Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    That was shocking
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    That was ez pz tbh
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    grade boundaries should be pretty high... straight forward paper
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    Godbless ocr
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Parhomus)
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    500 somethinf hbu
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mahmzo)
    500 somethinf hbu
    Oh I got 5.5 x 10^3
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AlexHodder)
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    Wut

    (Original post by Parhomus)
    The only one I'm not sure about was the Gradient what did people get?
    5857 ohms metres^-2
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Parhomus)
    Oh I got 5.5 x 10^3
    It was a number with 5 maybe 5500 id remember
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2
    yeah i got 5187 or something
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=h3rmit;65604179]Wut

    I think q1e? about if you can make out log2
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2
    Close enough our line of best fit was probs only slightly different
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mahmzo)
    500 somethinf hbu
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut



    5857 ohms metres^-2

    Yeah i remember now. I got 5800 exactly lol
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=AlexHodder;65604271]
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Wut

    I think q1e? about if you can make out log2
    sorry this is the depth physics exam right?
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AlexHodder)
    Pretty nice, what did you guys put for the question about if you can make out the 2 in the image?
    how many marks was this? don't remeber it
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yelash)
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    The L^2 values were all 10^-3, so you should have got 6250
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yelash)
    I didn't do the *10-7 or 10- whatever bit when calculating the gradient. Why do you have to do this, when? It meant I got like 6.25
    The X axis was x10^-3 so when u divide it becomes what u see
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    My bad I guess I was doing a different OCR paper at the same time?
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: June 13, 2016

1,038

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.