Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Abirella)
    Thank You. I was confused because people were talking about Milgram question.
    Me too! I thought I missed out a page or something haha
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Guys is it okay if i said that the strange situation is based around western culture and that it may not be relevant if performed in other cultures. BUT i forgot to mention that its imposed etic so do i still get the mark
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the.chantele)
    I put range and mean
    me too, i didn't put median do u still think it's a mark
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Anaw015)
    I read the question wrong then because I thought it said one example so I linked all of them to one
    No, you did it wrong BUT you will gain 4 marks or 3 depends.

    Its out of 6 right?

    If so...you might gain 4 marks.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sophieee0933)
    me too, i didn't put median do u still think it's a mark
    There are many you could have put l was debating whether to put median or range so l put range.

    I love 2 questions in he paper:

    Researcher A and Research B where you had to put Harlow with the rhesus monkeys and Lorenz with the geese
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I put Lorenz Korenz But the forename is not right, will i still get a mark ?? did the same with harlow
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by maxtheloo)
    I put Lorenz Korenz But the forename is not right, will i still get a mark ?? did the same with harlow
    So what did you put? Lorenz Korenz and Harlow Parlow ? YES you would still get the marks for the first names they don't take away marks for adding info they only add give marks.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Predictions for unit 2?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I put Korenz Lorenz and John Harlow, should get the marks right ?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yukio.X)
    Wow u were accurate
    I know! Slightly wrong with the Milgram but still thought it'd be on variations and an 8 Marker purely based on the fact that last years included a 12 mark on studies of social influence so i thought they're not going to give you a study but variation.

    The strange situation prediction was a hit

    And the 12 marker was on the working not multistore but there was a 6 marker on types of LTM
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hi I'm new to this discussion I also sat this exam today so glad its over n done with but next week all over again lol.
    How did people find the exam, I thought the social influence section was really nice, personally I found memory the essay question a bit iffy. I'm not to sure if I did it right but I defined central executive, phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad and episodic buffer then gave research evidence for them. Then I evaluated the wmm as a whole but I'm not to sure if that was right though would I get marks for that. I found attachment okay as well.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    What did everyone put for types of LTM?
    Bearing in mind there was a case study to it
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    The last 12 marker though?! I was expecting an 'explain and evaluate' but instead it said 'Discuss' anyone else get confused at that?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    For the Stm multi-store questions I put Miller 7+/-2 and Peterson and Jacobs and explained how they affected arm eg new information displaced old as limited in capacity and that as it is in a fragile state and can quickly disappear you have to repeat it over and over again.

    Was it right?
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Anaw015)
    For the Stm multi-store questions I put Miller 7+/-2 and Peterson and Jacobs and explained how they affected arm eg new information displaced old as limited in capacity and that as it is in a fragile state and can quickly disappear you have to repeat it over and over again.

    Was it right?
    i dont think displacement in STM was in this spec so not sure if you will get marks for it
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    I assumed multi-store model, as it was to do with rehearsal, would be the serial position effect - primary and recency?

    I did horrible though. Thought I was making great time, took my time on what I thought was my last question (the 12-marker). Had another quick flick through with just over 10-minutes to go....and realized I'd somehow completely skipped the other 12 marker and the 6-marker in the same section.

    Hustled down and just wrote for my life. But, there is no way I picked-up anymore than half marks them. I just wasn't in the right frame of mind today though. I usually relish in exams...but today I just wanted to run away, the wording of it all was frustrating and I didn't feel comfortable. I rarely drop more than a couple of marks in my mocks though, and I could have nailed the ones I missed.

    I'm better at the next paper, anyway...so I'm gonna leave no stone unturned and try to get near-enough full marks in the hope I can balance it out, and come-out with a good enough grade. Least this doesn't count towards the full A-level. Trying for medicine though - and I'm usually straight A's - so I'm feeling so emotional/angry.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Ok so I remembered Harlow's name wrong and put Herlitz (I was thinking about Lorenz at the same time so I mixed them together) Would they still know who I was talking about?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    To be honest, im revising for the second paper to try and ace it and gain...almost full marks.

    I want that A!!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Lol, the way you guys are talking about this on a thread designed for the new spec.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    I have come to the conclusion that, the CGP revision book that I've mostly relied on is rubbish for the new spec' - not once does it mention 'self-report', for example. CGP has been great for biology A-level though.

    I'd sell-it-on, if it wasn't for the fear of dooming someone one else.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.