Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shiny)
    It gets very busy in the combined bio, chem and physics forums!
    Bah, we need benabots .
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    it goes in this order:

    Durham, Warwick
    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by DazYaSSS)
    it goes in this order:

    Durham, Warwick
    What are you basing that on?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nylex)
    Oh . There was one guy in our lab, Dr. Freer, he knew pretty much everything.
    Thats exactly the same as my lab - we have postgraduate 'demonstraters' overseeing us who don't really know how to help us, then a guy called Dr Grint who knows everything! He was my dad's inorganic tutor when my dad did his degree, which shows how long he's been around!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    What do people think about Physics at Bristol?
    Where's better in your opinion - Bristol or Bath?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hitchhiker_13)
    What do people think about Physics at Bristol?
    Where's better in your opinion - Bristol or Bath?
    Bath, but just personal preference really..
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Bath has a gd option of industrial experience but gives a high offer!

    Durham is the best 4 physics and is a fantastically gorge uni, including having the oldest uni building in the world (university college-norman castle). Its not as intense at maths either, although u can choose different maths options.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Yes, I'm also thinking about Bristol (it's almost down to Bristol/Durham).
    What's the diff between their courses (astro for me)? Lydiamonds said something 'bout less maths at Durham, but maybe that was compared to Bath?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Oxford, Royal Holloway
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by integral_neo)
    Oxford, Royal Holloway
    Oxford, yes!

    Royal Holloway?! Seriously?! I didn't think that was a particularly great uni and I certainly didn't know it was well renowned for Physics?! :confused:
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Historically Cambridge is by far the most famous British university for physics. Dunno what they've been doing recently though. I keep hearing good things about Oxford and Durham.

    As for Royal Holloway, I think it did quite well in a Guardian league table last year or something. One of my physics teachers got a Third from there.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Squishy)
    Historically Cambridge is by far the most famous British university for physics. Dunno what they've been doing recently though. I keep hearing good things about Oxford and Durham.

    As for Royal Holloway, I think it did quite well in a Guardian league table last year or something. One of my physics teachers got a Third from there.
    Probs with Cams is they don't offer Physics as a single degree (only NatSci) so many people prefer Oxford. I think Durham & Oxford are the current top 2 for Physics according to most league tables.

    Re: Royal Holloway! I stand corrected! Just looked in Guardian's League Tables: http://education.guardian.co.uk/univ...216110,00.html and Oxford=1st and RH=2nd! Durham's fallen quite a bit to 5th.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hoofbeat)
    Probs with Cams is they don't offer Physics as a single degree (only NatSci) so many people prefer Oxford. I think Durham & Oxford are the current top 2 for Physics according to most league tables.
    It's all good stuff!

    Besides lots of people realise they actually don't like Physics during NatSci and switch to something else!
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hoofbeat)
    Probs with Cams is they don't offer Physics as a single degree (only NatSci) so many people prefer Oxford. I think Durham & Oxford are the current top 2 for Physics according to most league tables.
    Well, most of Cambridge's famous physicists studied Maths, so I dunno how good it is for teaching Physics.

    By the way, don't put too much faith in The Guardian tables. They're fishy.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hoofbeat)
    Oxford, yes!

    Royal Holloway?! Seriously?! I didn't think that was a particularly great uni and I certainly didn't know it was well renowned for Physics?! :confused:
    Royal Holloway ??? LOL! They gave me an offer for an IB diploma with 32 points. 32 points is rediculously easy to obtain. Warwick wanted 36 and Cambridge 39 (yes 4 points is a huge difference as we only have 6 subjects with a maximum of 7 in each).
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I would severly urge u not to look at Guardian tables as theyre method of scoring is stupid. They look at wat u got last year, and notoriously oxbridge does well as a huge factor of the rankings is how much money the uni has, and oxbridge has loads, although its not nescerrialy on the students. U want to look at the times as they only judge on teaching and things that directly affect students.

    Historically cambridge is better? In wat way? I suppose we're going on old physicists, who probably existed in the time wen ox and camb were the only unis!

    again, u need to look at the course differences. Oxfords course is half maths, and Bath have a huge emphasis on xperimental work. durham has a cool thing that u work in a research dep in ur 4th year.
    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Lydiamonds)
    I would severly urge u not to look at Guardian tables as theyre method of scoring is stupid. They look at wat u got last year, and notoriously oxbridge does well as a huge factor of the rankings is how much money the uni has, and oxbridge has loads, although its not nescerrialy on the students. U want to look at the times as they only judge on teaching and things that directly affect students.
    Umm the current Times League table (published in May 2004) uses data from the academic year 2001/02 (and for the record looks at teaching, research, A level scores, student/staff ratios, library spending, facilities spending, % 1sts and 2is awarded, graduate employment and completion rates)

    The current Guardian tables use data from 2002/03 (and looks at teaching, spending(both library and facilities), student staff ration, graduate employment, A levels, difference between intake and output quality (value added), and diversity)

    The only major difference between the two is the inclusion of research scores - the guardian considers them irrelevent to undergraduate applicants, the times give them 1.5* the rating they do entry scores.

    The Sunday Times will be published in September and will be based on 2002/03 data but will also include some extra information for each uni from 2003/04...however it doesn't include subject tables.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    WOW! Everyone seems to hate the guardian's league tables! Must say they aren't ones I used myself when I was picking Uni's so Im v.glad!

    The best thing when you chose a course is to look for one that suits you! Like Lydia says, some courses specialise on the maths side of physics, others have more practical sessions! It all depends what you like! The best thing to do is to find out which Unis have your suitable grade requirements, order their prospectuses, find the courses that suit you and narrow down say 8-10choices and try and visit some of them on open days (preferably not too many during school time as some schools get v.p*ssed off by that!) and then find your 6 to apply too.

    (Original post by Pencil Queen)
    The Sunday Times will be published in September and will be based on 2002/03 data but will also include some extra information for each uni from 2003/04...however it doesn't include subject tables.
    Btw, the Times do do a subjects league table. I don't know if it is actually included in the paper, but it is listed on their website and also in the books you can find in soem career libraries.
    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Hoofbeat)
    Btw, the Times do do a subjects league table. I don't know if it is actually included in the paper, but it is listed on their website and also in the books you can find in soem career libraries.
    The Times do yes (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,716,00.html )- the SUNDAY Times don't: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,8403,00.html
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Guardian is known to favour some unis, and look fown on ex polytechs. This elitest behaviour is wat has put it into poor light.

    At the end of the day go with the uni you feel happiest with, for wateva reasons u want. Perhaps u like cheap stuff-go to Hull. Perhaps u want to live in a castle- try Durham. Perhaps u want to be part of a cultural and alive city-try Liverpool or London. wateva the reason bhappy peeps! And choose 4 yerself, not 4 wat will make others happy!
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.