Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by economicss)
    I don't suppose anyone can remember the exact values for question 2 contingency tables, I somehow got a test statistic of 4.6 but no idea where I went wrong! Thanks
    Oi was 12, 29, 9 and then second row was 15, 23, 22. Used my graphic calc to check it so have the values still.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coolguy123456)
    Oi was 12, 29, 9 and then second row was 15, 23, 22. Used my graphic calc to check it so have the values still.
    Thank you! Really cannot figure out where I went wrong, think I must have got an expected value wrong somewhere, do you know please how follow through marks work for contingency table questions, I had the correct critical value but I accepted H0 rather than rejecting it, thanks
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Anyone remember how to do Q5 c) ? Did it wrong but I want to know how to do it.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Quick voting on S3 in this thread
    http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=4117063
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by economicss)
    Thank you! Really cannot figure out where I went wrong, think I must have got an expected value wrong somewhere, do you know please how follow through marks work for contingency table questions, I had the correct critical value but I accepted H0 rather than rejecting it, thanks
    I can't remember how they allocate it but if you go on June 2015 or 2014 papers, one of the recent ones and check how they did it there then you'll get an idea of how many marks you'll get. Also, do you remember how many marks the first +ve correlation one was? I got the 0.75 but the part b of it where you had to test it, i think i accepted H0 when i should have rejected it as i mis-read a value from the table.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coolguy123456)
    I can't remember how they allocate it but if you go on June 2015 or 2014 papers, one of the recent ones and check how they did it there then you'll get an idea of how many marks you'll get. Also, do you remember how many marks the first +ve correlation one was? I got the 0.75 but the part b of it where you had to test it, i think i accepted H0 when i should have rejected it as i mis-read a value from the table.
    Okay thank you I think it was only 2 marks but not completely sure
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zzzxxxxxxxx)
    Anyone remember how to do Q5 c) ? Did it wrong but I want to know how to do it.
    Can figure out \sum{x} by doing (old mean*35+new value) then finding the new mean from this
    Can figure out \sum{x^2} by rearranging the formula for s^2 to get it and adding the new value squared.
    These two values are all you need to figure out the new s^2
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by economicss)
    Okay thank you I think it was only 2 marks but not completely sure
    Thanks, also do you know the last part of that question where it asked for a comment thing on the conclusions from earlier, was it a 1 marker or 2?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coolguy123456)
    Thanks, also do you know the last part of that question where it asked for a comment thing on the conclusions from earlier, was it a 1 marker or 2?
    1 mark I believe
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mav1)
    1 mark I believe
    Thank you! Also for the last one with the CI, i said the 20% is not in the CI so should change the stated value. I didn't mention to lower it just to "change it". Would this get me the 2 marks or would i lose out on 1?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coolguy123456)
    Thank you! Also for the last one with the CI, i said the 20% is not in the CI so should change the stated value. I didn't mention to lower it just to "change it". Would this get me the 2 marks or would i lose out on 1?
    Depends how lenient they are, I would have thought if you said it was not in it this will be fine. Unless they are very harsh
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Easy
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mav1)
    Can figure out \sum{x} by doing (old mean*35+new value) then finding the new mean from this
    Can figure out \sum{x^2} by rearranging the formula for s^2 to get it and adding the new value squared.
    These two values are all you need to figure out the new s^2
    Thanks,
    and do you remember the marks worth for that question?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tazza ma razza)
    Easy
    FP2 last year was easy as well but boundaries were harsh.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I have three questions:
    -In the association question, I calculated one of the expected frequencies wrong. My method was correct and think my conclusion was correct. That is, rejecting H0. Does anyone have any idea of how many marks will I lose?
    -How many marks was the 'what have you assumed?' question
    -How many marks was the 'what should paul suggest?' question
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zzzxxxxxxxx)
    Thanks,
    and do you remember the marks worth for that question?
    5 I think, perhaps 6
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by pragyas265)
    I have three questions:
    -In the association question, I calculated one of the expected frequencies wrong. My method was correct and think my conclusion was correct. That is, rejecting H0. Does anyone have any idea of how many marks will I lose?
    -How many marks was the 'what have you assumed?' question
    -How many marks was the 'what should paul suggest?' question
    - between 1 and 3 marks I guess
    - 2 marks
    - 1 mark I think
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mav1)
    - between 1 and 3 marks I guess
    - 2 marks
    - 1 mark I think
    Thankyou v much!
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    A boundary?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Does anyone know if Arsey will be doing an unofficial mark scheme?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Have you ever participated in a Secret Santa?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.