Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1458421157.408944.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  99.3 KB

    Can someone help in part C?
    I got that the modulus of X should be less than 1 but mark scheme states that it must be less than half. Can anyone explain why?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lilly1234567890)
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1458421157.408944.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  99.3 KB

    Can someone help in part C?
    I got that the modulus of X should be less than 1 but mark scheme states that it must be less than half. Can anyone explain why?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    |2x| < 1
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lilly1234567890)
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1458421157.408944.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  99.3 KB

    Can someone help in part C?
    I got that the modulus of X should be less than 1 but mark scheme states that it must be less than half. Can anyone explain why?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    because of the  \displaystyle \left(1+2x\right) term on the bottom of the fraction

    I havent done the question so i dont know what the partial fractions are but at some stage you have to expand  \displaystyle \left(1+2x\right)^{-1} using the binomial expansion, this is why |x|<0.5
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lilly1234567890)
    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1458421157.408944.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  99.3 KB

    Can someone help in part C?
    I got that the modulus of X should be less than 1 but mark scheme states that it must be less than half. Can anyone explain why?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    In general, the expansion of (1+ax)^{n} for non-natural n is only valid for |ax| &lt; 1.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    In general, the expansion of (1+ax)^{n} for non-natural n is only valid for |ax| &lt; 1.
    what if we look at the other expansion 1-x, wont it then be the modulus of x is less than 1
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lilly1234567890)
    what if we look at the other expansion 1-x, wont it then be the modulus of x is less than 1
    Yes.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lilly1234567890)
    what if we look at the other expansion 1-x, wont it then be the modulus of x is less than 1
    But you are doing two expansions. You need the range of values for which both are valid, i.e. the smaller range.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.