Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Name:  Screenshot_2016-03-19-13-58-57.png
Views: 122
Size:  169.3 KB for 2b) the answer is 900n but I don't understand how it's worked out. I used the I=FT method. I worked out the impulse which is 2880 but in the markscheme impulse is simply 3000*2.4. I don't really get what happened here. Thanks
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Name:  1458396231093-425846879.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  312.8 KB here is my working. Thanks.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    Name:  1458396231093-425846879.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  312.8 KB here is my working. Thanks.
    I don't follow your calculation. The required impulse to bring the coupled units to a halt is

    I = mv-mu = 3000 \times 2.4 - 3000 \times 0 = 3000 \times 2.4 \\ = 7200 \text{ N s} .
    • Community Assistant
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Study Helper
    (Original post by coconut64)
    Name:  1458396231093-425846879.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  312.8 KB here is my working. Thanks.
    You have worked out the impulse applied to A in the collision. But part (b) is about the force applied after the collision.

    You should be working out the impulse applied to the combined mass that brings the trucks to rest.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by atsruser)
    I don't follow your calculation. The required impulse to bring the coupled units to a halt is

    I = mv-mu = 3000 \times 2.4 - 3000 \times 0 = 3000 \times 2.4 \\ = 7200 \text{ N s} .
    Is this for particle b or a ? Thanks
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    Is this for particle b or a ? Thanks
    "coupled unit" means that B and A are now struck together and treated as one particle.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    "coupled unit" means that B and A are now struck together and treated as one particle.
    I understand this but where does 3000*0 come from?? Thanks
    The particles are at rest after 8s. So would it be I=3000(0) - 3000(-2.4)?
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    I understand this but where does 3000*0 come from?? Thanks
    Halt: 0 \, \text{ms}^{-1}. So m \times \text{velocity at halt} = 3000 \times 0 = 0.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Halt: 0 \, \text{ms}^{-1}. So m \times \text{velocity at halt} = 3000 \times 0 = 0.
    The particles are at rest after 8s. So would it be I=3000(0) - 3000(-2.4)?
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    The particles are at rest after 8s. So would it be I=3000(0) - 3000(-2.4)?
    Which is precisely the same thing as what atsuser wrote, just in a different format.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Which is precisely the same thing as what atsuser wrote, just in a different format.
    So is that right?? Only that makes sense to me...
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    So is that right?? Only that makes sense to me...
    Uh, yeah - seems fine to me.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Uh, yeah - seems fine to me.
    Cheers.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    The particles are at rest after 8s. So would it be I=3000(0) - 3000(-2.4)?
    There's a sign error in my earlier post - I swapped v and u - but it doesn't make much difference to the principle, or to the result. You're still trying to destroy 7200 N s of momentum by applying a frictional force, regardless of which way the vector is pointing.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by coconut64)
    The particles are at rest after 8s. So would it be I=3000(0) - 3000(-2.4)?
    I can't see why you've written -2.4 - you haven't explicitly shown a +ve direction in your diagram, and I would have thought that it would be more natural to take "right = +ve" here.

    It's a good idea always to label the direction of +ve vectors clearly before you start work - it's easy to become confused otherwise.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by atsruser)
    I can't see why you've written -2.4 - you haven't explicitly shown a +ve direction in your diagram, and I would have thought that it would be more natural to take "right = +ve" here.

    It's a good idea always to label the direction of +ve vectors clearly before you start work - it's easy to become confused otherwise.
    The direction of impulse would be to the right sorry I can't really make it clear by typing it out.Thanks.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: March 19, 2016

University open days

  1. Norwich University of the Arts
    Postgraduate Open Days Postgraduate
    Thu, 19 Jul '18
  2. University of Sunderland
    Postgraduate Open Day Postgraduate
    Thu, 19 Jul '18
  3. Plymouth College of Art
    All MA Programmes Postgraduate
    Thu, 19 Jul '18
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.