Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Background scenario:
    10 years ago 'X' a healthy female patient donated a blood sample to screen and research 10 genes known to be frequent in many types of cancer. Patient 'X' did not have the mutations and the blood samples were later stored. She signed a sample consent form which did not specify how the samples may later be used. Last year, scientists decided to screen 1000 random patients for a gene now thought to be associated with genetic predisposition to Alzheimer's disease. Patient 'X' was found to be heterozygous for this gene (she had 1 but not 2 copies for people who don't know) She now lives in a different country.

    The debate:
    Should the researchers locate patient 'X' and tell her about the findings?

    Motions:
    1) The house believes 'X's risk is very small and there is no need to find her
    or
    2) The house believes 'X' has the right to know about these latest findings

    Which motion would you support and why ?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.