Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

29 years ago, a Russian defector predicted what's EXACTLY happening right now in west watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:


    scary, scary video
    take the red pill
    wake up
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    14 minute video?.....Aint nobody got time for that.

    Post cliff notes or nobody gonna watch it mane
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Daimonos)
    14 minute video?.....Aint nobody got time for that.

    Post cliff notes or nobody gonna watch it mane
    It is interesting to watch actually but only from a historical perspective.

    He was a Soviet KGB defector who argued that the cold war was a brutal fight to the death as far the USSR was concerned and the US should respond in kind.

    As it turned out the Soviet Union was on the point of collapse and a few years after this the Berlin Wall came down and Eastern Europe broke free.

    So I don't see what exactly he is meant to have predicted as he had no awareness of any of that.

    His views on the decline of the west and its loss of belief in itself had more prescience, but it isn't communism which provides the existential threat.

    I'll leave others to ponder where that threat comes from, if it does.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Anyone who thinks that what currently exists in the West is anything other than communism is utterly deluded.

    They want you to tie yourself to ambiguous, meaningless identities so you can destroy existing power structures. They've been doing this to you since the 1950s. They want you to identify as female, and create some commonality between all females owing to something as arbitrary as your genitalia, so they can pit you off against men and profit. It's all in-group/out-group mechanics - the in-group is constantly under attack, they import or create ever more identities (cultures, sexualities, genders, etc.) to shore up the struggle between more and more groups, and they sit back and profit from the outcome.

    Soon enough, every gender (I can't believe I have to use the word 'every' in the context of gender) is warring, as is every ethnicity, sexuality and religion, and what's even better is the more people they import the more votes they accrue. The resident population has long since lost any desire to vote for them, so they just import an electorate which will.

    Before long - 100 years - every identity will be vying for position, and nothing will ever be achieved other than eternal conflict, largely because the objective is 'equality' and, in the context of every legal right and full equality of opportunity being applied to every individual irrespective of identity, all that's left is 64 million differing interpretation of what amounts to equality. When everyone disagrees on what 'equality' means - which is exactly what they want - no-one is equal and the struggle perpetuates. The revolution continues.

    All of these divisive, deconstructive ideologies are underpinned by communism - feminism was started by communists (Betty Friedan, author of the feminine mystique, was a communist), multiculturalism was started by communists (a guy called Stuart Hall), diversity was started by a communist...all of it. We live in a communist society, you just don't see it. The only valid unit of political analysis isn't a bigoted stereotype you apportion to 'all women', or 'all black people' (ie, 'black people or women are oppressed', it's individuality.

    You are an individual, NOT a category. DON'T let them categorise you - at the heart of a desire to categorise is a desire to control you, your thoughts and your actions. They force you into their categorisations by shaming and guilting you into adopting them - you defy your own beliefs, or even convince yourself of the validity of their claims, because they juxtapose absolutely everything and turn it into a 'valued direction' to head in. Mass immigration, a far-left policy, has been propagated into a valued direction, as has 'diversity', as has 'relative equality'...none of it stands up in the face of any careful intellectual scrutiny.

    They'll also cloak every historical narrative - the National Socialist German Workers Party is, apparently, according to the OED, a right-wing movement. This despite the fact it advocated statism, deplored individualism and loathed laissez faire capitalism. Mussolini is, according to numerous 'authoritative sources', the proponent of a 'right-wing' ideology, when, in his Fascist Manifesto he advocated in favour of the minimum wage, pandering to the unions, progressive taxation and lowering the voting age.

    'conservatives' are frequently blamed with refusing to support the abolition of slavery in the Americas, however it wasn't 'conservatives', it was Democrats. They - democrats - cloak it in 'conservatism' to deny their own involvement, when it was the Republicans who voted for abolition. Even the narrative peddled about slavery is entirely false - white people didn't enslave black people; near every black slave enslaved through the Atlantic slave trade was enslaved by a black African tribal leader and sold onto European colonisers for a profit. What's more, 1 million white people were enslaved through the Arab slave trade, a fact which is never, ever taught in primary schools, largely because it interrupts the 'shame and guilt' narratives.

    When have you ever heard a communist owning up, in the modern age, to being a communist? Look at what they do - they are communists, then they are Marxists, then they are Socialists, then they are Democratic Socialists, then they are Social Democrats, then they are Progressive, then they are Liberal (a term they co-opted from the right-wing) - don't you wonder why the left flings so much terminology around? It's quite simple - every time they are exposed for what they are, they simply re-brand. When has a conservative not been a conservative? Never.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    So it was the Ruskies behind the generation of hippies! :shakecane:




    Hippies =/= Marxism. The hippie movement began as a civil libertarian movement at core.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    The problem with Russians is that they are all crazy.

    This is not necessarily a bad thing but it does make them unreliable predictors of anything. Where Germans all think the same and change their minds at the same time, there will always be some mad Russian at every time who believes any given thing and will stand on that ground against the world.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    In the 90s with the breakup of the Soviet Union, Russia simply underwent a cosmetic upgrade and some structural reforms, other than that, it's largely the same beast, using the likes of RT and other news outlets to continue to cause mischief in the West.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    You want to weaken the enemy, making them hippies is the most efficient way to do that

    Or perhaps it was a side effect of the "war"-weariness the Soviets undoubtedly aimed to seed in the US, combined with anti-capitalism, rebellious feelings, and general decadence

    But anyway, I was mainly joking

    Hippies are simply the result of shutting down mental asylums
    Nah, the hippie movement was pretty great when it first started. It was about freedom, essentially. Look at the kinds of people who started it; William Burroughs, Jack Kerouac, Hunter Thompson. Hardly your average, pathetic little SJWs. William Burroughs even said he hated the left. Their ideals, sadly, long since passed, but I'll always be a hippie at core. Which is why I can't stand fascists and totalitarians.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I can predict what will happen. Russia will scramble for power in Eastern Europe, the EU will throw money into making Poland the dominant power.

    This isn't an illusion, this statement was made during the Polish Soviet War in 1920 in which the Polish won
    "Closed within the boundaries of the 16th century, cut off from the Black Sea and Baltic Sea, deprived of land and mineral wealth of the South and Southeast, Russia could easily move into the status of second-grade power. Poland as the largest and strongest of new states, could easily establish a sphere of influence stretching from Finland to the Caucasus"

    It's actually true, the idea that Russia is the dominant power in Eastern Europe is based on tradition but need not be the future. It's why the Russians are so scared in Ukraine.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Perhaps the Soviets infiltrated the hippies?
    Haha, maybe. Or maybe it just went the way most movements do; watered down and hijacked by morons.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by patrickstarfish)


    scary, scary video
    take the red pill
    wake up
    Thanks for sharing
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by patrickstarfish)


    scary, scary video
    take the red pill
    wake up
    I Nostradamuski predict that in 29 years time the Queen will be 90, the Conservative Party will have a row about Europe, some famous comedians and pop stars will die and Leicester City will win the League Championship.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: May 2, 2016
Poll
Who is your favourite TV detective?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.