{ and applying a property of the scalar product.}
0
14 years ago
#9
(Original post by Speleo)
Are you sure you're doing STEP I Q3? (The papers are mislabelled)
No i didnt know they were mislabelled. It seems to be STEP II Q3.
0
14 years ago
#10
(Original post by generalebriety)
I'll have a go at (what is labelled as) STEP III question 8. (Paper reference 9465.)
That's STEP 1 actually. The website has mislabelled them.
0
14 years ago
#11
(Original post by DFranklin)
Possible spoiler:

Spoiler:
Show
I am quite sure you are misreading the question here. You don't need to find a winning strategy for A, you only need to confirm that (5,3,1), (3,1,5) is a winning strategy
Whatever xD (I proved they were the only ones as well lol...) Actually I'm very surprised if I just had to verify that I did the question in <10 minutes .

EDIT: STEP 1 Question 1
There are 7 ways of throwing 6:
1+5
21+4
22+4
31+31
31+32
32+31
32+32

Okay, I'll write up the steps slowly so I can follow my own train of thought...
2. we know there is no 1+1, so there is a 1 only on one die (may be multiple 1s though)
3.There are two ways of getting 3 this means there is a duplication of either 2s or 1s
4. Only one combination and as we know there is at least one 1 there must be at least one 3(not on the same die as the one/s) OR there must be a two on one die and a two on the other, however the latter leads up the wrong creek pretty soon after testing it.
5. Again only one combination and we therefore know there must be at least one 4 (not on the same die as the one/s)
Summary: Die I has a 1 and Die II has one 3 and one 4 and no 1s. (also we know there is a duplication of either a 1 or a 2 (on different dice), which implies there is no 2 on the die with the one/s) As there is only one way of getting a sum of 4 there must only be one 1, therefore duplicate 2s. So we now have Die I: 1 and Die II: 2 2 3 4 (no 1s)
6. For there to be four ways of getting six it is either 4 on die I and 55 on die II or 5555 on die II but the latter obviously fails if we attempt to continue on that track.
7. There are three ways of getting the sum 7 and we have one hitherto (and die II we have all positions filled) which means there is one 5 on die I.
8-12. We fill up with 6s and check that the conditions holds, which they seem to do; therefore the dice had the numbers 145666 respectively 223455.
0
14 years ago
#12
STEP II Question 3

a)

So

Multiply by -3u

b)

Substitute back in

Integrating factor

2
14 years ago
#13
I really hate LaTeX.
1
14 years ago
#14
I've done STEP II (paper A), question 2, 3, 8 and STEP III (paper B), question 1, 2, 4, 9 awhile ago. So I won't do them again and will try other questions. Here's question 9 of STEP II:

Sorry, I know this is very ugly, if it's too much of an eyesore I will remove it for conformity's sake.

This question seems way too easy compared to others, so perhaps I've overlooked something.
1
14 years ago
#15
Ok, done one question.
0
14 years ago
#16
II/7

I've decided that writing questions out in text is less legible and more time consuming than just scanning them in, and latex takes far too long for me.

Tell me if the writing's too faint, I'm going to use pen next time anyway.
0
14 years ago
#17
(Original post by insparato)
Ill have a go at Question 3 on STEP I
Did you manage to sort that out. I think I have a solution but its a bit og a mess for the second part.

Edit: looks like i fell victim to the labeling errors. Seen the soln above.
0
14 years ago
#18
STEP I (paper 9465) Q3

I shall do this question in a lot of cases. Not knowing really how to indent properly on TSR, I'll use a "case 1.2.4" notation, where case 1. Hope you'll understand.

(i)
Assume integers p, q, r solve the equation.

Case 1:
Then

Case 2:
Then

Also, we have

Case 2.1:
Then

Case 2.2:
From this follows r = 6, and so (p, q, r) = (2, 3, 6) is a solution.

Case 2.3:
From this follows r = 4, and so (p, q, r) = (2, 4, 4) is a solution.

Case 2.4:
Then

and so

(Now we've covered all the cases that can arise when .)
Case 3:
Then

and

Case 3.1
Then r = 3, and we've found the solution (p, q, r) = (3, 3, 3)

Case 3.2
Then

and

(Now we've covered all the cases that can arise when .)

Case 4:
Then
and

Now we've covered all the cases, and the only solutions are thus (p, q, r) = (2, 3, 6), (2, 4, 4) and (3, 3, 3).

(ii)
Assume integers p, q, r satisfy the inequality.

Case 1:
This has already been given in the question. (Besides i think there's a typo in the paper, it should be . But who cares...)

Case 2:
Then the inequality becomes

and we of course also have .

Case 2.1:
Then the inequality becomes

which is satisfied by any integer .

Case 2.2:
Then the inequality becomes

which for positive r is equivalent to [/latex]r < 6[/latex]
and hence all solutions for this case are given by (p, q, r) = (2, 3, 3), (2, 3, 4) and (2, 3, 5).

Case 2.3:
Then and

(Now we have covered all the cases that can arise when q = 2.)

Case 3:
Then and so

Now all the cases have been covered, and hence the only solutions other than (1, m, n) are
(2, 2, r) where r can be any integer larger than or equal to 2,
(2, 3, 3)
(2, 3, 4)
and
(2, 3, 5).
1
14 years ago
#19
Ive nearly finished STEP III Question 3 (I think its III) Its a matrices one.
0
14 years ago
#20
I/4

I like pencil vv

N.B. these are rough solutions, I'd write much more explanation of what was happening in the real exam.
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Do you think receiving Teacher Assessed Grades will impact your future?

I'm worried it will negatively impact me getting into university/college (135)
42.19%
I'm worried that I’m not academically prepared for the next stage in my educational journey (37)
11.56%
I'm worried it will impact my future career (27)
8.44%
I'm worried that my grades will be seen as ‘lesser’ because I didn’t take exams (68)
21.25%
I don’t think that receiving these grades will impact my future (34)
10.63%
I think that receiving these grades will affect me in another way (let us know in the discussion!) (19)
5.94%