Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Underwood)
    Wait, what was I wrong about? lol
    (Original post by Frank Underwood)
    Trolling again, I see
    Was your response to me saying "This guy did not incite hatred. He was not racist. He was not abusive. He was not threatening"

    The police conclusion shows I was correct, and you were woefully wrong. Unlucky, i can see from your postings how difficult all this is for you, yano thinking clearly and logically without bias. Sucks to be you
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Betelgeuse-)
    Was your response to me saying "This guy did not incite hatred. He was not racist. He was not abusive. He was not threatening"

    The police conclusion shows I was correct, and you were woefully wrong. Unlucky, i can see from your postings how difficult all this is for you, yano thinking clearly and logically without bias. Sucks to be you
    He did incite hatred, he was racist, he was abusive and he was threatening.

    It's just the police realised that it's a waste of time and a violation of free speech to charge someone with this sort of stuff. Please cut off this one-dimensional view of the problem.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Underwood)
    He did incite hatred, he was racist, he was abusive and he was threatening.

    It's just the police realised that it's a waste of time and a violation of free speech to charge someone with this sort of stuff. Please cut off this one-dimensional view of the problem.
    Free speech does not allow you to incite hatred and be abusive and threatening. Clearly he did non of the above or he would be charged accordingly
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Betelgeuse-)
    Free speech does not allow you to incite hatred and be abusive and threatening. Clearly he did non of the above or he would be charged accordingly
    He referred to Muslims as "towel heads" on Twitter.

    That quite clearly is abusive and inciting hatred.

    He also asked a woman to explain Brussels based solely on hear appearance.

    That is racist and threatening.

    You don't know exactly why the charges were dropped, so you're not in a position to claim that he didn't commit those crimes.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    if you think the way to solve a problem is by attacking people's thoughts the people will react
    Well said. 'CPS tells Met' they had NO right to charge'
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you rather give up salt or pepper?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.