Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter

    I've been learning about the IS-LM model recently, and in the long run, a rise in M will cause P to rise such that M/P is unchanged. This will then mean that Y/V(i) is unchanged, since M/P = Y/V(i). Hence, a given level of i will correspond to the same level of Y as it did before the rise in M, so the LM curve will simply return to its original position, leaving Y and i unchanged.

    Now, thereal interest rater is decided by the willingness to save and invest - it is decided by real factors, not the level of M. Hence, r is unchanged.

    However, inflation has obviously risen, since P rose to cancel out the initial rise in M. Surely this violates the identity i = r + inflation????? If i and r do not change, but inflation does, then the identity cannot hold! What on earth am I doing wrong here??

    Thanks so much in advance
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: March 27, 2016

University open days

  1. University of Bradford
    University-wide Postgraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  2. University of Buckingham
    Psychology Taster Tutorial Undergraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  3. Bournemouth University
    Clearing Campus Visit Undergraduate
    Wed, 1 Aug '18
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.