Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Maybe Cameron will use another war as a distraction from all the domestic crap. Like Thatcher did.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Helloworld_95)
    A lot of people in HK would rather it wasn't though.
    Maybe like 33%

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ironandbeer2)
    Maybe Cameron will use another war as a distraction from all the domestic crap. Like Thatcher did.
    Think you'll find that was more the Argentinian point of view, since they started it and all...
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ironandbeer2)
    Maybe Cameron will use another war as a distraction from all the domestic crap. Like Thatcher did.
    Only in Britain would a Prime Minister get criticised for defeating foreign hostile aggression in a war.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HucktheForde)
    Maybe like 33%

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Informal polling, albeit with fairly large samples of ~4400, put the percentage of HKers who would prefer British rule at 92%
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Great well done. Now try to take it.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Helloworld_95)
    Informal polling, albeit with fairly large samples of ~4400, put the percentage of HKers who would prefer British rule at 92%


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Sure, it's not remotely ideal, but to imply that there's a margin of error big enough that the real number is a minority is ridiculous.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thomb)
    Everyone seems to forget that in the last war Britain literally stabbed the Argentinians in the back.
    Everyone knows that the Argentinians invaded sovereign British territory with a huge amphibious force, expelled the one platoon of marines stationed there, along with its legal government, and subjected the inhabitants to an occupation.

    Upon which Britain organised a naval task force, sailed down to the South Atlantic, sank the biggest ship in the Argentinian navy with a torpedo from a nuclear submarine, (after which the Argies were so terrified their whole fleet stayed in port for the remainder of the war) and then landed a small army which forced the much much larger Argentinan military force to surrender with hardly a shot fired and at the loss of a few hundred men because they were so cold, hungry and unwilling to fight for a land which wasn't theirs.

    Totally humiliating the entire Argy nation and leading the to eject the fascist junta who had led them to this pass.

    It wasn't a stab in the back. It was walking up to them face to face and sticking a sword in their heart.

    But at least we got rid of their fascist military dictatorship for them.

    You're welcome, Argentina.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Helloworld_95)
    Sure, it's not remotely ideal, but to imply that there's a margin of error big enough that the real number is a minority is ridiculous.
    It was only done in hong kong. I thought it was pretty obvious.

    + the poll was done poorly. I have seen other polls with more options and most ppl wants independence and not British rule as honkie were discriminated (paid less etc) during colonial period). Either ways, they are welcome to try like the argies.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Yes, it was corrupt, even so, there was no doubt that the people of Crimea wanted to be in Russia

    Just like the Sudetenland etc., which overwhelmingly wanted reunification into Germany

    In both cases, we (the West) certainly did not like the outcome
    Given the referendum was carried out in the space of what, two weeks? As well as widespread fraud, no observers, or fair campaigning I wouldt be able to conclude that at all. In short there is little to no comparison with the referendum carried out in the Falklands.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    (Original post by Helloworld_95)
    The problem is that Argentinian waters now surround the Falklands, hence any ships travelling there have to cross them which is a problem and then some.
    This was the most interesting point in the thread. have you seen any comments on how the UK will deal with this issue? Notwithstanding its advisory and non binding. Wonder if theyd try a blockade? i dont think they have the navy to do it.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    This was the most interesting point in the thread. have you seen any comments on how the UK will deal with this issue? Notwithstanding its advisory and non binding. Wonder if theyd try a blockade? i dont think they have the navy to do it.
    Either argue that the waters around the Falklands should be similarly extended, or be all "come at me"

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    Either argue that the waters around the Falklands should be similarly extended, or be all "come at me"

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    The decision isnt final so part of me is interested in the academic arguments and why the panel reached this decison. Not binding, but slightly awkward.

    FAOD I dont believe we should give in to Argie demands. They invaded , they lost and they lost the argument.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    This was the most interesting point in the thread. have you seen any comments on how the UK will deal with this issue? Notwithstanding its advisory and non binding. Wonder if theyd try a blockade? i dont think they have the navy to do it.
    Enclaves in territorial waters have the same status as land ones. That is to say Argentina has no legal grounds to blockade civilian shipping in any way shape or form from reaching the Falklands.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    This was the most interesting point in the thread. have you seen any comments on how the UK will deal with this issue? Notwithstanding its advisory and non binding. Wonder if theyd try a blockade? i dont think they have the navy to do it.
    They definitely don't have the force required for such a task. Their ships barely spend any time at sea, are in chronic disrepair and capsize in harbour - when they're not not getting impounded by other countries.
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    (Original post by pol pot noodles)
    Enclaves in territorial waters have the same status as land ones. That is to say Argentina has no legal grounds to blockade civilian shipping in any way shape or form from reaching the Falklands.
    Thanks. It could make it more awkward for the Royal Navy, then?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    Thanks. It could make it more awkward for the Royal Navy, then?
    Well, again 'legally' during peace time they can't without a valid reason, but from a PR standpoint the general world public are less likely to care about Argentina harassing the Royal Navy illegally than they would about civilian vessels. I could even imagine many on the British left supporting such moves because apparently a British warship sailing to British territory would be provocative or some crap like that. Corbyn definitely would.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by an_atheist)
    How about, we give the population of the Falklands a referendum to pick which country controls them? We the west are champions of democracy aren't we?
    A referendum surely will say stay British.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by an_atheist)
    How about, we give the population of the Falklands a referendum to pick which country controls them? We the west are champions of democracy aren't we?
    They did before and they voted overwhelmingly to stay part of the UK
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: April 15, 2016
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Are unpaid trial work shifts fair?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.