Why is Zac Goldsmith saying Sadiq Khan is unprincipled?

Why would he say that?

Because he knows his policies are **** so he's going for the man.

Hasn't Labour taken the high ground on this and poor old Zac is down there in the pit of desperation, trying to sling mud around and hoping some of it would stick?

Why would he say that?

Because he is a terrorist sympathiser

how have they taken the high ground to endorse a candidate that supported a radical fundamentalist?

A candidate who, despite being Muslim, voted for same-sex marriage after receiving death threats, and had the same fundamentalist preacher removed from his mosque.

Because his campaign has been nothing more than a smear campaign to get support and trying to get Khan out of the running.



Except he's not. He voted in favour of gay marriage even after receiving death threats. He had a fatwa issued against him and was condemned by British-based hardline Muslim clerics, who have accused him of ‘selling out’ his religion.

Oh dear. Tory supporters seem to be one trick ponies...

he wants Sadiq in a bad way.

Only half of that is true. What else is true is the fact he has shared platforms with extremists and terrorists on multiple occasions, all while knowing what they were. He has shared platforms with organisations who support or fail to recognise ISIS as a terror organisation. He has actually defended more clients in court (when he was a lawyer) on charges of terrorism/extremism than any other crime. Why is he attracted to defending terrorists. Few lawyers have that statistic on their record. He has publicly stood with terrorists.

You can say it's a coincidence but you have to be a real retard (and therefore not qualified for mayor) to make that mistake 100s of times

Tory supporter - You support a person that is part of the Conservative Party.

I can't help but loathe a person who tries to character assassinate other people and gets his cronies to do the same from a national standpoint, and without even a robust case.

The Tories are in favour of competition, but only when the chips are stacked on their side. They can't win so they try playing ugly.

Despicable.

So he's only standing for the Conservatives because they have the infrastructure and reach that he wouldn't have if he was an independent?

So that makes him a hypocrite to boot too? I thought he couldn't sink any lower but you're starting to prove that he can.

The charge being that the person is an extremist because he supports IS, which is a criminal offence in E&W, as of yet, remains unproven.

The Labour Party doesn't seek to remove hundreds of thousands of electoral voters in one fell sweep, and doesn't seek to gerry-mander the number of seats available in Parliament.

It also doesn't try and stuff the HoL with as many peers as it dares to put through in an attempt to subvert the scrutiny process that the HoL is there to engage in.