Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Hiya

    I was just doing q2 and has just gotten to the part where I subbed in the values to get it all in terms of u, but disaster struck when du was wildly in the middle of the equation.

    So, my question is is it the same as having du at the end of the equation as it is multiplied or have I just gotten in to a complete mess?

    Also: I have just realised that there should be brackets around the  e^2 -e
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Thanks!
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    Hiya

    I was just doing q2 and has just gotten to the part where I subbed in the values to get it all in terms of u, but disaster struck when du was wildly in the middle of the equation.

    So, my question is is it the same as having du at the end of the equation as it is multiplied or have I just gotten in to a complete mess?

    Also: I have just realised that there should be brackets around the  e^2 -e
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Thanks!
    Yes, I think you're fine, you can just move the du over to the end if you wish (don't forget the -!)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    Yes, I think you're fine, you can just move the du over to the end if you wish (don't forget the -!)
    So is this right?
    Spoiler:
    Show
    The du being multiplied by a certain part is stressing me out
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    So is this right?
    Spoiler:
    Show
    The du being multiplied by a certain part is stressing me out
    Should be fine, just don't forget that e^u is being multiplied by (e-e^2), you may make a mistake as your brackets aren't always there.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    So is this right?
    Spoiler:
    Show
    The du being multiplied by a certain part is stressing me out
    I think there is an equal missing in the printed question.
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    Welcome Squad
    Ok so Ive dont it and all I belive there is a misprint in the question they forgot the = signt after the dx so actually du is not in a middle of an equation there is an equal sign after the du so you need show how when u integrate you will get e(e-1).

    So techniclly you will inegrate -eu which is the same -eu that is the same as -ecos(X)+1 it will eventually give you the same answer just try it out. hope that is what u were asking?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    Should be fine, just don't forget that e^u is being multiplied by (e-e^2), you may make a mistake as your brackets aren't always there.
    (Original post by M14B)
    I think there is an equal missing in the printed question.
    (Original post by koolgurl14)
    Ok so Ive dont it and all I belive there is a misprint in the question they forgot the = signt after the dx so actually du is not in a middle of an equation there is an equal sign after the du so you need show how when u integrate you will get e(e-1).

    So techniclly you will inegrate -eu which is the same -eu that is the same as -ecos(X)+1 it will eventually give you the same answer just try it out. hope that is what u were asking?
    Ah okay after a few minutes googling this question. It turns out this question was printed like this, but you're right, there's supposed to be an equals sign between dx and e(e-1)

    Thank you all for your help!

    I shall be notifying my teacher and complaining that she failed to check the homework
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    :facepalm2: what was I thinking..

    well done anonwinner
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    x
    Okay sorry but same (corrected) question, new problem. I now have this with the negative respect to u, would I just multiply everything by -1/take it out as a factor?

    Also, this is just a proving question right? so showing that the first part is the same as e(e-1) or would I need to integrate it as well?
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    Okay sorry but same (corrected) question, new problem. I now have this with the negative respect to u, would I just multiply everything by -1/take it out as a factor?

    Also, this is just a proving question right? so showing that the first part is the same as e(e-1) or would I need to integrate it as well?
    It's just -1 * du so you can move the -1 outside the integral if you want as it is a constant.

    Also, it's asking you to evaluate it so... that should answer your question
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    i tried this q but got up to e^u(e^2-e) is this q wrong? i cant get further


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    It's just -1 * du so you can move the -1 outside the integral if you want as it is a constant.

    Also, it's asking you to evaluate it so... that should answer your question
    Ah okay, solved! I've finally cracked this question!

    Thanks so much for your help
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by ranz)
    i tried this q but got up to e^u(e^2-e) is this q wrong? i cant get further


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    The question is wrong, it seems. There should be an = sign after the dx.

    (Original post by KaylaB)
    Ah okay, solved! I've finally cracked this question!

    Thanks so much for your help
    :hat2:
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    wait i tried it again and u just dont integrate(e^2-e) i got 21.8 as the answer


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ranz)
    wait i tried it again and u just dont integrate(e^2-e) i got 21.8 as the answer


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    You don't integrate the e(e-1) part, you're just proving that the first part can be written as that in the end
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    You don't integrate the e(e-1) part, you're just proving that the first part can be written as that in the end
    oh isnt this a solve q?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ranz)
    oh isnt this a solve q?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Nah, that's what I thought at the start too
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KaylaB)
    Nah, that's what I thought at the start too
    i tried proving it but i just ended up with e^cosx+1/sinx + x not e(e-1) im probably doing something wrong


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ranz)
    i tried proving it but i just ended up with e^cosx+1/sinx + x not e(e-1) im probably doing something wrong


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    It wants you to do it all in terms of u. So this is how I did it
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    ohhh i see, thankkks! i get it now 😊😊


    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: March 21, 2016

2,574

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.