Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    good luck everyone
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DORI)
    thats what i thought but apparently its not like that......
    he would rather play 4 than play 2
    I meant why would he play 2 when he can play 4. If you are looking from the defensive players prespective, take the negative of all values.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    1650 5200.........??
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Can someone please do me a favour and tell me the exact thing they got for the last dynammic programming question
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sallekmo)
    Can someone please do me a favour and tell me the exact thing they got for the last dynammic programming question
    5225 i think?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by YZ31618)
    5225 i think?
    I got 1700 for part a and 5550 for part b
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    i got 1700 and last part 5550. Not sure if correct tho
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    i got 1700 and 5550 for dynamic programming.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    Made a mistake somewhere in my tables and got 2000 for last q. Got the programming part right tho. Wonder how harsh the markscheme will be. Maybe 2 accuracy mark, and then 1 accuracy mark in the next part.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by domgreen69)
    i got 1700 and 5550 for dynamic programming.
    I dont want the answer i want the full working out lol
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    - Simplex not optimal because you had -5s?
    - Hungarian 248
    - Flow one you got a flow Max flow of 62 and proved it with min cut, max flow theorem?
    - Gametheory 0 does not equal -4 therefore it stable?
    - North west corner method dummy with value 14 so they both are 99?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TrueDAN)
    - Simplex not optimal because you had -5s?
    - Hungarian 248
    - Flow one you got a flow Max flow of 62 and proved it with min cut, max flow theorem?
    - Gametheory 0 does not equal -4 therefore it stable?
    - North west corner method dummy with value 14 so they both are 99?
    Got the same thing. Internet high five!
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    got 1700
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TrueDAN)
    - Simplex not optimal because you had -5s?
    - Hungarian 248
    - Flow one you got a flow Max flow of 62 and proved it with min cut, max flow theorem?
    - Gametheory 0 does not equal -4 therefore it stable?
    - North west corner method dummy with value 14 so they both are 99?
    Can you remember how you managed to increase the flow by three units? I couldnt find a route to increase any more than 2...
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I think i had a brain fart on the augmented flow diagram. Couldn't find a route from S to T that allowed an extra 3 units to flow??
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TrueDAN)
    - Simplex not optimal because you had -5s?
    - Hungarian 248
    - Flow one you got a flow Max flow of 62 and proved it with min cut, max flow theorem?
    - Gametheory 0 does not equal -4 therefore it stable?
    - North west corner method dummy with value 14 so they both are 99?
    therefore it not stable
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Stormin')
    I think i had a brain fart on the augmented flow diagram. Couldn't find a route from S to T that allowed an extra 3 units to flow??
    same so i just went from s to b
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TrueDAN)
    - Simplex not optimal because you had -5s?
    - Hungarian 248
    - Flow one you got a flow Max flow of 62 and proved it with min cut, max flow theorem?
    - Gametheory 0 does not equal -4 therefore it stable?
    - North west corner method dummy with value 14 so they both are 99?
    I agree
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    **** I didnt see the last bit where you calculate 5550 How many marks was it?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bekah22)
    Can you remember how you managed to increase the flow by three units? I couldnt find a route to increase any more than 2...
    You needed to use backflow which would reduce the arc by 3 that seemed like it could only be increased by 2.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.