Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    About 4(f)(II), I used to V=V0e^(-t/RC) equation to find the value of R as 137ohm but it is wrong

    Can somebody please explain to me how we use use proportion equation of T=RC and original R value from graph?
    Attached Images
        
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mystreet091234)
    About 4(f)(II), I used to V=V0e^(-t/RC) equation to find the value of R as 137ohm but it is wrong

    Can somebody please explain to me how we use use proportion equation of T=RC and original R value from graph?
    even so 137 is still closer to 150 than it is to 100. why didn't you go for 150 anyway?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Joinedup)
    even so 137 is still closer to 150 than it is to 100. why didn't you go for 150 anyway?
    Cuz when R is larger, T is also larger. I was thinking if R is 150, time needed will be more than 12s.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mystreet091234)
    Cuz when R is larger, T is also larger. I was thinking if R is 150, time needed will be more than 12s.
    Well you already worked out from the experimental data that the real circuit was about 10% quicker than the theoretical calculation... so for a new time interval making R 10% greater, i.e. 10% slower than the theoretical calculation should get you close.
    137+13.7=150.7
    ----

    anyway


    V0 = 12 V
    V = 5 V
    C= 100x10-6F

    new value for time elapsed t=12 s

    ln V - ln V0 = -t/RC

    get everything that's not changed onto the same side of the equals sign

    C (ln V - ln V0) = -t/R

    what this means is that if everything else is held constant then -t/R is constant ratio... so it'll be the same for the new value of R that makes t=12s as it was for the old value of R when t was measured at 17.5 s

    told/Rold=tnew/Rnew

    17.5/(220x103)=12/Rnew

    12/(17.5/(220x103))=R
    = 220x103 * (12/17.5)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Joinedup)
    Well you already worked out from the experimental data that the real circuit was about 10% quicker than the theoretical calculation... so for a new time interval making R 10% greater, i.e. 10% slower than the theoretical calculation should get you close.
    137+13.7=150.7
    ----

    anyway


    V0 = 12 V
    V = 5 V
    C= 100x10-6F

    new value for time elapsed t=12 s

    ln V - ln V0 = -t/RC

    get everything that's not changed onto the same side of the equals sign

    C (ln V - ln V0) = -t/R

    what this means is that if everything else is held constant then -t/R is constant ratio... so it'll be the same for the new value of R that makes t=12s as it was for the old value of R when t was measured at 17.5 s

    told/Rold=tnew/Rnew

    17.5/(220x103)=12/Rnew

    12/(17.5/(220x103))=R
    = 220x103 * (12/17.5)
    Thanks!
    So we should check whether the experimental value matches the theoretical one before we apply an equation to calculate the new value?
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mystreet091234)
    Thanks!
    So we should check whether the experimental value matches the theoretical one before we apply an equation to calculate the new value?
    in this case yes because it seems to be asking us what the designer will choose to make t=5 based on information from the experiment rather than calculate a theoretical value.
    calculating a %age difference between expected and actual was an earlier part of the question (I looked up the paper to see the the whole question) , if you've worked through the question in order it could have been a clue.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Joinedup)
    in this case yes because it seems to be asking us what the designer will choose to make t=5 based on information from the experiment rather than calculate a theoretical value.
    calculating a %age difference between expected and actual was an earlier part of the question (I looked up the paper to see the the whole question) , if you've worked through the question in order it could have been a clue.
    Understood! THANKS A LOT!!!
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.