You are Here: Home >< Physics

1. In my CGP guide, it says: "Radio waves used for TV and FM radio transmissions have very short wavelengths (10cm-10m). To get reception, you must be in direct sight of the transmitter - the signal doesn't bend around hills or travel far through buildings."

Whereas, the BBC website says this:"Radio waves are used to transmit television and radio programmes. Television uses higher frequencies than radio.A radio programme receiver does not need to be directly in view of the transmitter to receive programme signals. Diffraction allows low-frequency radio waves to be received behind hills, although repeater stations are often used to improve the quality of the signals."I am so confused; I get that long wavelength waves are diffracted and short wavelengths or not, but these two articles seem to have contrasting statements.The CGP one sasys that for radio and tv you need to be in sight of the transmitter, but the bbc one says that you dont need to be in sight of it for tv and radio.Can someone explain it properly please?
2. (Original post by blobbybill)
In my CGP guide, it says: "Radio waves used for TV and FM radio transmissions have very short wavelengths (10cm-10m). To get reception, you must be in direct sight of the transmitter - the signal doesn't bend around hills or travel far through buildings."

Whereas, the BBC website says this:"Radio waves are used to transmit television and radio programmes. Television uses higher frequencies than radio.A radio programme receiver does not need to be directly in view of the transmitter to receive programme signals. Diffraction allows low-frequency radio waves to be received behind hills, although repeater stations are often used to improve the quality of the signals."I am so confused; I get that long wavelength waves are diffracted and short wavelengths or not, but these two articles seem to have contrasting statements.The CGP one sasys that for radio and tv you need to be in sight of the transmitter, but the bbc one says that you dont need to be in sight of it for tv and radio.Can someone explain it properly please?
some waves diffract less than others

3. but do the radio/tv waves require you to be inline with the receiver or not? One says you do, one says you dont.
(Original post by thefatone)
some waves diffract less than others

4. (Original post by blobbybill)
but do the radio/tv waves require you to be inline with the receiver or not? One says you do, one says you dont.
i think the diagram answers that, see the(diagram on the right) one with a longer wavelength diffracts more? that doesn't need to be inline with the receiver since it bends round corner and stuff more.
a shorter wavelength however (diagram on the left) diffracts less and can't reach the reciever so the shorter the wavelength, the less if diffracts, the more it needs to be inline with the reciever
5. (Original post by thefatone)
i think the diagram answers that, see the(diagram on the right) one with a longer wavelength diffracts more? that doesn't need to be inline with the receiver since it bends round corner and stuff more.
a shorter wavelength however (diagram on the left) diffracts less and can't reach the reciever so the shorter the wavelength, the less if diffracts, the more it needs to be inline with the reciever
Yes, and your diagram confirms that. I am asking for with radio waves that are used for TV and FM radio, are they long enough wavelengths to diffract? The CGP says that they are not, whereas the BBC says that they are.

Thanks
6. (Original post by blobbybill)
Yes, and your diagram confirms that. I am asking for with radio waves that are used for TV and FM radio, are they long enough wavelengths to diffract? The CGP says that they are not, whereas the BBC says that they are.

Thanks

maybe this helps?
7. It's not a case of this wave diffracts and that wave doesn't... it's that this (AM radio frequency) wave diffracts more than that (TV frequency) wave

typical AM radio frequency 1.152 MHz ~ 261 m wavelength
typical TV frequency 500 Mhz ~ 0.6 m wavelength

The BBC website is probably written for a less technical audience and is therefore less careful about its terms
8. (Original post by Joinedup)
It's not a case of this wave diffracts and that wave doesn't... it's that this (AM radio frequency) wave diffracts more than that (TV frequency) wave

typical AM radio frequency 1.152 MHz ~ 261 m wavelength
typical TV frequency 500 Mhz ~ 0.6 m wavelength

The BBC website is probably written for a less technical audience and is therefore less careful about its terms
Not probably, definitely.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: April 2, 2016
Today on TSR

Am I pregnant?

...or just paranoid?

A robot wrote Harry Potter?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.