Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Official OCR New Spec AS Level Physics: Depth in physics - 9th of May Watch

    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    That was shocking
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    That was ez pz tbh
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    grade boundaries should be pretty high... straight forward paper
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    Godbless ocr
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Parhomus)
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    500 somethinf hbu
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mahmzo)
    500 somethinf hbu
    Oh I got 5.5 x 10^3
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AlexHodder)
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    Wut

    (Original post by Parhomus)
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    5857 ohms metres^-2
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Parhomus)
    Oh I got 5.5 x 10^3
    It was a number with 5 maybe 5500 id remember
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2
    yeah i got 5187 or something
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=h3rmit;65604179]Wut

    I think q1e? about if you can make out log2
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2
    Close enough our line of best fit was probs only slightly different
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mahmzo)
    500 somethinf hbu
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2

    Yeah i remember now. I got 5800 exactly lol
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=AlexHodder;65604271]
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut

    I think q1e? about if you can make out log2
    sorry this is the depth physics exam right?
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AlexHodder)
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    how many marks was this? don't remeber it
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yelash)
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    The L^2 values were all 10^-3, so you should have got 6250
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yelash)
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    The X axis was x10^-3 so when u divide it becomes what u see
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    My bad I guess I was doing a different OCR paper at the same time?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.