x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Edexcel FP1 Thread - 20th May, 2016 watch

1. (Original post by kingaaran)
They're written by the same people, so, apart from the bits of roots, everything else has the potentiality to make an appearance in a standard FP1 Paper
Well im going to die!
Can you help with the induction for Jan 2016 IAL Quesiton 9?

Thanks much apreciated!
2. Did you see my working I posted earlier?

Posted from TSR Mobile
3. (Original post by economicss)
Not very far at all, only got the equation! Please could you post your working for it have you done part b? Thanks
Did you see my working out I posted earlier?

Posted from TSR Mobile
4. (Original post by fpmaniac)
Can you properly explain to me how to do sigma r=0 to r=n with some examples. I still dont get it....
Remember

That's all you need to know. You want to just get a 1 at the bottom, so that you can then use your standard formulae
5. (Original post by Hot&SpicyChicken)
Well im going to die!
Can you help with the induction for Jan 2016 IAL Quesiton 9?

Thanks much apreciated!
What have you tried?
6. question: for the argument of z

i know you do tan^-1 (b/a) of a + bi

but do you keep a and b exactly how they are, or are they the mod of a and b?

example:
z = 1 - i

would it be tan-1(-1/1) or simply tan-1(1/1)... and why?
7. (Original post by TomWeller)
question: for the argument of z

i know you do tan^-1 (b/a) of a + bi

but do you keep a and b exactly how they are, or are they the mod of a and b?

example:
z = 1 - i

would it be tan-1(-1/1) or simply tan-1(1/1)... and why?
I find it easiest to draw z on an Argand diagram and use tan-1 of the mod of b/a, then draw on the diagram which angle you've calculated and from that work out the argument of z
8. (Original post by TomWeller)
question: for the argument of z

i know you do tan^-1 (b/a) of a + bi

but do you keep a and b exactly how they are, or are they the mod of a and b?

example:
z = 1 - i

would it be tan-1(-1/1) or simply tan-1(1/1)... and why?
You should compute a and b without their signs and then use the signs (and an Argand diagram, I hope) to determine what the argument will be.

For example, -2-3i, will be worked out -pi + arctan(3/2), and 2+3i, just arctan(3/2).
9. I dont understand what to use when doing proof for divisibility.

Do you prove for f(k+1) then prove thats divisible by x
or do you prove f(k+1)-f(k) is divisible by x
or do you prove f(k+1) -nf(k) is divisible by x?

How do I know which to do?
10. (Original post by kingaaran)
You should compute a and b without their signs and then use the signs (and an Argand diagram, I hope) to determine what the argument will be.

For example, -2-3i, will be worked out -pi + arctan(3/2), and 2+3i, just arctan(3/2).
Thank you! i think there may a mistake on one of my teacher's worksheets which is annoying which uses a and b exactly how they are with the negative sign. Thank you
11. (Original post by fpmaniac)
So what would it be for sigma r=0 r=n for r and sigma r=0 and r=n for rsquared
Well, think about it.. how many terms are there from r = 0 to n?
12. (Original post by kingaaran)
Solution on post 940
ahh thank you!!
13. (Original post by AlfieClements)
I dont understand what to use when doing proof for divisibility.

Do you prove for f(k+1) then prove thats divisible by x
or do you prove f(k+1)-f(k) is divisible by x
or do you prove f(k+1) -nf(k) is divisible by x?

How do I know which to do?
Always write f(k+1) and then aim to find f(k) within the equation
14. Can someone post a couple of tricky FP1 questions? The past papers are very repetitive.
15. (Original post by hogree)
Question.

When you differentiate a parabola (so something with the equation y2 = 4ax) would you always make the differential a +/- or would you put it as simply a +? Because if leaving it just as a +, it gives you just one equation when you plug in, because obviously there is just one gradient.. But a +/- makes more sense.

Anyone mind clearing this up?
Take the + because you're normally only concerned with the bit above the axis.
16. (Original post by techfan42)
Always write f(k+1) and then aim to find f(k) within the equation
Okay, then if it doesn't work should I do f(k+1) - f(k)?
17. (Original post by Hot&SpicyChicken)
Well im going to die!
Can you help with the induction for Jan 2016 IAL Quesiton 9?

Thanks much apreciated!
sorry for the ink smudge
Attached Images

18. (Original post by alfmeister)
Did you see my working out I posted earlier?

Posted from TSR Mobile
19. (Original post by AlfieClements)
Okay, then if it doesn't work should I do f(k+1) - f(k)?
It always works. I used to do f(k+1) +/- f(k), but then used to get the questions wrong sometimes. This is much easier as it always works also it's the method always used in the FP1 model answers
20. (Original post by alfmeister)
Did you see my working out I posted earlier?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ah just found it, thanks so much for that I don't suppose you've done part b? Thanks

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: August 18, 2016
Today on TSR

### How much will your degree earn you?

Find out where yours ranks...

### I do my boyfriend's uni assignments

Poll
Useful resources

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsStudy Help rules and posting guidelinesLaTex guide for writing equations on TSR

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE