Anyone who thinks that what currently exists in the West is anything other than communism is utterly deluded.
They want you to tie yourself to ambiguous, meaningless identities so you can destroy existing power structures. They've been doing this to you since the 1950s. They want you to identify as female, and create some commonality between all females owing to something as arbitrary as your genitalia, so they can pit you off against men and profit. It's all in-group/out-group mechanics - the in-group is constantly under attack, they import or create ever more identities (cultures, sexualities, genders, etc.) to shore up the struggle between more and more groups, and they sit back and profit from the outcome.
Soon enough, every gender (I can't believe I have to use the word 'every' in the context of gender) is warring, as is every ethnicity, sexuality and religion, and what's even better is the more people they import the more votes they accrue. The resident population has long since lost any desire to vote for them, so they just import an electorate which will.
Before long - 100 years - every identity will be vying for position, and nothing will ever be achieved other than eternal conflict, largely because the objective is 'equality' and, in the context of every legal right and full equality of opportunity being applied to every individual irrespective of identity, all that's left is 64 million differing interpretation of what amounts to equality. When everyone disagrees on what 'equality' means - which is exactly what they want - no-one is equal and the struggle perpetuates. The revolution continues.
All of these divisive, deconstructive ideologies are underpinned by communism - feminism was started by communists (Betty Friedan, author of the feminine mystique, was a communist), multiculturalism was started by communists (a guy called Stuart Hall), diversity was started by a communist...all of it. We live in a communist society, you just don't see it. The only valid unit of political analysis isn't a bigoted stereotype you apportion to 'all women', or 'all black people' (ie, 'black people or women are oppressed'
, it's individuality.
You are an individual, NOT a category. DON'T let them categorise you - at the heart of a desire to categorise is a desire to control you, your thoughts and your actions. They force you into their categorisations by shaming and guilting you into adopting them - you defy your own beliefs, or even convince yourself of the validity of their claims, because they juxtapose absolutely everything and turn it into a 'valued direction' to head in. Mass immigration, a far-left policy, has been propagated into a valued direction, as has 'diversity', as has 'relative equality'...none of it stands up in the face of any careful intellectual scrutiny.
They'll also cloak every historical narrative - the National Socialist German Workers Party is, apparently, according to the OED, a right-wing movement. This despite the fact it advocated statism, deplored individualism and loathed laissez faire capitalism. Mussolini is, according to numerous 'authoritative sources', the proponent of a 'right-wing' ideology, when, in his Fascist Manifesto he advocated in favour of the minimum wage, pandering to the unions, progressive taxation and lowering the voting age.
'conservatives' are frequently blamed with refusing to support the abolition of slavery in the Americas, however it wasn't 'conservatives', it was Democrats. They - democrats - cloak it in 'conservatism' to deny their own involvement, when it was the Republicans who voted for abolition. Even the narrative peddled about slavery is entirely false - white people didn't enslave black people; near every black slave enslaved through the Atlantic slave trade was enslaved by a black African tribal leader and sold onto European colonisers for a profit. What's more, 1 million white people were enslaved through the Arab slave trade, a fact which is never, ever taught in primary schools, largely because it interrupts the 'shame and guilt' narratives.
When have you ever heard a communist owning up, in the modern age, to being a communist? Look at what they do - they are communists, then they are Marxists, then they are Socialists, then they are Democratic Socialists, then they are Social Democrats, then they are Progressive, then they are Liberal (a term they co-opted from the right-wing) - don't you wonder why the left flings so much terminology around? It's quite simple - every time they are exposed for what they are, they simply re-brand. When has a conservative not been a conservative? Never.