You are Here: Home >< Maths

# BMO question from 1980 watch

1. Prove that the equation x^n + y^n = z^n, where n is an integer > 1, has no solution in integers x, y, and z, with 0 < x <= n, 0 < y <= n.

Find the shortest solution you can; I have one that only takes 4 lines of working.
2. (Original post by HapaxOromenon2)
Prove that the equation x^n + y^n = z^n, where n is an integer > 1, has no solution in integers x, y, and z, with 0 < x <= n, 0 < y <= n.

Find the shortest solution you can; I have one that only takes 4 lines of working.
One can get this pretty snappily with the contrapositive. Took me quite a while to notice this.
Spoiler:
Show
Suppose the equation has a solution, and w.l.o.g. .

But . The result follows.
3. (Original post by joostan)
One can get this pretty snappily with the contrapositive. Took me quite a while to notice this.
Spoiler:
Show
Suppose the equation has a solution, and w.l.o.g. .

But . The result follows.
What I did: By Fermat's Last Theorem there are no solutions for n>2, so since we are given n>1, we need only consider n = 2. Thus we have that x^2 + y^2 = z^2 and 0<x<=2, 0<y<=2, so x and y can each only be 1 or 2.
Thus we check 1^2 + 1^2 = 2, 1^2 + 2^2 = 2^2 + 1^2 = 5, 2^2 + 2^2 = 8, none of which are square numbers. Thus the result follows.

4. (Original post by HapaxOromenon2)
What I did: By Fermat's Last Theorem there are no solutions for n>2, so since we are given n>1, we need only consider n = 2. Thus we have that x^2 + y^2 = z^2 and 0<x<=2, 0<y<=2, so x and y can each only be 1 or 2.
Thus we check 1^2 + 1^2 = 2, 1^2 + 2^2 = 2^2 + 1^2 = 5, 2^2 + 2^2 = 8, none of which are square numbers. Thus the result follows.

I disagree, assuming Fermat's Last Theorem is gigantic, the proof of it - monumental.
Moreover this question was initially set before the theorem was proved.
5. (Original post by joostan)
I disagree, assuming Fermat's Last Theorem is gigantic, the proof of it - monumental.
Moreover this question was initially set before the theorem was proved.
True. But it's still easier to understand than the thing you did, because you don't have to understand the proof of a theorem in order to understand it's statement and to use it to solve problems.
6. (Original post by joostan)
I disagree, assuming Fermat's Last Theorem is gigantic, the proof of it - monumental.
Moreover this question was initially set before the theorem was proved.
He's a well known troll, this is his ~10/11th account. I wouldn't bother replying to him.
7. (Original post by Zacken)
He's a well known troll, this is his ~10/11th account. I wouldn't bother replying to him.
I demand that you cease and desist from defamation of me at once.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: April 2, 2016
Today on TSR

### Three reasons you may feel demotivated right now

...and how to stay positive

### Can I get A*s if I start revising now?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE